Instructions to the witness, 1:376–377
Instruments for Assessing Understanding and Appreciation
of Miranda Rights 1:58,1:60. See alsoGrisso’s
Instruments for Assessing Understanding and
Appreciation of Miranda Rights
Integrated Automated Fingerprint Identification System,1: 318
Intellectual development, criminal behavior and,1: 156
Intensive supervision programs (ISPs),1: 102
Intentional acts,1: 35
Interdisciplinary Fitness Interview (IFI), 1:4,1:121,1:377–378
Interference, in mug shot research,2: 521
Inter-identity amnesia,1:227–228
Internalized false confessions,1: 308
International Association of Chiefs of Police
(IACP),2: 695
International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research
Involving Human Subjects,1: 149
Internet
cybercrime,1:177–179
hate crime,1: 48
obscenity on,2: 530
sex offender registries,2: 723
Interrogation of suspects, 1:379–381
alibi witnesses,1:14–15
camera perspective bias,2: 846
capacity to waive Mirandarights,1:59–60
capacity to waive rights,1:56–60
confession evidence,1:136–137
deception detection. SeeDetection of deception in adults;
Detection of deception in children
false confessions,1:306–310
false memories,1:310–313,2:609,2:676,2: 691
forced confabulation,1:324–325
interview different from,2: 679
police psychologists,2: 582
reform of,1:380–381
Reid technique,1:379,2:678–681
suspects’ views,1: 381
videotaping,1:137,2:844–847
Interviewing
behavior analysis interview,1:45–46
children’s testimony,1:79–81
of child sexual abuse victims,1:86–87
Cognitive Interview,1:79,1:95–99,1: 196
deception detection. SeeDetection of deception in adults;
Detection of deception in children
elderly eyewitnesses,1:252–254
false confessions,1:306–310,2:844,2: 870
false memories,1:310–313,2:609,2:676,2: 691
forced confabulation,1:324–325
interrogation different from,2: 679
interrogation of suspects,1:379–381
investigative interviewing,1: 380
for police selection,2: 586
posttrial juror interviews,2: 820
Risk-Sophistication-Treatment Inventory,2:701–702
Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IVAxis II Personality
Disorders,1: 30
Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms,
1:267,2:772–773Intimate partner violence, 1:382–386
battered woman syndrome,1:39–43,1: 385
Conflict Tactics Scale,1:145–146
Danger Assessment Instrument,1:185–186
defined,1:382–383
domestic violence courts,1:237–240
Domestic Violence Screening Instrument,1:185,1:240–242
incidence of,1: 382
interventions for,1:384–386
negative effects of,1: 384
police decision making and,2:567–569
prevention of,1:384–385
risk markers,1:383–384,2: 773
Spousal Assault Risk Assessment,1:185,1:241,2:750–751
substance abuse and,2:773–774
Intuition, eyewitness memory and,1:390–391
Investigative interviewing,1: 380
Involuntary commitment. SeeCivil commitment; Mandated
community treatment; Outpatient commitment,
involuntary
Involuntary conduct,2: 487
Involuntary medication. SeeForcible medication
Inwald Personality Inventory,1:331,2: 585
Iowa, sex offender civil commitment statutes,2: 720
IQ, criminal behavior and,1: 155
IRBs (institutional review boards). SeeInstitutional review
boards (IRBs)
Irresistible impulse test,1:163–164
IRT (item response theory). SeeItem response theory (IRT)
ISPs (intensive supervision programs). SeeIntensive supervision
programs (ISPs)
Item response theory (IRT),1:24,1: 351Jackson v. Indiana,1:108,1: 121
Jacob Wetterling Crimes Against Children and Sexually Violent
Offender Registration Act,2: 722
Jailhouse informers,2: 870
Jails. SeePrisons
Jail Screening Assessment Tool (JSAT), 1:331–332,1:387–388
administration of,1: 388
history of,1:387–388
Janofsky, Jeffrey S.,1: 359
JBS (Juror Bias Scale). SeeJuror Bias Scale
Jealous delusions,1: 194
J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B.,2: 856
Jessop, Christine,2: 852
Jewkes, Yvonne,1: 178
“Jim Crow” laws,2: 667
Johnson, Marcia,1:203,2:608,2: 748
Johnson v. Louisiana,1: 425
Joinder,1: 392
Joined trials,1:393–395
Joiner, General Electric Co. v.,1:271,1:273,1: 332
Jones, Damon,1: 134
JSAT (Jail Screening Assessment Tool). SeeJail Screening
Assessment Tool (JSAT)
Judges,1: 406
eyewitness identification and,1: 293
instructions to witnesses,1:376–377
jury decisions vs. judges’ decisions,1:405–408Index———I- 19Index-Cutler (Encyc) Vol-2-45463.qxd 11/18/2007 12:44 PM Page 19