The Economist - USA (2019-11-23)

(Antfer) #1

76 Books & arts The EconomistNovember 23rd 2019


2

1

lies took on their Chinese counterparts on
the quiet, preferring not to disrupt diplo-
macy. In any case, this was a slippery adver-
sary to grapple with. In “Chinese Spies:
From Chairman Mao to Xi Jinping”, Roger
Faligot, a French author, relates the verdict
of an fbispy-hunter: the trouble with the
job is that most targets don’t look or act like
spies. They are not cloak-and-dagger types
with handlers, cut-outs and dead drops;
rather, they tend to be “academics, stu-
dents, businessmen or journalists”.
Poison-tipped umbrellas are no longer
the tools of the espionage trade. Instead it
relies on employees at American or Euro-
pean technology and defence firms taking
home extra files—or photographing a com-
puter screen on their smartphone, as in a
recent case involving technology for a self-
driving car in which the fbi arrested an en-
gineer at Apple. China also acquires know-
how by funding scientists at American in-
stitutions; some set up “shadow labs” in
China that mirror their work in America.
Invoking a Chinese term, Mr Faligot de-
scribes this multipronged approach to in-
telligence collection as the “sea-lamprey
strategy”. This “slippery, greenish fish
blends with the seascape”, then latches on
to its prey, “siphoning off its blood through
its multiple orifices”, Mr Faligot writes
evocatively. Too evocatively, perhaps.
Readers of his engrossing book might be
prone to find Chinese spies everywhere,
lurking like “deep-water fish” in Chinese
communities from Vancouver to Sydney.
Under President Donald Trump, Ameri-
ca’s authorities have sometimes seemed
inclined to do just that. Given China’s stri-
dent authoritarianism, the fear is under-
standable. But the amorphous nature of the
threat demands a cool assessment. In their
book, Mr Mattis and Mr Brazil provide a
useful field guide to Chinese intelligence
services, from the distrust and purges that
weakened them under Mao to their more
professional incarnations today. They also
supply an eye-opening compendium of
confirmed cases of Chinese skulduggery.
Even so, charting the Chinese threat re-
mains a work in progress.
In many instances it is hard to discern
how much damage has really been done by
Chinese agents to other national interests,
whether in America or elsewhere. Some-
times it is not clear that a Chinese agent is
really a “spy”, as opposed to a businessman
or student caught up in machinations larg-
er than they appreciate. As the spy games
become more complex and sophisticated,
blunt crackdowns and blanket suspicions
may be as damaging to Western societies—
and the rights of innocent people—as na-
ivety is to national security. The shadowy
nature of espionage calls for democracies
to be extra-vigilant, not only about spies
but, just as important, about those respon-
sible for hunting them. 7

W


hen theauthors of thisexcellent
bookwereawardedtheNobelprize
foreconomicslastmonth,Frenchmedia
crowedthata Frenchwomanhadwonit;In-
dianmediathatanIndian-borneconomist
andhis wifehad doneso.Mostreports
eventuallymentionedthattheirnational
championwasnotthesolelaureate.Butthe
parochialismof theheadlines bears out
oneofthebook’scentralobservations.
Theworldismessierthanconventional
economicmodelsassume.Peoplerespond
notonlytomaterialincentivesbutalsoto
thepulloftribeandcustom.Theyarenot
onlyrationalbutalsoemotional,supersti-
tiousandattachedtothefamiliar.Allecon-
omistsknowthattheirmodelsoversimpli-
fy—thatiswhatmodelsarefor.Butfew
have grappled as energetically withthe
complexityofreallifeasEstherDufloand
AbhijitBanerjee,orgottheirbootsasdirty
intheprocess.
Thecouplearebestknown,alongwith
their fellow Nobel laureate Michael
Kremer,forpioneeringtheuseofrando-
mised controlled trials to answer eco-
nomicquestions.Anearlierbook,“Poor
Economics”,isfullofpowerfulexamples.
Toseewhethersmallloansimprovethe

lives of thepoor,theteampersuadeda
microlenderinHyderabadtoexpandinto
somerandomlyselecteddistrictsbutnot
others. (They found that microcredit
works, but not as well as its boosters
claim.)Inanothertrial,theyfoundthatIn-
dianteachersweremorelikelytoshowup
to workiftheyweremadetotakedate-
stampedphotosofthemselves,andtheir
paywasdockedif theymissedclasses.
“GoodEconomicsforHardTimes”is
morewide-ranging.It reviewstheevidence
forwhatworksandwhatdoesn’tintack-
lingsomeoftheworld’sbiggestproblems,
fromclimatechangetotrade.Theauthors
admitthattheirknowledgeisimperfect
and their proposals will need refining.
They don’t claim to understand what
causes rapid economic growth, for in-
stance.Theywouldfarratheryouabsorbed
their evidence-based, trial-and-error
methodthananyspecificpolicy.
Theresultisa treasuretroveofinsight.
They describe howcaste politicsfosters
corruption, how potential migrants can
overcometheirfearoftheunknown,and
how,whengovernmentposts areexces-
sivelywell-paid,astheyareinseveralpoor
countries,freshgraduatesremainjobless
foryearsratherthansettleforaprivate-
sectorposition.
Theauthorsarefascinatedbywhatmo-
tivatespeople,andhowthisvariesbysocial
context.Inanexperimentinvolvingcoin-
flippingforcashrewards,Swissbankers
aremorelikelytocheatif remindedbefore-
handthattheyarebankers,lesssoifthey
areaskedtotalkaboutwhattheydointheir
leisuretime.In“banker”mode,itseems,
peoplearemoreruthlesslyacquisitivethan
whenin“volunteerfootballcoach”mode.
Ina similarexperiment,studentsinIndia
cheated more whenremindedthatthey
hopedonedaytoworkforthegovernment;
forstudentsinDenmark,theoppositewas
true.A government’sreputationforcor-
ruptionorcleanliness“affectsthehonesty
ofthosewhowanttoworkforit”,suggest
theauthors.
Thinking about inequality, they are
scepticalaboutthefashionableideathat
richcountriesshouldoffereverycitizena
“universalbasicincome”.Therealcrisisin
suchplacesisnotmaterialdeprivationbut
that“manypeoplewhousedto thinkof
themselvesasmiddleclasshavelostthe
senseofself-worththattheyusedtoderive
fromtheirjobs.”Inpoorcountries,bycon-

Problem-solving

Boots on the ground


GoodEconomicsforHardTimes.By
AbhijitBanerjeeandEstherDuflo.
PublicAffairs; 432 pages;$30.AllenLane;£25

The pursuit of reason

The meaning of two Nobel-prizewinning economists’ work lies in their method
Free download pdf