11.1. HARMONIC BENDING AND QUASIDISKS 151
D /z2
___l__
...-; -...... ...... /
Z1 ---_.. / -_.. ------~·-_.,_ ---··-----
lg
.1 in n+in
n
0 f(z ) 1
lh
/1
_.r. f(l)
_L - - - - --.. - - - -- --H - - -
Hence
(11.1.5)
-^1 -in.
n n-in
(ho f)(z)
FIGURE 11.2
2 ( 1 ) 4 ( 1 ) l/2
= ;: arctan lf(zo)I = ;: arctan ~
and (11.1.2) follows from (11.1.3) and (11.1.4). D
The above argument shows that there exists an example for which inequality in
Lemma 11.1.1 is sharp whenever diam(!) :::; dist(zo, 1) and that the simpler bound
(11.1.6) w(zo,1;D):::;-^4 ( d't( diam(!) ) ) ~
7r lS zo, I
holds for each arc/ in aD and each point zo ED.
We turn now to the proof of the following characterization for quasidisks in
terms of harmonic bending.
THEOREM 3.9.3 (Fernandez-Hamilton-Heinonen [41]). A Jordan domain Dis
a K -quasidisk if and only if it has the harmonic bending property with constant c,
where K and c depend only on each other.
PROOF. For necessity assume that C = aD is a quasicircle. Let/ be a closed
arc of C with endpoints z 1 , z2 and consider z E C \ /· Then there exists a K -
-2 -
quasiconformal map f of R which maps C onto Rand C \/onto (0, 1). In order
to use Definition 3.9.2 of harmonic bending we consider a preliminary conformal