1550251515-Classical_Complex_Analysis__Gonzalez_

(jair2018) #1
558 Chapters

Proof As a preliminary step we shall prove the so-called Abel's formula of
summation by parts; namely, if {bn} and {en} are any two sequences, then
n+p n+p
L bk(ek - ek-1) = bn+pCn+p - bnen - L (bk - bk-1)ek-1 (8.7-1)
k=n+l k=n+l
In fact, we have
n+p n+p n+p
L bk(ek - ck-1) = L bkck - L bkek-1
f,=n+l k=n+l k=n+l
n+p-1 n+p
= bn+pen+p - bnen + L bkek - L bkck-1
k=n k=n-1-1
n+p n+p
= bn+pen+p - bnen + L bk-lek-1 - L bkek-1
k=n+l k=n+l
n+p
= bn+pen+p - bnen - L (bk - bk-1)ek-1
k=n+l
Now if we apply (8.7-1) to the partial remainder of the power series, that is,
n+p ·'
Rn,p(z) = .W ''""' akz k , n 2:: 0, p 2::^1
k=n+l

with bn == zn and Cn = l:~n+l ak, we obtain, noting that en -Cn-1 = -an,


n+p
Rn,p(z) = - L bk(ek - ek-1)
k=n+l
n+p
= - Cn+pzn+p + enZn + L (zk - Zk-l)ek-1 (8.7-2)
k=n+l

Since L: an converges, we have en ---+ 0 as n ---+ oo. Hence if we take Jzl < 1


and let .P ---+ oo, (8.7-2) gives
00 00
Rn(z) = L akzk = CnZn - (1-z) L zk-lek-l (8.7-3)
k=n+l k=n+l


For any given e > 0 there exists N such that n 2:: N implies Jeni < e.


Thus for n 2:: N we have


1-Rn(z)I < e(l + 11-zl ~ izlk-l) = e (1 + ~


1
_=-
1

;:) (8.7-4)
Free download pdf