Constructive Pneumatological Hermeneutics in Pentecostal Christianity

(Barry) #1
To receive is to prepare, just as to receive guests for a dinner party is

to clean the house, do the shopping, cook the meal, and set the table.

Hermeneutically speaking, perhaps the best name for this preparation is

spirituality. To engage in the various spiritual disciplines, beginning with

private prayer and public worship, is an essential part of being open to the

teaching of the Spirit. 35

Fourth, unless we assume that the Holy Spirit has been on vacation

through most of church history, we will have to conclude that divine guid-

ance in understanding the Bible has taught different aspects of a truth too

great to be encompassed by any single theology or interpretation to dif-

ferent Christian communities in various settings and circumstances. This

means that one of the spiritual disciplines needed here is an ecumenical

spirit, an openness to the possibility that traditions different from our own

may have insight into facets of God’s truth that we might incorporate into

our own understanding. 36 Gadamer calls this the “fusion of horizons”; it

doesn’t signify becoming identical with each other but rather a process of

mutual enlargement of vision. Do I need to repeat that the idea that the

Holy Spirit presides over a holy pluralism is not an invitation to an “any-

thing goes” relativism?

Finally, given the above qualifi cation of “passive,” we can think of the

dialectic of active and receptive as the dialectic of scholarship and spirituality.

If we are not to be hermeneutical Docetists or Ebionites, we will have to take

the two poles with equal seriousness. As the saying goes, “Pray as if every-

thing depends on God and work as if everything depends on you.” Of course

this doesn’t mean working in the morning and praying in the afternoon.

There needs to be a perichoresis , a mutual indwelling of scholarship and spiri-

tuality, so that our biblical interpretation will be at once the best work of

which we are capable and, more than that, the result of an ongoing divine

teaching. Then we can be grateful for gifts of insight without arrogantly

assuming that we have the complete and fi nal truth. We can leave it to the

Enlightenment to assume that we have somehow become the Holy Spirit.

NOTES


  1. Scripture references are from the NRSV.

  2. So far as I can see, no particular theory of inspiration is required by this
    text.

  3. Perichoresis is a term developed by some of the patristic writers to signify
    the mutual indwelling or co-inherence of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit


SPIRIT AND PREJUDICE: THE DIALECTIC OF INTERPRETATION 29
Free download pdf