Handbook Political Theory.pdf

(Grace) #1

However, in modern society especially, agreement will often be diYcult to
obtain. When that is so, we mustWnd ways of explaining why the coercive
power of the state is to be invoked in defense of impartial rules, and we must
also say why those rules really are impartial, rather than sectarian. The
dilemma here is that, insofar as impartiality reXects a commitment to equal-
ity, and insofar as equality is itself a moral concept, impartial rules will
not be impartial with respect to absolutely everything. In particular, they
will not be impartial with respect to those who deny the moral value of
equality. This is neither avoidable nor regrettable. No moral position of any
interest can be defended to absolutely everyone, and an impartialist position
cannot, and should not, apologise about its own impartiality.


Reference


Baron,M. 1991. Impartiality and friendship.Ethics, 101 : 836 – 57.
Barry,B. 1995 .Justice as Impartiality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Deigh,J. 1991. Impartiality: a closing note.Ethics, 101 : 858 – 64.
Fried,C. 1970 .An Anatomy of Values. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Hampton,J. 1993. The moral commitments of liberalism. Pp. 292 – 313 inThe Idea of
Democracy, ed. D. Copp, J. Hampton, and J. Roemer. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Hurd,H. 1995. Review ofPolitical Liberalism.Yale Law Journal, 105 : 795 – 824.
Nagel,T. 1987. Moral conXict and political legitimacy.Philosophy and Public AVairs,
16 : 215 – 40.
—— 1991 .Equality and Partiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rawls,J. 1958. Justice as fairness.Philosophical Review, 67 : 164 – 94.
—— 1971 .A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
—— 1993 .Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Scanlon,T. 1982. Contractualism and utilitarianism. Pp. 103 – 28 inUtilitarianism
and Beyond,ed. A. Sen and B. Williams. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
—— 1998 .What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Scheffler,S. 1994. The appeal of political liberalism.Ethics, 105 : 4 – 22.
Waldron,J. 1999. Rawls’sPolitical Liberalism. In J. Waldron,Law and Disagreement.
Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Williams,B. 1981 .Moral Luck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Young,I. 1990 .Justice and the Politics of DiVerence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Uni-
versity Press.


impartiality 435
Free download pdf