- BUSEMANN FUNCTIONS 309
and notice that the triangle inequality proves for all s 2 so that
Cs,Ts =d(a,1(s)) ~d(a(Ts 0 ),1(s))
(B. 7) ~ d ( C\'. ( Ts 0 ) , I (so)) + d (! (So) , I ( S)) = S - E.
Let !3s,o : [O, Cs,o] -+ Mn be a minimal geodesic such that !3s,O = a (0) =
x and !3s,o (Cs,o) = I (s), where Cs,O ~ L (!3s,o) = d (x, I (s)). Because
a (0), a (£) E IHI., =Mn\ UsE(O,oo) B (! (s), s), we have Ts E (0, £) and
(B.8) Cs,Ts < S ~ Cs,O·
In particular, we can apply the first variation formula at Ts to conclude
that a (Ts) J_ /Js,Ts (0). Thus we have constructed a right triangle with
vertices I ( s) , a (0) , a (Ts) and sides /3s,o, al [0,Ts], /3s,Ts. Since sect (g) 2 0, the
Toponogov comparison theorem implies that the hypotenuse length satisfies
the inequality
(B.9) Cs,O = L (/3s,o) ~ V L (aJ[O,Ts])
2
+ L (f3s,TJ
2
=VT}+ £~,Ts"
Recalling that Ts E [O, £] and combining inequalities (B.7), (B.8), and (B.9),
we see that IHI 1 can fail to be totally convex only if
S2 ~ T; + c;,Ts ~ g2 + c;,Ts ~ g2 + (s - c)2
for all s 2 so. Since£ and E are independent of s, this is impossible. D
3.3. Constructing totally convex sublevel sets. We are now ready
to construct the sublevel sets of the Busemann function associated to a point
OE Mn.
DEFINITION B.55. If 1 : [0, oo) -+ Mn is a ray and s E [0, oo), the
shifted ray Is : [O, oo) -+Mn is defined for all s' E [O, oo) by
Is ( s') ~ I ( s' + s).
Note that 10 = ')'. It is worth noting some elementary properties of the
half spaces associated to a shifted ray.
LEMMA B.56. Ifs ~ t, then lffi 1 t ~ lffi 1 s.
PROOF. For all r E [O, oo ), we have the inclusion
Hence
B (! ( t + r) , r) ~ B (! ( s + ( t - s + r)) , t - s + r) ~ IIB,,s.
IIB,,t ~ LJ B (! ( t + r) , r) ~ IIB,,s.
rE(O,oo)
LEMMA B.57. Whenever 0 < s < t,
IIB,,s = {x E Mn: d(x,IIB,,t) < t - s}.
D