predicting what police applicants might say or do on
the job—for example, being late or absent, using
drugs, violating police procedures and rules, and using
excessive force. Few psychologists continue to use
projective tests, which ask applicants to respond
to unstructured situations or stimuli, such as the
Rorschach Inkblot Test. Less frequent among psychol-
ogists is the use of situational tests, in which police
applicants engage a role-playing exercise usually rep-
resentative of job-related work conditions. There has
been little empirical evidence supporting the use of
projective and situational tests in screening police
applicants for law enforcement training.
Psychologists supplement test scores from a battery
of psychological tests with information obtained from
a personal interview, a common component of the psy-
chological evaluation. Psychologists use a personal
history questionnaire to gather information on appli-
cants’ background (e.g., family, work, health, and
any criminal behavior). Their interview, in part, usu-
ally involves a structured question format. Psycholo-
gists, however, often ask probing questions that follow
up applicants’ responses and sometimes ask questions
that their police agency clients request. Personal inter-
views with police applicants help psychologists inter-
pret and validate test data sources.
Educating and Training Police Officers
The police have the responsibility to keep the peace,
maintain order, enforce laws, and safeguard the well-
being of the community. This kind of duty to act involves
the possibility of danger all the time, puts police offi-
cers at risk, and requires education and training.
Critical issues in police education and training to
which psychologists have given considerable attention
are negotiating hostage and barricaded-suspect (HBS)
situations, handling people with mental illness, con-
ducting criminal investigations, and managing job-
related stress.
Negotiating Hostage and Barricaded-Suspect Situations.
Most police agencies have and employ critical inci-
dent teams, sometimes called special response teams
(SRT) or special weapons and tactics (SWAT) teams,
to resolve or assist in resolving high-threat or special-
threat conditions, such as HBS situations. Police use
of critical incident teams has evolved since the highly
publicized HBS situation during the 1972 Olympic
Games in Munich, West Germany. The first police
approach to handling an HBS situation was an
assault,which involved officers primarily using force-
ful options, often with lethal consequences for suspects.
Sometimes, suspects’ family members subsequently
took legal action against the police.
In the early 1970s, psychologists and sworn per-
sonnel developed verbal tactics as alternatives to the
assault option. Such tactics focused on police officers
extending incident time to de-escalate the situation
and talking suspects into surrendering. Police records
have shown that critical incidents teams successfully
resolve most HBS situations without injury to partici-
pants when police officers negotiate verbally. When
police agencies used clinical psychologists to negoti-
ate such situations, the rate of success without injury
to participants increased.
HBS negotiation training is available at the Federal
Bureau of Investigation (FBI) academy in Quantico,
Virginia. The FBI’s Crisis Negotiation Unit delivers
training to all FBI negotiators and other law enforce-
ment negotiators. There are also private companies that
develop and deliver specialized training in negotiation
skills. Trainers are usually experienced police negotia-
tors who are sometimes psychologists. Police agencies
that employ full-time clinical psychologists sometimes
use them to educate and train their critical incident
team negotiators and work at times with them to
resolve, or assist in resolving, HBS calls for service.
Negotiation activities primarily focus on containing
suspects, negotiating with them, uncovering the per-
sonal factors motivating their behavior, and extending
incident time, which gives suspects the opportunity to
vent their emotions and make sensible decisions.
Negotiation training typically emphasizes developing
active listening skills through role-playing. Scholarly
research on the effectiveness of negotiation training is
in its infancy. A recent preliminary finding showed that
FBI agents significantly improved their active listening
skills following participation in the FBI’s National
Crisis Negotiation Course. Generally, however, there is
much research that needs to be done in order to evalu-
ate the effectiveness of crisis negotiation training.
Handling People With Mental Illness.The police are
having more contacts with people with mental illness.
Researchers have estimated that between 5% and 10%
of police-citizen contacts involve people with mental
illness. Contacts often occur in the home, family
members sometimes call for police services, and the
police usually resolve calls without incident. Some
Police Psychology——— 581
P-Cutler (Encyc)-45463.qxd 11/18/2007 12:43 PM Page 581