1547845447-The_Ricci_Flow_-_Techniques_and_Applications_-_Part_IV__Chow_

(jair2018) #1

  1. CLASSIFYING THE BACKWARD POINTWISE LIMIT 103


Now let z = w - w. Then lieucZ = 0 in Bz 0 (r). Since z+ is subha rmonic on


B z 0 (r), by the mean value inequ ality we h ave that

On the other hand, since z+ :S: iil+ + lwl, we have


llz+llL1(B, 0 (r)) :S: llw+llL1(Bo(lzol+r)) + llwllL1(B, 0 (r))
:S: 7r ln iloo( O)(lzol + r)^2 + C(lzol + r, Umin(-1)) + C(r, c)
~C'

by (29.99) and (29.105). Hence llz+ llu-'°(B, 0 (3r/4)) :S: .,;-;2 C'.
This implies that

(29.106) (^0) < -uA eucW - - R ge w < R ge z++w _ < C ie w in Bz 0 (3r/4),
(^16) C' 1- 1


where C1 = e;;::-:r sup 8 2x(-oo,-l] R. By (29.104), we have that e w E Lq(Bz 0 (r)).


Now we may apply a standard interior elliptic estimate to (29.106) to obtain (see
Theorem 4.1 in [144])


llw+llL^00 (B, 0 (r/2)) :S: Cllw+llL1(B, 0 (3r/4)) + ClllieucWllLq(B, 0 (3r/4)) :S: C.


That is, u :S: ec in B z 0 (r/2). D


9.3. A nontrivial v 00 must vanish at no more than two zeros.


With the above lemma we can prove the following result. Note that by (29.47)
we have that v 00 has exactly two zeros for the King- Rosenau solution.


LEMMA 29.35 (Nontrivial v 00 have at most two zeros). For any ancient solution

on 52 , eith er v 00 = 0 or v 00 has at most two zeros.


PROOF. Suppose that v 00 is zero at distinct points N1, N2, and N3. We shall

then show that v 00 = 0. By applying a conformal diffeomorphism of 52 , we may


choose the north and south poles to satisfy v 00 (N) > 0 and v 00 (S) > 0. Note that


the points N, S, N 1 , N 2 , N 3 are distinct. Let O': 52 - {N}---+ JR^2 be stereographic
projection, so that O'(S) = 0 E JR^2 satisfies u 00 (0) < oo. Let zk = O'(Nk) for


k = 1,2,3. Let r > 0 be such that the balls Bzk(r) are disjoint. Let c E (0 , 47r/3).


Consider any sequence of times ti ---+ -oo. Since limi---+oo v(zk, ti) = 0, by Lemma


29.33 we have that for i sufficiently large


for each k = 1, 2, 3. Since the Bzk (r) are disjoint, we conclude that


3
r Rg(t;)dμg(t;) ;::::::: L r R9(t;)u(ti)dμeuc > 87r,
Js 2 k=l Js.k(r)

which contradicts the Gauss-Bonnet formula. D

Free download pdf