Competence Assessment for Standing Trial for
Defendants with Mental Retardation (CAST*MR),
1:4,1:103–105,1: 121
description of,1: 104
use of,1: 105
validity and reliability of,1:104–105
Competence to waive rights,1:59–60
Competency, foundational and decisional, 1:105–108
capacity to consent to treatment,1:51–55
Competence Assessment for Standing Trial for Defendants
with Mental Retardation,1:4,1:103–105,1: 121
consent to clinical research,1:148–150
criteria for,1:105–106
restoration of,1:108–110,1:114,1:121,1: 122
societal values and,1: 106
See alsoCompetence
Competency, restoration of, 1:108–110,1: 122
competence for execution,1: 114
focus of,1:109–110
legal and ethical context,1:108–109
success rate for,1: 110
treatment for,1: 121
Competency Assessment Instrument (CAI),
1:111–112
Competency for execution, 1:112–115,1: 269
assessment of,1: 114
checklist for,1:63–64
legal standards,1:113–114
research on,1:114–115
treatment for restoration to competency,1: 114
See alsoCapital cases; Death penalty
Competency Screening Test (CST), 1:111,1:115–116
Competency to be sentenced, 1:116–118
Competency to confess, 1:118–119
Competency to proceed,1: 120
Competency to stand trial, 1:119–122,1:269,1: 323
ECST–R,1:121,1:266–267
Fitness Interview Test–Revised,1:4,1:121,1:322–324
forensic assessment,1:330–331
Georgia Court Competence Test,1:335–336
Interdisciplinary Fitness Interview,1:4,1:121,1:377–378
juvenile offenders,1:2–5
legal standards and procedures,1:120–121
Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test
(M–FAST),2:502–503
Competency to waive appeals, 1:123–125
complexities in,1:123–124
evaluation of defendants,1: 125
in plea bargains,1: 123
Supreme Court cases,1:124–125
Competency to waive counsel (proceed pro se), 1:126–127
Complex evidence in litigation, 1:127–130
defining complexity,1:128–129
expertise and,1:127–128
groups as information processors,1: 128
Complex Trial Protocol (CTP),1: 198
Compliant false confessions,1:307–308
Composite International Diagnostic Interview,1: 30
Comprehension of MirandaRights (CMR),1: 337Comprehension of MirandaRights–Recognition
(CMR–R),1: 337
Computer-assisted lineups, 1:130–131
Computer hacking,1: 178
Computers
cybercrime,1:177–179
“cyber hate,”1: 48
cyberstalking,1: 178
hacking,1: 178
See alsoInternet
Computer software
COVR,1:92–93,2: 470
facial composites with,1: 305
violence risk assessment,2: 470
WITNESS model,2:864–866
Concealed Knowledge Test (CKT),2:597–598
Condie, L.O.,1: 338
Conditional release programs, 1:132–133
community corrections,1:100–103
revocation of,1: 132
Conduct disorder (CD),1:133–136,2: 494
antisocial personality disorder,1:28–33
definition of,1: 134
impact of,1: 134
juvenile offenders,1:133–136,2: 494
prevalence of,1: 134
psychopathy and,1:134–135
subtypes of,1: 134
Confabulation,1: 340
forced confabulation,1:324–325
Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales,1:308,1:340–341
Confession evidence, 1:136–137
Confessions,1: 402
competency to confess,1:118–119
confession evidence,1:136–137
false confessions,1:306–310,2:844,2: 870
videotaping,1:137,2:844–847
Confidence-accuracy (CA) calibration,1:138,1:139–140
Confidence in identifications, 1:138–142
accuracy of eyewitness descriptions,1:285–287
barriers to use of calibration approach,1: 141
confidence-accuracy calibration,1:138,1:139–140
confidence-accuracy correlation,1: 139
disguises and appearance changes and,1:287–290
exposure time and,1:282–283
implications,1:140–141
malleability,1:142–145
motions to suppress eyewitness identification,2:518–521
Neil v. Biggerscriteria for evaluating eyewitness
identification,2:523–526
voice recognition,2:851–854
Confidence in identifications, malleability,
1:141–142,1:142–145
current confidence in identification accuracy,1: 143
implications of,1: 144
remedies for,1:144–145
reports of crime details,1: 143
research,1: 144
retrospective confidence in identification accuracy,1:143–144I-8———Encyclopedia of Psychology and LawIndex-Cutler (Encyc) Vol-2-45463.qxd 11/18/2007 12:44 PM Page 8