30 2. Nuclear and Exact C* -Algebrasmaps ,(/;n : Mk( n) ( <C) EB <C --+ B and one checks that { ,(/;n o <Pn} converges in
the point-norm topology to e.^3
In the case that both A and Bare nonunital we get u.c.p. maps <Pn: A--+
Mk(n)(<C)EB<Cjust as in the previous paragraph. Regarding Bas a subalgebra
of Band the 1/Jn's as taking values in B, we again invoke the previous lemma
to get u.c.p. maps ,(/;n: Mk(n)(<C) EB <C--+ B. Another standard computation
completes the proof. DThe previous result will usually allow us to assume that our algebras are
unital. In most cases, we can further reduce to the case of unital maps.
Lemma 2.2.5. If 0: A --+ Mn(<C) is c.p. and A is unital, then there exists
a u. c. p. map <p : A --+ Mn ( <C) such that for all a E A we have
1 1
0( a) = 0(1A) 2 <p( a )rp(lA) 2.Proof. In the case that 0(1A) is an invertible matrix this result is trivial
as one simply defines
1 1
cp(a) = 0(1A)-2r:p(a)rp(lA)-2
for all a E A. The general case is more technical but similarly simple.
If P denotes the projection onto the kernel of 0(1A) and PJ_ = 1-Pis
the orthogonal complement, then
rp(a) = PJ_rp(a) = rp(a)PJ_
for all a E A. Evidently it suffices to see this in the case that 0 :::; a :::; lA
and then it is a consequence of the fact that 0 :::; rp(a) :::; rp(lA) (since this
implies the kernel of 0(1A) is contained in the kernel of rp(a)).
Applying the trick from the first part of the proof, we can find a u.c.p.
map <p1: A--+ PJ_Mn(<C)PJ_ as in the statement of the lemma. To complete
the proof, we just take any state 'f}: A --+ <C and define a u.c.p. map <p: A--+
Mn(<C) by <p(a) = <p1(a) EB rJ(a)P. D
Proposition 2.2.6. If(): A --+ B is a unital nuclear map, then there exist
u.c.p. maps <fn: A--+ Mk(n)(<C) and 1/Jn: Mk(n)(<C) --+ B such that 1/Jn o <{Jn --+
() in the point--norm topology.Proof. Let 0n: A--+ Mk(n)(<C) and ,(/;n: Mk(n)(<C)--+ B be c.c.p. maps whose
compositions converge in the point-norm topology to (). By the previous
lemma we can find u.c.p. maps <{Jn: A-+ Mk(n)(<C) such that
1 1
<Pn(a) = 0n(lA)2<pn(a)<fn(lA)2
for all a E A. These will be the first replacements we need.
(^3) 0£ course, one now applies Exercise 2.1.2 to complete the proof.