Constructive Pneumatological Hermeneutics in Pentecostal Christianity

(Barry) #1
AFTERWORD: ON THE FUTURE OF PENTECOSTAL HERMENEUTICS 325


  1. Kenneth J. Archer, “Full Gospel,” in Handbook of Pentecostal Christianity ,
    ed. Adam Stewart (DeKalb, Illinois: Northern University Press, 2012),
    89–91.

  2. According to Kevin L.  Spawn and Archie T.  Wright, eds., Spirit and
    Scripture: Examining a Pneumatic Hermeneutic (New York, NY: T&T
    Clark International, 2012), the early Pentecostal narrative that I wanted to
    revision, which includes restoration, is arrogantly “triumphalistic” and
    “needs to be revised to preserve collegiality in both scholarly and ecumeni-
    cal dialogue.” Furthermore, they felt that I diminished “the historical, cul-
    tural and literary dimensions of the Scripture”(15). I fi nd that such a
    mis -reading of my overall monograph, A Pentecostal Hermeneutic for the
    Twenty First Century: Spirit, Scripture and Community (London: T&T
    Clark International, 2004), was helpful in the promotion of their “believ-
    ers criticism” and privileging modern historical critical methodologies for
    the interpretation of Scripture.

  3. This is what I set out to do in the sixth chapter of my book, check this
    cite A Pentecostal Hermeneutic for the Twenty-First Century: Spirit, Scripture
    and Community, Journal of Pentecostal Theology Supplement 28, London
    and New York: T&T Clark International, 2004), which takes into consid-
    eration the contrition’s of Spirit, Scripture (and particular methodologies
    for interpreting it), and community in the negotiation for meaning.

  4. For example see Amos Yong’s chapter in this volume. Yong has consis-
    tently argued for the importance of Lukan hermeneutic for his theological
    work.

  5. For one example see Stanley M. Burgess, ed., Christian Peoples of the Spirit:
    A Documented History of Pentecostal Spirituality from the Early Church to
    the Present (New York and London: New York University Press, 2011).

  6. See his Ancient-Future Faith: Rethinking Evangelicalism for a Postmodern
    World (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Books, 1999).

  7. See Yoon Shin’s chapter in this monograph.

  8. Kenneth J.  Archer, “Pentecostal Hermeneutics and the Society for
    Pentecostal Studies:
    Reading and Hearing in One Spirit and One Accord,” Pneuma 37.3
    (2015): 322–324.

  9. Concerning metamodernism, see the collection of essays in Germanistik in
    Ireland: Jahrbuch der/Yearbook of Association of Third- Level Teachers of
    Germen in Ireland 6 (2011) and the blog site “Notes on Metamodernism”
    which was founded in 2009 by Timotheus Vermeulen and Robin van den
    Akker, http://www.metamodernism.com/about-2/. In an interview
    titled “Notes on Metamodernism,” Tank Magazine (February 23, 2012)
    asked Timotheus Vermeulen to explains metamodern. Vermeulen stated
    that “meta signifi es an oscillation, a swinging or swaying with and between

Free download pdf