Police (IACP) (1986). Some of the more significant
applications of this specialty area are discussed in the
following sections.
Pre-Employment Selection
Pre-employment selection has been the earliest known
usage of psychology in law enforcement. Recent
research has concluded that police recruitment selec-
tion procedures vary greatly, that there is no standard
assessment process, and that there is an extensive vari-
ety of test battery composition. In an attempt to pro-
vide specific standards and constraints for a process
with wide variance, both the Police and Public Safety
Psychology Section of Division 18 of the APA and the
Police Psychological Services section of the IACP
proposed and ratified, via membership vote, a set of
guidelines for pre-employment psychological evalua-
tion. These guidelines established that only licensed
or certified psychologists trained and experienced in
psychological test interpretation and law enforce-
mentpsychological assessment techniques should con-
duct psychological screening for police agencies.
Furthermore, police psychologists must adhere to the
ethical principles and standards of the APA and all
state and federal laws, including the Americans with
Disabilities Act. The test battery must include objective,
job-related, validated psychological instruments, includ-
ing a cognitive test. Every test battery must also include
an individual face-to-face, semistructured interview.
Fitness-for-Duty Evaluations
Along with pre-employment screening for police can-
didates, the external police consultant often has the
task of facilitating mandatory fitness-for-duty evalua-
tions (FFDE). According to the IACP (Psychological
Fitness-For-Duty Evaluation Guidelines, 2004), a psy-
chological FFDE is a formal, specialized examination
of an incumbent employee (typically a sworn police
officer) that results from objective evidence that the
employee may be unable to safely or effectively per-
form a defined job task and/or a reasonable basis for
believing that this may be attributable to psychological
factors. The central purpose of an FFDE is to deter-
mine whether the employee is psychologically fit to
safely and effectively carry out essential job tasks and
responsibilities. At a minimum, the evaluator should
be a licensed psychologist or psychiatrist with training
and experience in psychological assessment,especially
in the evaluation of law enforcement personnel. The
police psychologist evaluator provides recommenda-
tions to the referring department. The department is
responsible for the ultimate determination of the dispo-
sition of the employee.
Clinical Intervention
The more typical responsibility, especially for the in-
house staff psychologist, is the provision of clinical
intervention and responses. Interestingly, in major
metropolitan police departments, crisis responses—
such as officer-involved shootings, severe vehicular
accidents, major injuries and deaths, suicide attempts
and completions, and SWAT (special weapons and
tactics) callouts—are quite common, occurring on
average once per week. Critical incidents within the
law enforcement community are conceptualized as
traumatic events. Thus, the event is conceptualized as
the officer’s having experienced an event significantly
outside the range of typical human experience, such
that his or her responses are typical reactions to the
abnormal event. The most frequently occurring psy-
chological sequelae following a critical incident
within law enforcement (especially if the police offi-
cer has the thought, “I’m going to die”) are social
isolation/withdrawal, sleep disturbances, flashbacks,
depression and anxiety, a heightened sense of danger,
hypervigilance, and increased alcohol/substance
abuse. Concurrent with crisis response capability, the
staff psychologist is actively involved in providing
stress inoculation training at the department’s training
bureau. Stress inoculation training has been found to
be successful in empowering police officers to pre-
vent, or at least lessen, the psychological impact of
stress within the responsibilities of police responses.
The more typical psychological interventions
police psychologists routinely undertake are individ-
ual, marital, and family counseling. The most frequent
presenting issues for individual therapy are stress/
anxiety, depression, substance abuse, domestic vio-
lence, and, more recently, compulsive gambling. The
affective disorders and marital and family interven-
tions are triaged by the staff psychologist to other
licensed mental health staff members of the psycho-
logical services section. These mental health profes-
sionals are then tasked with providing confidential
intervention, usually on a short-term basis of 8 to 12
weeks of therapy. All substance abuse, domestic vio-
lence, and compulsive gambling cases are assigned to
578 ———Police Psychologists
P-Cutler (Encyc)-45463.qxd 11/18/2007 12:43 PM Page 578