120 9. SECOND SERIES OF IMPLICATIONS
and
'V;'(s) - "2'1;(s)^1 2 < I ( y(z(s)) f" ) I z'(s) I -^1 "2 I f" y(z(s))^12
I
(
::::; y(z(s)) f" ) I - "2 1 ( f" y(z(s)) )^21 = IS1(z(s))I
c
<------
- (length(!) - s)2
a.e. in [a, b). Thus
'VJ'(s) - ¢'(s) < ~('V;(s)^2 - ¢(s)^2 ) = ('V;(s) - ¢(s)) ( 'V;(s); ¢(s))
a.e. in [a, b), and we can apply Lemma 9.1.4 with u = '1; - ¢and v = ~('VJ+¢) to
conclude that
(9.1.8)
I
r f'(z(s)) I < 'V;(s)::::; ¢(s) = min(s,length(I)) ~
for s E [a,b).
Finally, we claim that b = length(!). Otherwise, (9.1.8) would imply that
f" / f' is bounded near z(b) and hence that f is analytic at z(b). In particular, we
would then get b' E (b, length(!)) such that f is analytic at z(s) for s E [a, b'),
contradicting the way b was chosen. This completes the proof of (9.1.7) and hence
of Lemma 9.1.5. 0
We show now that if D is uniform, then cr(D) > 0, i.e., functions analytic in D
are injective if their Schwarzian derivatives are small compared with the square of
the hyperbolic metric in D.
THEOREM 9.1.9. Suppose D is a simply connected domain in R^2 and suppose
there exists a constant c > 1 such that each z 1 , z 2 E D can be joined by an arc
"f c D so that
(9.1.10)
(9.1.11)
length(!) ::::; c iz1 - z2i,
min length(lj) ::::; c d1st(z, 8D)
J=l,2
for each z E "(, where "(1, "(2 are the components of "( \ { z}. If f is meromorphic
and locally injective in D and if
2 1
(9.1.12) sup IS1(z)IPD(z)- < - 3 ,
zED 16 C
then f is injective in D. Hence, in particular,
1
(9.1.13) cr(D) 2
16
c 3 ·
PROOF. Choose z1, z2 E D and let"( be an arc joining these points for which
(9.1.10) and (9.1.11) hold. Then by (3.2.1) and (9.1.13),
I
1 2 1 1
S1 (z) I ::::; 16 c3 PD(z) ::::; 4 c3 dist(z, 8D) 2
1 1
< - ----,--------.,---,-------,-
- 4c min(s,length(I)-s)2
(9.1.14)