Honored by the Glory of Islam. Conversion and Conquest in Ottoman Europe

(Dana P.) #1

  1. Necipoğlu, Architecture, Ceremonial, and Power, 30, 1 02–6.
    1 0. Finkel, Osman’s Dream, 1 95.

  2. Kafadar, Between Two Worlds, 1 46, 1 52.
    1 2. According to a Venetian report quoted in Finkel, Osman’s Dream, 1 84–85.
    1 3. Peirce, Imperial Harem, 9 1 – 11 2.
    1 4. Vatin and Veinstein, Le Sérail ébranlé, 266, 1 85–92.
    1 5. Ibid., 207–8.
    1 6. Necipoğlu, Architecture, Ceremonial, and Power, 1 43–44.
    1 7. Quataert, The Ottoman Empire, 1700–1922, 9 1.
    1 8. Katip Çelebi, Fezleke, 2:2 1 9, 220. Three horses he had ridden into ghaza,
    saddled backward, led his funeral procession to Ahmed I’s mausoleum on the
    Hippodrome.
    1 9. Goodwin, A History of Ottoman Architecture, 356.

  3. Piterberg, An Ottoman Tragedy, 1 7.

  4. Imber, The Ottoman Empire, 1300–1650, 1 26–27, 11 9.

  5. Peirce, The Imperial Harem, 9 1 – 11 2; Imber, The Ottoman Empire, 1 53; Hatha-
    way, The Politics of Households in Ottoman Egypt, 1 39–40.

  6. Shih-shan Henry Tsai, The Eunuchs in the Ming Dynasty (Albany: State Univer-
    sity of New York Press, 1 996).

  7. Matthew Sommer, “Dangerous Males, Vulnerable Males, and Polluted Males:
    The Regulation of Masculinity in Qing Dynasty Law,” in Chinese Femininities/Chinese


Masculinities: A Reader, eds. Susan Brownell and Jeffrey N. Wasserstrom (Berkeley: Uni-
versity of California Press, 2002), 68.



  1. Robert Van Gulik, Sexual Life in Ancient China: A Preliminary Survey of Chi-
    nese Sex and Society from ca. 1500 B.C. till 1644 A.D. (Leiden: Brill, 1961 ), 296, cited in


Brownell and Wasserstrom, “Introduction: Theorizing Feminities and Masculinities,”
in Chinese Femininities/Chinese Masculinities, 1 9. Whereas the Manchu vision of mascu-
linity was based on martiality, the Han promoted fi liality and literacy. See Angela Zito,
Of Body and Brush: Grand Sacrifi ce as Text/Performance in Eighteenth-Century China
(Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1 997), cited in Brownell and Wasserstrom, “In-
troduction: Theorizing Feminities and Masculinities,” in Chinese Femininities/Chinese
Masculinities, 1 9.


  1. Meisami, Persian Historiography, 29 1.

  2. Fahri Çetin Derin, Abdurrahman Abdi Paşa Vekâyi‘nâme’si: Tahlil ve Metin
    Tenkîdi, 1058–1093/1648–1682 (Doktora Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi, 1 993), xxiii.

  3. Strohm, England’s Empty Throne, 1 96–97.

  4. Kafadar, Between Two Worlds, 1 48.

  5. Imber, The Ottoman Empire, 1300–1650, 1 45.

  6. Rıfat Osman, Edirne Sarayı, ed. Süheyl Ünver, 2nd ed. (Ankara: Türk Tarih
    Kurumu Basımevi, 1 989), 3 1 –32.

  7. Gökyay, Evliya Çelebi Seyahatnâmesi, 11 4.

  8. Derin, Abdurrahman Abdi Paşa Vekâyi‘nâme’si, xxvii–xlv.

  9. Paul Strohm, Theory and the Premodern Text (Minneapolis: University of Min-
    nesota Press, 2000), 65, 77.


286 notes to pages 141–146
Free download pdf