5.5 Bessel’s Equation 311
- Suppose the problems originally stated were to be solved in the half-disk
0 <r<a,0<θ <π, with additional conditions:
v(r, 0 ,t)= 0 , 0 <r<a, 0 <t,
v(r,π,t)= 0 , 0 <r<a, 0 <t.
What eigenvalue problem arises in place of Eqs. (9)–(11)? Solve it. - Suppose that the boundary condition
∂v
∂r
(a,θ,t)= 0 , −π<θ≤π, 0 <t
were given instead ofv(a,θ,t)=f(θ ). Carry out the steps involved in sepa-
ration of variables. Show that the only change is in Eqs. (6) and (13), which
becomeR′(a)=0.
- One of the consequences of Green’s theorem is the integral relation
∫∫
R
(
f∇^2 g−g∇^2 f
)
dA=
∫
C
(
f
∂g
∂n−g
∂f
∂n
)
ds,
whereRis a region in the plane,Cis the closed curve that boundsR,and
∂f/∂nis the directional derivative in the direction normal to the curveC.
Use this relation to show that eigenfunctions of the problem
∇^2 φ=−λ^2 φ inR,
φ=0onC
are orthogonal if they correspond to different eigenvalues. (Hint: Use
f=φk,g=φm,m=k.)
- Same problem as Exercise 7, except the boundary condition is
φ+λ∂φ
∂n
=0onC.
5.5 Bessel’s Equation
In order to solve the Bessel equation,
(
rR′
)′
−μ
2
r
R+λ^2 rR= 0 , (1)
we apply the method of Frobenius. Assume thatR(r)has the form of a power
series multiplied by an unknown power ofr:
R(r)=rα
(
c 0 +c 1 r+···+ckrk+···