Clark County School District v. Breeden,2: 736
Clark v. Arizona,1:217,1:374,2: 488
Classification of Violence Risk (COVR), 1:92–93,2: 470
Clay, Henry,1: 27
“Clear and convincing evidence,”1: 396
Cleckley, Hervey,1:348,2:557,2:646,2: 647
Clinical psychologists,1: 234
Clinical research
consent to clinical research,1:148–150
defined,1: 148
Clothing bias in identification procedures, 1:94–95
Clozapine,2: 654
CM (countermeasures). SeeCountermeasures (CM)
CMR (Comprehension of MirandaRights). SeeComprehension
of MirandaRights (CMR)
CMR–R (Comprehension of MirandaRights–Recognition). See
Comprehension of MirandaRights–Recognition (CMR–R)
CMR–V (Comprehension of MirandaVocabulary). See
Comprehension of MirandaVocabulary (CMR–V)
Code of Federal Regulations,1: 149
Cognitive abilities, criminal behavior and,1: 155
Cognitive-behavioral approach
for conduct disorder,1: 135
for pedophilia,2: 550
for sexual offenders,2:730,2: 731
substance abuse treatment,2:776–777
Cognitive complexity approach, nonverbal behavior,1: 201
Cognitive deficits
competence of youthful offenders,1: 3
criminal behavior and,1: 156
juvenile offending and,1: 436
psychotic disorders,2: 650
Cognitive development theory, of legal socialization,2: 451
Cognitive freedom,1: 199
Cognitive impairment
malingering,2:471,2:473–474,2: 501
substance abuse and,2: 780
Cognitive Interview (CI),1:79,1:95–99,1: 196
communication,1: 97
empirical testing to validate,1:97–98
legal challenges to,1: 99
memory and cognition,1: 96
practical issues,1: 98
social dynamics,1:95–96
training in,1: 99
Cognitive psychologists,1: 234
Cognitive therapy, for depression,2: 515
Cohn, Ellen,2: 451
Colgrove v. Battin,1: 424
Columbine shooting,2: 486
Commitment
mug shots,2: 522
rights following,2: 491
See alsoCivil commitment; Outpatient commitment,
involuntary
Commonwealth v. Trainor,2: 529
Community-based interventions, conduct disorders,1: 136
Community corrections, 1:100–103
evidence-based risk assessment,1: 101intensive supervision programs (ISPs),1: 102
mentally ill supervisees,1:102–103
rehabilitation and,1:101–102
surveillance model of supervision,1: 102
Community notification
effectiveness of,2:722–723
history of,2: 722
Megan’s Laws,2:721–724
sex offender recidivism and,2:723–724
unintended consequences of,2: 723
Community psychologists,1: 234
Comparison Question Tests (CQT),2:598–599
Compensatory damages,1: 181
Competence
to be sentenced,1:116–118
competency for execution,1: 114
to confess,1:118–119
consent to clinical research,1:148–150
defined,1: 116
end-of-life issues,1:256–257
for execution,1:112–115
financial capacity,1:313–316
foundational and decisional,1:105–108
informed consent,1:150,1: 359
of juries. SeeJury competence
to proceed pro se,1:126–127
restoration of,1:108–110,1:114,1:121,1: 122
societal values and,1: 106
to stand trial,1:2–5,1:119–122,1:265–266
testamentary capacity,2:798–801
to waive appeals,1:123–125
to waive counsel,1:126–127
to waive rights,1:59–60
See alsoAdjudicative competence; Competency,
foundational and decisional
Competence assessment,1:121–122
Competence Assessment for Standing Trial for Defendants
with Mental Retardation,1:4,1:103–105,1: 121
competence for execution,1: 114
Competence Screening Test,1:115–116
Competency Assessment Instrument,1:111–112
Evaluation of Competence to Stand Trial–Revised,
1:121,1:266–267
Georgia Court Competence Test,1:335–336
Hopkins Competency Assessment Test,
1:359–360
Interdisciplinary Fitness Interview,1:4,1:121,
1:377–378
Juvenile Adjudicative Competency Interview,
1:4,1: 332
MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Clinical
Research,1:360,2:463–464
MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Criminal
Adjudication,1:121,1:126,2:464–466
MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Treatment,
1:53,1:360,2:466–467,2:633–634
MacArthur Juvenile Adjudicative Competence study,
1:3,1: 5
settings for,1: 120Index———I- 7Index-Cutler (Encyc) Vol-2-45463.qxd 11/18/2007 12:44 PM Page 7