- PROVING THE GLOBAL ESTIMATES 229
In order to put (7.3) into the form of a heat equation, we need ~ \lk Rm.
Since for any tensor A, the commutator [Vk, ~] A is given by
we find that
k
[ vk, ~ J A = vk ~A - ~ vk A = L v.i Rm* vk-.i A,
.i=O
k
:t vk Rm=~ vk Rm+ L vJ Rm *vk-.i Rm.
.i=O
Substituting this formula into (7.3) and recalling that
2 (~A,A) = ~ JAJ^2 - 2 JVAJ^2 ,
we obtain
(7.4a)
k
(7.4b) + L v.i Rm*vk- j Rm*Vk Rm.
j=O
Now applying identity (7.4) in the case k = m, we get a differential inequality
:t JVm RmJ^2 :S ~ JVm RmJ^2 + f Cmj IVJ Rml -lvm-J Rml · IVm RmJ,
.i=O
where the constants Cmj depend only on j, m, and n. The inductive hy-
pothesis then gives an estimate
:t JVm RmJ^2 :S ~ JVm RmJ^2 + (cmo + Cmm) K JVm RmJ^2
(
~ Cj Cm-j ) K2 J m I
+ ki Cmj tJ/2 t(m- j)/2 \7 Rm
:S ~ JVm RmJ
2
+ K ( c:ri JVm RmJ
2
+ t~7 2 K JVm RmJ)
on the time interval 0 < t :S a/ K, where the constants c:n and c::i depend
only on m and n. Completing the square on the right-hand side and using
the fact that (a+ b)^2 :S 2 (a^2 + b^2 ) , we obtain Cm depending only on m and
n such that
(7.5) :t JVm RmJ^2 :S ~ JVm RmJ^2 + CmK (1vm RmJ^2 + ~~).
As in the case m = 1, we shall not try to control JVm RmJ^2 directly from
this equation; instead, we define