Encyclopedia of Psychology and Law

(lily) #1
recommend a bail amount or conditions of pretrial
supervision, including curfews, home confinement,
and drug testing. They also must decide what consti-
tutes an infraction or violation of those conditions
and how to respond to the infraction—for example,
asking the judge to issue a warrant for a person’s
arrest and ordering that the person be detained in jail
until the case is heard in court.

Presentence Decisions
When the case proceeds to the trial or plea bargaining
stage, probation officers help judges render sentences
through presentence investigation (PSI) reports.
Judges order presentence investigations, mostly in
felony cases, to obtain background information that
will guide them in imposing the most appropriate
sanction. In particular, PSIs assist judges in ascertain-
ing whether prison is an appropriate sentence in light
of the crime and the offender’s criminal and social his-
tory. Information in a PSI places the offense in a larger
context that informs the judge in determining whether
probation is a sufficiently punitive and fitting alterna-
tive to incarceration.
To obtain information for PSIs, probation officers
interview offenders; review their criminal, educa-
tional, and military records; and contact family mem-
bers and others who know important details about the
offender’s life. The PSI report presents the judge with
the offender’s comprehensive social, criminological,
and psychological profile. The report covers the
offender’s history of treatment for medical, psychi-
atric, and substance use disorders as well as the cir-
cumstances of the offense. In addition, it covers his or
her social and family relationships, present living con-
ditions, and financial and housing status.
The PSI report also describes the resources available
to help people who might be sentenced to probation and
contains specific sentencing recommendations, if
requested by the court or required by the statute. A pro-
bation officer can present his or her opinions regarding
the offender’s motivation and readiness to change and
the circumstances surrounding the offender’s criminal
involvement. The PSI formulates an appropriate super-
vision or treatment plan, and if the person is sentenced
to prison, it helps prison administrators decide whether
the person should be placed in a minimum-, medium-,
or maximum-security facility. Probation officers exer-
cise discretion when conducting a PSI, deciding what
questions to ask, how to ask the questions, what details
to include in or exclude from the report, and whether

the offender will be better served by probation or
imprisonment.
Probation officers display their own particular
styles in the PSI information-gathering process.
For example, the officer whose style reflects a social
work orientation might focus on psychological data,
whereas the officer oriented toward rule enforcement
might focus on the offender’s criminal record and cur-
rent charges. Individual differences among officers
and variations in department standards produce wide
disparities in the manner in which presentence inves-
tigations are prepared by officers and used by judges.

Postconviction Decisions
Probation requires offenders to be supervised in the
community under conditions of release. All probation-
ers are subject to statutorily mandated or standard
conditions of release, such as reporting to their proba-
tion officer and getting permission from the sentenc-
ing judge to leave the jurisdiction. They also are
prohibited from owning a gun. An arrest on probation
constitutes a violation that could result in a prison sen-
tence. The special conditions of probation can be
punitive (paying restitution) or rehabilitative (attend-
ing drug treatment) and are designed to respond to the
particular facts of the case or needs of the offender.
Probation officers are responsible for enforcing the
conditions of probation and reporting to the court vio-
lations of probation.
Shortly after an offender is sentenced to probation,
probation officers conduct an intake interview to
assess an offender’s risk and needs. Risk assessment
strategies evaluate the likelihood that an offender will
be rearrested while on probation, whereas need assess-
ment strategies evaluate offenders’ problems and needs
for services in areas such as addiction, mental health,
and employment. Probation officers use case classifi-
cation tools that structure their decisions about case
management strategies. These tools contain static (age,
instant offense, and number of previous convictions)
and dynamic (employment, educational level, and sub-
stance use disorders) factors. The most common tool,
the Level of Service Inventory–Revised, examines
both dynamic and static variables to classify cases for
supervision and services.
In the intake assessment process, probation officers
must determine the degree to which offenders are
likely to recidivate and identify which members of
their caseloads pose a threat to public safety. Based on
this determination, officers devise and implement a

622 ———Probation Decisions

P-Cutler (Encyc)-45463.qxd 11/18/2007 12:43 PM Page 622

Free download pdf