- NOTES AND COMMENTARY 179
with JM Hi dμgi(o) E (0, 1] and with supp Hi C Bgi(o) (xoi, 20AiEoi) c
Bgi(o) (xoi, 1). Here the quantities in the integral on the LHS of (21.67)
are at time t = 0.
Let
and let
'l/J'f (x) ~ (2fit/^2 Hi(x, 0) = (27r)-n/^2 e-Mx,o).
We have supp 'I/Ji c Bi'Ji(o) ( xoi, 20 (2fi)-^1 l^2 Acoi), f Mi 'I/Jr dμi'Ji(o) E (0, 1],
and h = -~log (27r) - log'l/J'f. Hence, using Sn~ ~ log(27r) + n, inequality
(21.67) implies
!Mi (-~IV' log ( 1fJ'f) IEi(O) + ~log (27r) +log 'I/Jr + n) 'I/Jr dμi'Ji(O) ~ ~
1
'
so that
(21.68)
JMi ( 21\71/JilEi(o) - 'I/Jr log ( 1fJ'f) - sn'l/J'f) dμi'Ji(o) :::: -~
1
:::: -
13
; JMi 'I/Jr dμMo).
On the other hand, since
{ 'l/J'f dμi'Ji(O) ::; 1
}Mi
and since supp 'I/Ji c Bi'Ji(o) ( Xoi, (2fi)-^1!^2 ) from the choice of A, by using the
isoperimetric inequality (21.13) in the logarithmic Sobolev Theorem 22.19
(applied to 9i (0) on Bi'Ji(o) (xoi, (2fi)-^1 l^2 )) we have
{ (21\71/JilEi(0)-1/J'flog'l/J'f) dμi'Ji(O) ~ (sn+log(l-8i)) { 'l/J'fdμi'Ji(O)·
}Mi }Mi
This contradicts (21.68) since /31 > 0 is fixed, whereas bi ---+ 0.
REMARK 21.18. The assumption that R (x, 0) ~ -1 in Bg(O) (xo, 1) in
Theorem 21.9 is used in the proof of (22.82).
5. Notes and commentary
The original reference for pseudolocality and its variants is §10 of Perel-
man [152]; with regret, in this chapter we only discuss §10.1 and we do not
discuss §§10.2-10.5. Regarding further work on Perelman's pseudolocality,
one may also see the papers by Chau, Tam, Yu [26], Kleiner and Lott [110],
and Topping [179]. See also Chen and Yin [35], Hsu [101], Y. Wang [184],
and one of the authors [124].
§1. For large time, the bound IRml (x, t) ::; % can be a strong assump-
tion. By the proof of Theorem 16.2 in Hamilton [92] (see also Lemma 8.9
in [45]), we have the following.