394 DAVID A. VOGAN, JR, ISOLATED UNITARY REPRESENTATIONS
unitary representation of G, andμ E (tc)* is an extremal weight of a representation
of K occurring in 7f. Let w be an element of the Weyl group of K with the property
thatμ - Pn is dominant for w6. + (£, tc). Finally let co denote the eigenvalu e of the
Casimir operator of G in T. Then
ffμ - Pn + WPcff
2
~Co+ ffpff
2
.
Generally one requires not only t hat μ be an extremal weight, but also that it be
dominant for 6. (£, tc). But replacing μ by the conjugate dominant weight can only
decrease the left side of the inequality we want ([VZ], Lemma 4.3); so this version
of the inequality follows.
The representation 7fL contains a unique representation 7fLnK of L n K, of
highest weight d1fL = ,\-p. (Equations (16)(c) and (d) allow us to regard A and p
as weights in W)* .) Equation (15)(b) says that this representation of L n K must
appear in Hr-^1 (u, T). A Hochschild-Serre spectral sequence ([Green], Theorem
5.2.2) then produces an irreducible representation TK of K appearing in T, and
non-negative integers x and y with the properties that 7fLnK occurs in
!\r-x(u n p) 0 HY(u n e, TK),
and that x - y = 1. We can analyze this condition as in the proof of Proposition
5.4.2 in [Green]. The conclusion is that there are
- a highest weight μ' of TK;
- x distinct weights {,8 1 , ... , .Bx} of Tc in u n p;
- an element () E Wl of length y;
with the property that
dμ' +Pc) - Pc - 2p(un P) + 2-.:.Bi = ,-p. (18)(a)
Here We^1 is Kostant's cross section for the cosets of the Weyl group Wrne (of tc in
( n £)in We, and the right side is just the differential of t he weight 7fLnK_ (It is at
this point that the hypothesis that L has compact center is used: it guarantees that
,\vanishes on ac. In the general case we would have to put >-ftc in (18)(a). In the
Dirac operator inequality ((18)(d) below) it would still be>-appearing on the right,
and we would no longer be able to draw strong conclusions from the inequality.)
We want to apply Lemma 1 7 to T and the extremal weight () μ'. For this purpose
we define an element w E We by the requirement that
w6. +(e, tc) ={a E 6.(£, tc)f (a,()μ' -Pn) < O} U {a E -6. +(e, tc)f (a, ()μ^1 - Pn) = O}.
From (18)(a) we calculate
(18)(b)
The last term in parentheses is minus the sum of the roots { aj} of tc in e that are
positive for () 6. + (£, tc) but negative for w6. + (£, tc). It is an easy consequence of the
definition of w that these roots must all belong to 6. + (£, tc). Therefore
(18)(c)
The last term in brackets is a sum of distinct positive roots of tc in g.