66 Scientific American September 2018
By around 40000 years ago based on current
evidence H. sapiens found itself all alone the only
remaining member of what was once an incredibly
diverse family of bipedal primates together known
as hominins. (In this article the terms âhumanâ and
âhomininâ both refer to H. sapiens and its extinct
relatives.) How did our kind come to be the last hu-
man standing?
Until a few years ago scientists favored a simple
explanation: H. sapiens arose relatively recently in
more or less its current form in a single region of
Africa and spread out from there into the rest of
the Old World supplanting the Ne and er tals and
other archaic human species it encountered along
the way. There was no appreciable interspecies frat-
ernizing just wholesale replac ement of the old
guards by the clever newcomer whose ascendancy
seemed inevitable.
Ye t mounting evidence from fossil and archaeo-
logical discoveries as well as DNA analyses has ex -
perts increasingly rethinking that scenario. It now
looks as though H. sapiens originated far earlier
than previously thought possibly in locations across
Africa instead of a single region and that some of
its distinguishing traitsâincluding aspects of the
brainâ evolved piecemeal. Moreover it has become
abundantly clear that H. sapiens actually did mingle
with the other human species it encountered and
that interbreeding with them may have been a cru-
cial factor in our success. Together these findings
paint a far more complex picture of our origins than
many researchers had envisionedâone that privileg-
es the role of dumb luck over destiny in the success
of our kind.
THEORY UNDER THREAT
DEEATE AEOUT THE ORIGIN of our species has traditional-
ly focused on two competing models. On one side was
the Recent African Origin hypothesis championed by
paleoanthropologist Christopher Stringer and others
which argues that H. sapiens arose in either eastern or
southern Africa within the past 200000 years and
because of its inherent superiority subsequently re-
placed archaic hominin species around the globe with-
out interbreeding with them to any significant de-
gree. On the other was the Multiregional Evolution
model formulated by paleoanthropologists Milford
Wolpoff Xinzhi Wu and the late Alan Thorne which
holds that modern H. sapiens evolved from Ne an de r-
tals and other archaic human populations through-
out the Old World which were connected through
migration and mating. In this view H. sapiens has far
deeper roots reaching back nearly two million years.
By the early 2000s the Recent African Origin mod-
el had a wealth of evidence in its favor. Analyses of the
DNA of living people indicated that our species origi-
nated no more than 200000 years ago. The earliest
known fossils attributed to our species came from two
sites in Ethiopia Omo and Herto dated to around
195000 and 160000 years ago respectively. And se-
quences of mitochondrial DNA (the tiny loop of genet-
ic material found in the cellâs power plants which is
different from the DNA contained in the cellâs nucle-
us) recovered from Ne an der tal fossils were distinct
from the mitochondrial DNA of people todayâexactly
as one would expect if H. sapiens replaced archaic hu-
man species without mating with them.
Not all of the evidence fit with this tidy story
however. Many archaeologists think that the start of
A
T THE DAWNING OF HOMO SAPIE
S OUR ANCESTORS WERE EORN INTO
a world we would find utterly surreal. Itâs not so much that the
climate and sea levels or the plants and the animals were differ-
ent although of course they wereâitâs that there were other
kinds of humans alive at the same time. For most of H. sapiensâ
existence in fact multiple human species walked the earth.
In Africa where our species got its start large-brained Homo
heidelbergensis and small-brained Homo naledi also roamed. In Asia there was Homo erectus
a mysterious group dubbed the Denisovans and later Homo floresiensis âa hobbitlike creature
tiny but for its large feet. The stocky heavy-browed Neandertals for their part ruled Europe
and western Asia. And there were probably even more forms as yet undiscovered.
IN BRIEF
Until recently the domi-
nant model of human
origins held that Homo
sapiens arose in a single
region of Africa and
replaced archaic human
species throughout the
Old World without inter-
breeding with them.
%yÄ Ìm ÌÂÃ¥from
archaeology paleontol -
ogy and genetics are
rewriting that story.
The ÌDïyåïà yÃ¥yDà `Â
suggests that H. sapiens
emerged from groups
located across Africa
and that interbreeding
with other human
species contributed to
our success.