FEDERATION
OF
VILLAGES
25
TheKing's
Road,
whichranfrom
Fatal
iputrato
thenorth-
west frontier
of India,
was the
main
highway of
commerce,
linking
togetherthe
hundreds
ofsingle
villages
plannedon the
principles
of the
Silpa-sastras,
which
lay between
the seat of
thecentral government
and
the farthest
confines
oftheempire.
Itwasnot the
workof
Chandragupta's
government,but
ofthe
Indo-Aryanvillage
communities.
Andthere
canhardlybe
any
doubt that the
construction
of the great
irrigation
works of
Chandragupta'stime,
and all
the regulations
for using
them
and keeping
them in
order, were natural
developments
of the
traditional
organisation
of these
con;imunities, and
not any
new departurein
theeconomic life
ofIndia.
Forimperial
administrative
andpolitical
purposesvillages
inancient
and medieval India
were grouped
togetherin tens,
twenties, hundreds,and
thousands,eachgroup
acknowledging
aRaja—the
over-lordorchiefofatribe
—whosedutyitwas
to
protectthevillage
landsandthe public
roadsunderhiscontrol
from
robbers andto defendthem
fromotherenemies,in
return
forwhich eachvillage
orgroupof villages paid hima
certain
vali,ortribute.
Buttheprincipleofmutualobligation
between
therulers and
ruled was recognised to suchan
extent that in
casetheofficersof
theover-lord
who
wereresponsibleforpublic
safety
failedtodetectandpunishoffenders,theoverlord himself
was
expected to make good from his treasuryanyloss which
individuals or the community might suffer. Whether
this
obligation
was generally fulfilled by the central authority is
another
matter—the fact that this wasoneof theimplications
innoblesseoblige
shows
thatthedemocraticprincipleofgovern-
mentwasfullyunderstood in ancient India.
Thedutyofloyaldevotiontothesupremeauthority,whichis
always
stronglyinsistedupon
in the sacred literatureofIndia,
wassomethingquitedifferenttotheWesternnotionofthe
divine
right
ofkings. The
principleofconstitutionalgovernmentfor