personal entities, Daniels thus holds that they are real and supervenient
over their respective churches, though they can be changed by “naming,
unmasking, and calling to repentance,” (17).- Yong, Spirit and Creation , 166–177, 204.
- Yong, Spirit and Creation , 184–208.
- Yong, Spirit and Creation , 26–28.
- Stephen Jay Gould, “Nonoverlapping Magisteria,” Natural History 106
(1997): 16–22. - Ecklund, “Scientists Negotiate Boundaries between Religion and Science.”
- The Barna Group, “Six Reasons Young Christians Leave Church,” accessed
December 4, 2011, https://www.barna.org/barna- update/
millennials/528-six-reasons-young-christians-leave-church#.
VnX-tPkrLIU. - Michael Tenneson, David Bundrick, and Matthew Stanford, “A New
Survey Instrument and Its Findings for Relating Science and Theology,”
Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith 67 (2015): 200–222. Contact
the authors of this chapter if you would like to use the STPS survey. - Kurt P. Wise, Faith, Form, and Time: What the Bible Teaches and Science
Confi rms about Creation and the Age of the Universe (Nashville, TN: B&H
Publishing Group, 2002). - Ken Ham and Greg Hall, Already Compromised (Green Forest, AR: Master
Books, 2011). - Gould, “Nonoverlapping Magisteria.”
- Bigthink.com , “Neil deGrasse Tyson: Atheist or Agnostic?” blog entry by
Mark Cheney, YouTube video, April 25, 2012, http://bigthink.com/
think-tank/neil-degrasse-tyson-atheist-or-agnostic. - Lamoureux, Evolutionary Creation.
- Francis Collins, The Language of God (New York: Free Press, 2006).
- Hugh Ross, More Than a Theory: Revealing a Testable Model for Creation
(Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 2009), 30. - Moreland and Craig, Philosophical Foundations for a Christian Worldview.
- Robert J. Russell, Cosmology, Evolution, and Resurrection Hope: Theology
and Science in Creative Mutual Interaction (London: Pandora Press,
2006). - Tenneson, Bundrick, and Stanford, “A New Survey Instrument and Its
Findings for Relating Science and Theology.”
296 M. TENNESON ET AL.