182
16 Ludwig Feuerbach, 17 Ibid, pp. xxxvii, 22.18 Sigmund Freud, (New York: Harper & Row, 1967), p. 17.Peter Gay (New York: W. W. Norton, 1989), p. 19.The Future of an IllusionLectures on the Essence of Religion, trans. and ed. James Strachey, intro. by , trans. Ralph Manheim
19 Ibid, p. 38. See also Michael J. Buckley, SJ, 20 Hans-Georg Gadamer, “The Philosophical Foundations of the Twentieth Ambi 2004), p. 108.Century,” in guous Progress of Modern AtheismPhilosophical Hermeneutics (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, , trans. and ed. David E. Linge (Berkeley: Denying and Disclosing God: The
21 Karl Barth, “The Word of God and the Task of Theology,” in 22 The situation does not change with Barth’s move from his dialectical theology University of California Press, 1976), pp. 107–29.and the Word of Manpp. 183–217. , trans. Douglas Horton (Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith, 1978), The Word of God
in the 1920s into the ontological argument. See Robert P. Scharlemann, “The No to Nothing and the Nothing to Know: Barth and Tillich and the Possibility of Theological Science,” in Virginia, 1989), pp. 109–24.Inscriptions and Refl ectionsChurch Dogmatics by way of his 1931 study of Anselm’s (Charlottesville: University Press of
23 Plato, 24 Ibid, p. 244 (506d).25 Ibid, pp. 245–7 (507a–509c). 26 p. 238 (502c) and p. 243 (505e).Augustine: Earlier WritingsThe Republic, trans. Desmond Lee (New York: Penguin Books, 1987), , ed. J. H. S. Burleigh (Philadelphia: Westminster, 1953),
27 Martin Heidegger, “The Onto-Logical Constitution of Metaphysics,” in 28 Thomas Aquinas, pp. 17–63.and DifferenceRow, 1969)., German and English, trans. Joan Stambaugh (New York: Harper & Summa Theologiae, Ia, q. 2, a. 12. Identity
29 See David E. Klemm, “The Rhetoric of Theological Argument,” in John 30 S. Nelson, Allan Megill, and Donald N. McCloskey (eds.), Human Sciences: Language and Argument in Scholarship and Public AffairsUniversity of Wisconsin Press, 1987), pp. 276–98.Summa Theologiae, I, qu. 45, 7. The Rhetoric of the (Madison:
31 Immanuel Kant, 32 Ibid., A644/B672, A647/B675.33 Ibid., A641/B669.34 DefiW. Wood (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), B377, B76. ning God as the infiCritique of Pure Reason nite in opposition to the fi, trans. and ed. Paul Guyer and Allen nite constitutes what Hegel
calls the “bad infiPhilosophy of Religion nite.” See Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, (1827), ed. Peter C. Hodgson (Berkeley: University of Lectures on theNotes to Pages 44–9
9 9781405155267_5Notes.indd 182 781405155267 5 _Notes.indd 182 5 5/2/2008 8:08:06 PM/ 2 / 2008 8 : 08 : 06 PM