KEARSLEY Baptism Then and Now 239
faith with God.^8 Probably this is taking Tertullian's rhetoric too seriously
and overlooking his exuberant irony. But the renunciation itself is serious.
For Tertullian's radical ethic is serious. It would be as unpopular today as
then. Baptism makes the candidates servants of God, called to renounce
both lust and worldly ambition (Ad uxorem 4). Tertullian takes Christ's
cleansing of the church in Ephesians as a reference to baptism: 'Without
the stain of immorality.. .without the disgrace of sin, we are made clean'
(Depudic. 18). The flesh is impure until the waters cleanse it (Depudic.
6). Christian purity draws its power from the washing (De pudic. 1).
Admittedly the ethic, so far, seems to focus morbidly on sexual purity and
exaggerated unworldliness, no doubt due to pincer pressures of perse-
cution and paganism. But the chief thrust of Tertullian is that Christian
discipleship is not a picnic. It involves above everything else a stark choice
and a moral struggle. Baptism is an intensifier for this. But is that all?
Baptism and Freedom
The casual reader may, so far, be confirmed in the suspicion that Tertul-
lian is a rabid legalist whose thought should not be mentioned in the same
breath as such an enlightened theologian as Moltmann. But Tertullian is
not a writer for casual readers! Everywhere, paradoxes pop up to com-
plicate things. Hence on baptism he is a rich mix of works and grace and
to this degree a genuine influence on the succeeding, problematic western
tradition. A good example of this is the renunciation of the devil, already
mentioned. Alongside the renunciation (something the baptismal candidate
does) we find the release (something the baptismal candidate receives—
from the trinitarian God). The very modern liberation motif of Exodus
appears inDe bapt. 9. The destruction of Israel's pursuers in the sea, the
nation's liberation from bondage, is a type of baptism. As Israel was
liberated, 'the gentiles are set free from this present world by means of
water, and leave behind, drowned in the water, their ancient tyrant the
devil'.^9 The backdrop for this is the fact that the devil rules over tainted
- J. Creehan, Early Christian Baptism and the Creed: A Study in Ante-Nicene
Theology (London: Burns, Oates, and Washbourne, 1950), pp. 96-97. Creehan is proba-
bly right to see the military oath behind the transformed bi-lateral pact of baptism (pp.
102-103). - If Creehan is right to regard stipulatio as referring to baptismal responses then
the words of Defuga 12 count here as well: 'The sun marked the day when we became
indebted for our redemption. Our setting free was enacted in Hell and the formal con-
tract was in Heaven.' Creehan's case, however, is far from firm. If successful it would