240 33. NONCOMPACT HYPERBOLIC LIMITS
Fix any time t 0 > 0, which will be chosen sufficiently large. Since the boundary
torus TA(t 0 ) in the hypothesis of Proposition 33.24 is convex and is assumed to be
compressible in M - MA(t 0 ) , we may apply Meeks and Yau's theorem, Theorem
33.25. Hence there exists a smooth embedded minimal disk Jo : D -t M - MA (to)
normal to TA (to) such that JolaD : 8D -t TA (to) represents a nontrivial primitive
element of ker (i*) c ?T 1 (TA (to)), where i : TA (to) -t M - MA (to) denotes the
inclusion map and where t he area of
(33.46) V(to) ~ Jo (D)
is least among all maps in J (to).
For the sake of a comparison argument in estimating ~(t 0 ), we shall now
define smoothly varying embedded disks Disk^0 (t) C M - MA (t) for t -t 0 suffi-
ciently small. First, extend the embedding J 0 to a smooth embedding lo defined in
an 77-neighborhood D^2 (1+77) of D = D^2 (1), where 77 > 0 is small. Then define the
embedded comparison disk at time t to be
(33.47) Disk^0 (t) ~lo (D^2 (1+77)) n M - MA (t).
By definition,
(33.48) -d+ d-A 'J (to):::; -d d I Areag(t) (. Disk^0 (t) ).
t t t=to
Note that Disk^0 (to) = Jo(D) = V(to). For t-t 0 sufficiently small, the disk Disk^0 (t)
bounds an embedded loop
Loop^0 (t) ~ 8Disk^0 (t) c TA (t)
and it is easy to see that Disk^0 (t) E J (t).
immortal asymptotically
hyperbolic piece
at time t 0
MA(to)
FIGURE 33.1. The disk V(to) in M - MA (t 0 ).