94 4. MAXIMUM PRINCIPLES
THEOREM 4.2 (scalar maximum principle, second version: lower bounds
are preserved for supersolutions). Let g (t) : t E [O, T) be a 1-parameter
family of Riemannian metrics and X (t) : t E [O, T) a 1-parameter family
of vector fields on a closed manifold Mn. Let u : Mn x [O, T) -+ JR be
a C^2 function. Suppose that there exists o: E JR such that u (x, 0) 2': o:
for all x E Mn and that u is a supersolution of the heat equation at any
(x, t) E Mn x [O, T) such that u (x, t) < o:. Then u (x, t) 2': o: for all x E Mn
and t E [O, T).
The idea of the proof is eminently simple: in essence, one just applies
the first and second derivative tests in calculus.
PROOF. If H : Mn x [O, T) -+JR is a C^2 function and (xo, to) is a point
and time where H attains its minimum among all points and earlier times,
namely
then
(4.2a)
(4.2b)
(4.2c)
H (xo, to) = min H,
Mnx[O,to]
aH
at (xo, to) :::;: 0,
V' H (xo, to) = 0,
l::!.H (xo, to) 2': 0.
Consider the function H defined by
H (x, t) ~ [u (x, t) - o:] +ct+ c:,
where c: is any positive number. Note that H 2': c: > 0 at t = 0. Using (4.1),
we find that H satisfies
(4.3)
aH
at 2: l::!.H + (X, V' H) + c:
at any point where u < o:. To prove the theorem, it will suffice to prove the
claim that H > 0 for all t E [O, T). To prove that claim, suppose that H:::;: 0
at some (x1, t1) E Mn x [O, T). Then since Mn is compact and H > 0 at
t = 0, there is a first time to E (0, t1] such that there exists a point x 0 E Mn
such that H (xo, to) = 0. Then since
u (xo, to) = o: - eta - c: < o:,
combining (4.2) with (4.3) implies that
aH
0 2': at (xo, to) 2: f:::.H (xo, to) + (X, V' H) (xo, to) + c: 2: c: > 0.
This contradiction proves the claim and hence the theorem. D