used). The PSI includes a validity scale (Defensive
Responding), which should be calculated first. Indi-
viduals with a Defensive Responding score of 24 or
less are likely to be underreporting stress, and caution
should be exercised when interpreting such test proto-
cols. Subscale scores are calculated by summing each
of the responses that correspond with the subscale.
The subscale scores and the Life Stress scale score (if
used) are then transferred from the score sheet to the
profile form. The Child Domain subscale and the
Parent Domain factor scores are calculated by sum-
ming the appropriate subscales within each domain.
To obtain the Total Stress score, users sum the Child
Domain score and the Parent Domain score. Per-
centile scores corresponding to each of the subscale
raw scores are provided on the profile page. Percentile
scores are derived from the frequency distribution of
the normative sample. Subscale scores may be inter-
preted individually; however, scores are best consid-
ered in relation to each other. The Total Stress score
can be used to gauge whether professional interven-
tionmight be warranted. Total Stress raw scores greater
than 260 suggest a need for referral to an appropriate
professional for consultation.
Standardization
Normative data were collected from 2,633 mothers of
children ranging from 1 month to 12 years. Normative
data were also collected from 200 fathers with children
ranging in age from 6 months to 6 years. The PSI’s
reading difficulty level is estimated at the fifth grade.
Reliability and Validity
Internal consistency (reliability) has been estimated at
.70 to .83 for the subscales comprising the Child
Domain and .70 to .84 for the Parent Domain sub-
scales. Broad domain and Total Stress reliability coef-
ficients are greater than .90. Test-retest reliability
coefficients (ranging from 3 weeks to 1 year after ini-
tial administration) were relatively stable across four
studies: .55 to .82 for the Child Domain, .69 to .91 for
the Parent Domain, and .65 to .96 for Total Stress.
Several studies support the construct and predictive
validity of the PSI. The PSI has been used to identify
specific stressors for mothers of children with devel-
opmental delays, behavioral disorders, and chronic
illness. Validation studies have been conducted in
Chinese, Italian, Portuguese, Latin American Hispanic,
and French Canadian populations. Collectively, these
studies suggested that the PSI’s psychometric charac-
teristics are stable and robust across cultural and socioe-
conomic boundaries.
Parenting Stress Index–
Short Form (PSI–SF)
The Parenting Stress Index–Short Form (PSI–SF) was
derived from the PSI using factor-analytic procedures
at the request of clinicians and researchers who wanted
a valid measure of stress in the parent-child system that
could be administered in less than 10 minutes. At
36 items, this parent self-report inventory allows rapid
screening of parenting stress that derives from parent-
ing a difficult child, problems in the parent-child rela-
tionship, and stress that derives from personal factors
directly related to parenting. Total Stress and
Defensive Responding indicators are also obtained.
Research to date has suggested that the PSI–SF
performs similarly to the full-length PSI. The PSI
manual reports correlations of .87 to .94 between the
major PSI and PSI–SF domains noted above.
Jennifer L. Gagné and David Reitman
See also Divorce and Child Custody; Parent-Child
Relationship Inventory (PCRI); Parenting Satisfaction
Scale (PSS)
Further Readings
Abidin, R. R. (1992). The determinants of parenting
behavior. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 21,407–412.
Abidin, R. R. (1995). Parenting stress index(3rd ed.).
Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Reitman, D., Currier, R. O., & Stickle, T. R. (2002). A
critical evaluation of the Parenting Stress Index–Short
Form (PSI–SF) in a Head Start program. Journal
of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology,
31 (3), 384–392.
PAROLEDECISIONS
Parole decisions have important implications. For
prisoners, such decisions mean early release or define
the conditions of release. For the public, prisoner
reentry raises concerns about safety and community
integration. Despite waning enthusiasm for rehabilita-
tion in some countries, by using advances in risk
Parole Decisions——— 541
P-Cutler (Encyc)-45463.qxd 11/18/2007 12:43 PM Page 541