416 / CONDUCTING NEGOTIATIONS
Understanding decision errors
ERROR DESCRIPTION
>>^ Acting contrary to your self-interest by increasing your
commitment to an original decision, despite the fact that
this decision produces negative outcomes (“throwing
good money after bad”).
>> Using a faulty anchor as a benchmark from which
to make adjustments and decisions. An ill-informed
home-buyer, for example, may use the seller’s asking
price as an anchor for their counteroffer, rather than
solid due diligence on home values.
>>^ Believing that you are more correct and accurate^
than you actually are. This leads to an overestimation
of your power within the negotiation, the options
open to you, and the probability of your success.
>> If you settle quickly on a deal when selling, feeling that
the “win” was too easy and that you could have gotten
more from the deal.
>>^ If you settle quickly on a deal when buying, thinking^
“I could have gotten this for less” or “What is wrong
with this item? I must have gotten a bad deal.”
Nonrational
escalation of
commitment
Anchoring and
adjustment
Overconfidence
The winner’s
curse
US_416-417_Avoiding_decision_traps_2.indd 416 30/05/16 3:07 pm