Moviemaker – Winter 2019

(Martin Jones) #1
6

ELCOME TO ISSUE #130, our
26th year of publication, and
our 19th annual survey of the
“Best Places to Live and Work as
a Moviemaker.” There are always
surprises on this list, and the 2019 incarnation is
no exception, with particularly strong showings
from Memphis and Portland, and the unabated
rise of industry behemoths Albuquerque and
Atlanta. The debate about which places should
make the cut was as vocal as ever, but this time
we continue it in our “Moviemaker Melee”
department, where two working moviemakers
debate the relative merits of living and working
in an urban or rural environment.
The “melee” theme hasn’t been limited to
our “Best Places” list at MovieMaker this winter.
As is often the case, I recently found myself
in the middle of a heated debate between two
moviemaker friends. One of them swore (well,
they both swore, actually) that he has a social
responsibility which requires him to be outspo-
ken on the issues of our day, especially matters
of injustice and inequality. He believes it’s his
moral duty, because he has a platform that oth-
ers don’t, to create work that gives a voice to the
otherwise voiceless, to challenge authority, and
to be part of “the resistance.” “I don’t distinguish
between my public and private lives when I’m
advocating for change,” he says.
My other friend called that view naïve at best,
professionally suicidal at worst. He believes
his only responsibility is to the marketplace,
where he is required to be sure that his films
are entertaining and well made, nothing more.
He acknowledges that he has strong political
opinions, but stresses that he keeps his beliefs—
political and otherwise—to himself. His social
media business pages are for commercial rea-
sons and his views are inappropriate there, even
unwelcome, he says.

ISSUE NO. 130, VOLUME 26
WINTER 2019
PHONE: 310/828-
EMAIL: [email protected]
WEB: WWW.MOVIEMAKER.COM

MOVIEMAKER PRODUCTION SERVICES DIRECTOR
TIMOTHY RHYS
MOVIEMAKER PRODUCTION SERVICES
OUTREACH COORDINATOR
RYAN WILLIAMS
MOVIEMAKER PRODCUTION SERVICES
PROGRAM COORDINATOR
CALEB HAMMOND
FESTIVAL & PARTNERSHIP LIAISON
RYAN WILLIAMS
SPECIAL EVENT COORDINATOR
MAX WEINSTEIN

TO SUBSCRIBE TO MOVIEMAKER:
CALL 888/881-5861 OR VISIT
WWW.MOVIEMAKER.COM/SUBSCRIPTIONS
TO ADVERTISE IN MOVIEMAKER:
IAN BAGE, 800/677-
MARK SELLS, 310/403-
MOVIEMAKER IS DISTRIBUTED BY:
CURTIS CIRCULATION, 201/634-
TO DISTRIBUTE MOVIEMAKER
AT YOUR EVENT: 310/828-
MOVIEMAKER® MAGAZINE IS PUBLISHED
FOUR TIMES PER YEAR BY MOVIEMAKER MEDIA, LLC
5340 ALLA ROAD. STE. 109
LOS ANGELES, CA 90066
PH: 310/828-8388;
EMAIL: [email protected].
ISSUE NO. 130, VOL. 26, “WINTER 2019.” SINGLE COPIES:
$8.95. SUBSCRIPTIONS TO MOVIEMAKER MAGAZINE:
IN U.S./CANADA, FOUR ISSUES FOR $19.95; EIGHT ISSUES
FOR $24.95, 12 ISSUES FOR $34.95. (INT’L, DIGITAL ONLY)
ANNUAL DIGITAL SUBSCRIPTIONS, REGARDLESS
OF GEOGRAPHY, ARE AVAILABLE VIA POCKETMAGS,
ITUNES AND GOOGLE PLAY FOR $9.
THE NAME “MOVIEMAKER” IS A REGISTERED TRADEMARK
OF MOVIEMAKER MEDIA, LLC. MOVIEMAKER WELCOMES
UNSOLICITED PHOTOS AND MANUSCRIPTS BUT
RESERVES COMPLETE EDITORIAL CONTROL OVER
ALL SUBMITTED MATERIAL, IS NOT
RESPONSIBLE FOR UNSOLICITED MATERIALS
AND CANNOT RETURN THEM UNLESS ACCOMPANIED
BY SELF-ADDRESSED, STAMPED ENVELOPE.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED IN ANY
FORM WHATSOEVER WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT
OF PUBLISHER. COPYRIGHT © 2019

PUBLISHER & EDITOR-IN-CHIEF
TIMOTHY RHYS
EXECUTIVE PUBLISHER
SCOTT SCHOTTER
ASSOCIATE PUBLISHER
PAUL TUKEY
MANAGING EDITOR
MAX WEINSTEIN
ASSISTANT EDITOR
CALEB HAMMOND
DIGITAL DIRECTOR
MARK SELLS
EDITOR AT LARGE, EAST COAST
PETER WEED
EDITOR AT LARGE, WEST COAST
GREG HAMILTON
ART DIRECTOR
KAY LAI SCANLON
CONTRIBUTING WRITERS
CARLOS AGUILAR, JENNIFER BLAIR,
AMIR GANJAVIE, DANIEL JOYAUX, MADDY KADISH,
HARPER LAMBERT, BRIAN O’HARE,
RYAN COLEMAN, RYAN STEWART, ANDY YOUNG
INTERN
CHRIS VILLALTA

“People don’t want that from me, they
want an escape. Certainly that’s true when
I’m making fiction, but it’s even true with my
documentaries. I stick to the subject, and don’t
shade it with my politics. My platform is not my
soapbox! I don’t let any of what I believe influ-
ence my social media pages.
“Because that’s my office. I don’t throw
F-bombs around my office, and I don’t take
stands that are going to be offensive to 30-50 per-
cent of my client base. I know lots of colleagues
of mine—other writers, editors, and friends in the
business—are reading my posts and I don’t want
them questioning whether or not they want to
work with me on their next project based on my
behavior or my personal beliefs. I’m not going
to sabotage myself. Business is business and I’m
aware that I need to act like a professional.”
So which is it? Should moviemakers remain
agnostic or do we have a social responsibility
with our work? Do we have an obligation to be
politically outspoken as citizens in a democracy,
especially when we see evil being perpetrated
by our “leaders”? If so, what are the appropriate
limits? Do we want our actors, writers, directors,
producers, and editors telling us what they think
all the time? As audience members, are we ever
truly able to separate the art from the artist?
What do you think? I’d be interested to know.
These questions resurfaced last night as I
watched the 2019 Golden Globes, where
Glenn Close, Patricia Clarkson, and others were
widely praised for speaking about female equality
and empowerment, while Christian Bale was ex-
coriated by some for his commentary on power,
namely the devil’s influence on his uncanny
portrayal of the former vice president of the
United States. Awards shows are often politically
charged affairs, but some moviemakers
(Robert De Niro, Woody Harrelson, and
Michael Shannon come to mind) don’t limit
themselves to shows, private pages, or even to
keeping their politics limited to their art... they
believe in being outspoken at all times. “What you
see is what you get” is their motto. If you don’t
want to buy their product because you don’t like
what they believe, that’s just fine with them.
This debate is as old as film itself. Lois Weber,
the first American woman to direct a feature-
length film (The Merchant of Venice, 1914), who
in the early film industry was in many ways the
equal of such giants as D.W. Griffith and
Cecil B. DeMille, was an advocate for cinema’s
ability to portray complex social issues in a popu-
lar narrative form. She made films about drug ad-
diction, urban poverty, the fight to abolish capital
punishment, and women’s struggle to gain access
to contraception. It’s tragic that her films are
now largely forgotten, because they were made
of nitrate stock, because the men who controlled
Hollywood didn’t respect female moviemakers,
and because the industry soon turned to enter-
tainment over social commentary. But a hundred
years later, I think the tide may finally be turning
for good. Enjoy #130. See you at Tribeca. MM

NOTEBOOK


BY TIM RHYS

WINTER 2019 MOVIEMAKER.COM

W


SHOULD YOUR


PLATFORM BE


YOUR SOAPBOX?

Free download pdf