Busey, Tom,1: 321
Bushellcase,1: 413
Bush v. Gore,2: 662
Bussiere, M.T.,2:726,2: 727
Butcher, James,2: 506
Butyrophenones,2: 654
BWS (battered woman syndrome).. SeeBattered woman
syndrome (BWS)
BWSQ (Battered Women Syndrome Questionnaire–3). See
Battered Women Syndrome Questionnaire–3 (BWSQ-3)
Byron Mitchell, United States v.,1: 320
Bystander witnesses,1:82–83CA (confidence-accuracy) calibration. SeeConfidence-accuracy
(CA) calibration
CAI (Competency Assessment Instrument). SeeCompetency
Assessment Instrument (CAI)
California
jury nullification,1: 414
jury selection,1: 417
prison overcrowding in,2: 618
racial bias and death penalty,2: 671
sex offender legislation,2:550,2:720,2: 721
Sex Offender Treatment and Evaluation Project,2: 550
stalking legislation,2:753,2: 754
California, Kaplan v.,2: 529
California, Miller v.,2:529,2: 530
California Psychological Inventory (CPI),
1:30,2:585,2: 595
Camera perspective bias,2: 846
Canada
domestic violence courts in,1: 238
Dynamic Supervision Project,2: 752
parole decisions,2:542,2: 543
rates of mental illness,2: 494
sex offender recidivism,2: 510
Cannot Say Scale (MMPI–2),2: 507
Canter, David,2: 630
Capacity to consent to treatment, 1:51–54
advance directives,1:255,1:256,1:359,2: 633
clinical assessment of,1:52–53
consent to clinical research,1:148–150
models of,1: 52
proxy decision making,2:633–634
psychiatric advance directives,1:359,2:477,2:634–637
research on,1:53–54
standards,1: 51
Capacity to Consent to Treatment Instrument (CCTI),
1:54–55
limitations of,1: 55
reliability and validity,1: 55
scoring system,1: 55
structure and administration of,1:54–55
Capacity to waive Mirandarights, 1:56–58,1:118,
1:120,1: 330
Capacity to waive rights, 1:59–60
Grisso’s Instruments for Assessing Understanding and
Appreciation of Miranda Rights,1:58,1:60,1:336–338
for juveniles,1: 56Mirandarights,1:56–58
totality of circumstances test,1:56,1: 59
CAP Inventory. SeeChild Abuse Potential (CAP) Inventory
Capital cases
aggravating and mitigating circumstances, effects on jurors,
1:7,1:9–11
aggravating and mitigating circumstances in evaluation of,
1:6–9
death qualification of juries,1:190–192
“death row syndrome,”1: 124
elderly defendants,1: 252
jury understanding of judges’ instructions in,1:395–396,
1:418,1:426–428
for juvenile offenders,1:441–443
prosecutorial misconduct in capital trials,2: 632
religion and,2:681–682
trial,1: 188
waiver of appeals,1:123–125
See alsoDeath penalty; Execution
Capital Jury Project,1: 188
Capital mitigation, 1:60–63
legal doctrines governing,1: 62
psychological underpinning of,1:62–63
scope of,1: 61
Capital punishment. SeeDeath penalty
Caplan, Lincoln,2: 825
Caregiver abuse,1:251. See alsoElder abuse
Carmichael, Kumho Tire Company v.,1:271,1:273–274,
1:332,2: 828
Carmichael, Patrick,1: 274
Carr, Baker v.,2: 827
Casey, Planned Parenthood of Southeastern
Pennsylvania v.,1: 28
CAST*MR (Competence Assessment for Standing Trial
for Defendants with Mental Retardation). SeeCompetence
Assessment for Standing Trial for Defendants with
Mental Retardation (CAST*MR)
CBCA (Criteria-Based Content Analysis). SeeCriteria-Based
Content Analysis (CBCA)
CCTI (Capacity to Consent to Treatment Instrument). See
Capacity to Consent to Treatment Instrument (CCTI)
CD (conduct disorder). SeeConduct disorder(CD)
Challenge for-cause,1:417,1:420,2: 705
Change of venue,2: 617
Character disorders. SeePersonality disorders
Charles, Sara,2: 460
Charman, Steve,1: 377
Charter, Richard,2: 504
Checklist for Competency for Execution
Evaluations, 1:63–64
Checklists
for competency for execution evaluations,1:63–64
Hare Psychopathy Checklist–Revised,1:263–265,
1:348–350,1:438,2:642,2:643,2:644,2:645,2: 719
Hare Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version,
1:350–351
Hare Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version,
1:351–353
See alsoAssessment instrumentsIndex———I- 5Index-Cutler (Encyc) Vol-2-45463.qxd 11/18/2007 12:44 PM Page 5