15.3. THE ELIMINATION OF Mr/CMf(V(Mf)) =Sa wr Z2 1123
LEMMA 15.3.9. V < 02(Y), so that Y ~ A4 x A4.
PROOF. Assume V = 02 (Y), or equivalently that Y ~ A 4 x A 4. By 15.3.7,
Y ~ M. As Aut(A4) ~ 84, Aut(Y) ~ 84 wr Z2 with CAut(Y)(V) = Autv(Y).
Thus YCM(V) = Y x CM(Y). Since Z has order 2 and CT(Y) :::l T, CM(Y) has
odd order; thus CM(Y) = 1 as F*(M) = 02 (M). Therefore M ::::; Aut(Y), so as
M ~ ot(2) by 15.3.2.1, we conclude M ~ 84 wr Z 2. But this is ruled out by
Theorem 13.9.1. D
15.3.2. Uniqueness theorems for Y and 02 (Cy(V;)). Our first main
goal, in Theorem 15.3.45 in this subsection, is to show that M = !M(Cy(Vi)8); to
do so, we first show that M = !M(Y8). We prove the two results simultaneously,
adopting a suitable hypothesis to cover both cases, and eventually establish the
common uniqueness result in 15.3.44.
Thus in this subsection, we assume:
HYPOTHESIS 15.3.10. Either
(1) Y+ := Y, or
(2) M = !M(Y8) and Y+ := 02 (Cy(V1)).
Let
H+ := H(Y+8, M) ={IE H(Y+8): Ii. M},
and write H+,* for the mimimal members of H+ under inclusion. As our goal
is to show that M = !M(Y+8), we will assume H+ is nonempty, and derive a
contradiction. Given IE H+, define Mr :=Mn I, Ur := (Zr), I* := I/Cr(Ur),
and R := 02(Y+8).
LEMMA 15.3.11. Assume IE H+. Then
(1) 8 E 8yh(I).
(2) Cr(Ur)::::; Mr.
(3) If case (2) of Hypothesis 15.3.10 holds, then Y+ = 02 (YnI) and Nc(Vi)::::;
M 2: Na(Y+) for i = 1, 2.
(4) Nr(Y+) =Mr.
(5) Either:
(i) Y+/0 2 (Y+) is Eg or 3i+^2 , Y+8/02,(Y+8) ~ 83 x 83, R = 02(Y8) :::1
YT, and R = CT(V). Further R = 02 (Nr(R)), RE 8yh((RM^1 )), and C(G,R) :S
M. Or:
(ii) Case (2) of Hypothesis 15.3.10 holds, Y+8/R ~ 83 , Y+ = 0
31
(Mr),
and R = Cs(V2).
(6) Y+ = B(Mr).
(7) F*(Mr) = 02(Mr).
(8) O(I) = 1.
(9) Nr· (Y-t') = Mj <I*, and Y-t' =f. 1.
(10) Either
(i) Baum(R) = Baum(8) and C(I, Baum(8))::::; Mr, or
(ii) Y+ = [Y+, J(8)], so Y-t' ::::; J(I)*.
(11) J(I)* i Mj.
(12) If L::::; I with [V, 02 (Y n L)] =J 1 and Li M, then no nontrivial charac-