260 Chapter 4 The Potential Equation
Under the new assumption, Eq. (6) separates into
X′′+λ^2 X= 0 , Y′′−λ^2 Y= 0. (8)
The first of these equations, along with the boundary conditions, is recogniz-
able as an eigenvalue problem, whose solutions are
Xn(x)=sin(λnx), λ^2 n=
(nπ
a
) 2
.
The functionsYthat accompany theX’s are
Yn(y)=ancosh(λny)+bnsinh(λny).
Thea’s andb’s are for the moment unknown.
We s e e t h a tXn(x)Yn(y)is a solution of the (homogeneous) potential Eq. (1),
which satisfies the homogeneous conditions Eqs. (4) and (5). A sum of these
functions should satisfy the same conditions and equation, soumay have the
form
u(x,y)=
∑∞
n= 1
(
ancosh(λny)+bnsinh(λny)
)
sin(λnx). (9)
The nonhomogeneous boundary conditions Eqs. (2) and (3) are yet to be
satisfied. Ifuis to be of the form of Eq. (9), the boundary condition Eq. (2)
becomes
u(x, 0 )=
∑∞
n= 1
ansin
(nπx
a
)
=f 1 (x), 0 <x<a. (10)
We recognize a problem in Fourier series immediately. Theanmust be the
Fourier sine coefficients off 1 (x),
an=^2 a
∫a
0
f 1 (x)sin
(
nπx
a
)
dx.
The second boundary condition reads
u(x,b)=
∑∞
n= 1
(
ancosh(λnb)+bnsinh(λnb)
)
sin
(nπx
a
)
=f 2 (x), 0 <x<a.
This also is a problem in Fourier series, but it is not as neat. The constant
ancosh(λnb)+bnsinh(λnb)