SbC subjects usually have significant others in their
lives, although these others are often part of the prob-
lem. Outstanding criminal warrants on the SbC subject
also are prevalent. They may state that they would
rather die than return to prison.
Although early research in SbC focused on prepa-
ration by SbC subjects, more recent research done by
the author has found that about half of the SbC inci-
dents are impulsive rather than planned. About half of
the SbC subjects, who she studied, had made some
sort of statement or had a change in behavior that
could be interpreted as presuicidal. These behaviors
included writing and leaving a note, telling a therapist
or significant other of what they were considering,
and giving away possessions. Prior suicide attempts
overall were not very prevalent; however, those who
had attempted suicide in the past were more likely to
be successful in their attempts in inducing police offi-
cers to shoot them.
The courts have not decided predominantly in
favor or against police officers in all SbC cases; how-
ever, the courts have agreed that only the facts known
by the officers at the time of the incident are relevant
to the case. Intentions or motives of the SbC subjects
discovered later are not directly related. The degree of
danger that the officer or another person is in is judged
at what is known by the officer at the time of the inci-
dent. Officers are granted qualified immunity unless
they violate established law. The plaintiff has the bur-
den to prove that the officers committed a constitu-
tional violation.
Although the courts should consider only what the
officer would have known at the time of the incident, it
is useful to conduct a psychological autopsy to investi-
gate what the individual’s state of mind was at the time
of the SbC incident. Such information will give officers
a better understanding of the subject’s motivation, plan,
and pathology. It can help also in officers’ psychologi-
cal debriefings. Information for a psychological
autopsy often is obtained from the subject’s friends,
family, and co-workers, as well as from any notes left
by the subject, recent high-risk behavior, the giving
away of personal property, and actions or statements
that suggest preoccupation with death and/or suicide.
Officers who are involved in the SbC incident, espe-
cially the officer(s) who actually shoot the subject, are
quite likely to suffer psychological traumatic stress dis-
order. Often, the subject does not actually have a loaded
or real gun, although it appears real at the time of
the incident. The officer may feel manipulated by the
subject and is unprepared for the emotional and physi-
ological reactions that follow the shooting. The officer
also is often not given the opportunity to verbalize or
emotionally ventilate his or her emotions. It is critical
that police agencies require officers to see a therapist if
they are involved in shootings or other violent incidents.
Vivian B. Lord
See alsoCritical Incidents; Police Psychology; Psychological
Autopsies
Further Readings
Hutson, H. R., Anglin, D., Yarbrough, J., Hardaway,
K., Russell, M., Strote, J., et al. (1998). Suicide by cop.
Annals of Emergency Medicine, 32,665–669.
Lord, V. B. (2004). Suicide by cop: Inducing officers to shoot.
Flushing, NY: Looseleaf Law.
Parent, R. B., & Verdun-Jones, S. (1998). Victim precipitated
homicide: Police use of deadly force in British Columbia.
Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies
and Management, 21,432–448.
SUPERMAXPRISONS
Super-maximum secure or “supermax” prisons are
used to hold those prisoners whom prison authorities
regard as the most problematic in the prison system.
These facilities merge the 19th-century practice of
long-term solitary confinement with 21st-century tech-
nology in ways that subject prisoners to unparalleled
levels of isolation, surveillance, and control, usually for
long duration, with the potential to inflict significant
amounts of psychological harm. Despite a range of aca-
demic studies documenting the serious and potentially
long-lasting psychological harm it may inflict, and sev-
eral judicial opinions criticizing the risks it entails and
significantly limiting its use, the supermax prison form
persists. This entry describes the conditions in which
prisoners in supermax confinement are held, character-
istics of the supermax population, effects on prisoners
of supermax confinement, and the current legal status
of supermax prisons.
Although different prison systems employ different
terminology to refer to supermax-like conditions (e.g.,
“control unit,” “special management unit,” “security
housing unit,” or “close management”), these units have
enough distinctive features in common to be analyzed as
Supermax Prisons——— 787
S-Cutler (Encyc)-45463.qxd 11/18/2007 12:44 PM Page 787