TheEconomistNovember 23rd 2019 81
Less More
0 510
Nodata
Nodata
-2
-1
0
1
2
0246810
↑
Moretrustingofstrangers,
individualisticandindependent
Moreconformist,obedient
andloyaltogroup
↓
Western/Catholic Eastern/Orthodox Negligiblechurchinfluence*
Individualistic-impersonal
psychologyscale
Centuriesofchurchinfluence,500-1500AD,takinginsubsequentmigrations
United
States
Chad
Egypt
Japan
India
China
Indonesia
Saudi
Arabia
Greece
Albania
Russia
Italy
Britain France
Sweden
Finland
Israel
Spain
Denmark
Switzerland
SouthAfrica
Turkey
Paraguay
Bolivia
Mexico
Argentina
Brazil
Canada
Germany
NewZealand
Australia
South
Korea
Therelationshipisweakerfor
theEasternOrthodoxchurch,
whichwasmoretolerantof
marriagebetweenrelatives
Source:“TheChurch,intensivekinshipandpsychologicalvariation”,by
JonathanSchulzandJosephHeinrichetal.,Science, November 2019
*0-30years
TimeunderChristianityintheMiddleAgesv socialattitudes
Byprimarychurchexposure
CenturiesofChristianinfluence,500-1500AD
Takinginsubsequentpopulationmigrations
Kinshipintensityindex,includingcousinmarriage,
extendedfamiliescohabiting,polygamy,marryingwithin
thecommunity
PopulationsoriginatinginareasthatspentlongerundermedievalCatholicismaremoretrustingandlessconformist
W
hy somecountries are rich and oth-
ers are poor is an enduring debate in
economics. Natural resources and friendly
climates help only a bit. In contrast, robust
political institutions and a steady rule of
law seem essential. But why did these pre-
cursors evolve in just a few dozen states?
One oft-cited theory, advanced by Rob-
ert Putnam of Harvard University, is that
the crucial ingredient is “social capital”, the
affinity people feel for members of their
society whom they do not know. Proxies for
this sentiment, such as blood-donation
rates or propensity to return a stranger’s
lost wallet, closely track gdpper person.
Social capital can take centuries to
amass. Mr Putnam has shown that parts of
Italy that were ruled by a feudal monarchy
around 1300adhave low levels of social
trust and are relatively poor today. In con-
trast, the Italian regions that formed city-
states in that era, where citizens banded to-
gether for commerce and self-defence, are
now unusually rich and well-run.
A recent study by Jonathan Schulz, Jo-
seph Henrich and two other scholars pro-
poses an explanation that delves even fur-
ther back in time. They focus on family
structure. Until recent human history, peo-
ple lived in small groups and often married
relatives. These habits reinforced family
ties, but made people wary of outsiders.
In Europe this started to change around
500 ad, when the Catholic church began
banning polygamy and marriages between
cousins, or between widows or widowers
and their dead spouses’ siblings. These
edicts forced unmarried men to venture
out and meet women from different social
groups. The paper says that this reduced
Christians’ “conformity and in-group loy-
alty”, and made them trust strangers more.
By expanding the community beyond
clans, it helped create the broad solidarity
on which development may depend.
To show that Christian dogma caused
this shift, the authors match historical data
on the spread of religion with modern indi-
cators. In places where Catholicism was
generally the leading religion from 500-
1500 ad, people score highly on measures
of independence, impartiality and trust—
such as agreeing to testify against a friend
whose reckless driving killed a pedestrian.
The same pattern occurs in countries set-
tled mostly by Christian migrants, such as
America. In contrast, social trust is lower
and marriage between cousins is relatively
common in areas whose populations do
not descend from medieval Catholics.
This effect distinguishes Catholicism
from other strands of medieval Christian-
ity. Years spent before 1500adunder East-
ern Orthodoxy, which the authors say did
less to police marriage within families, was
a weaker predictor of “pro-social” survey
responses than exposure to Catholicism
was. Moreover, the trend holds up both be-
tween and within countries. Among Italian
regions, those with high social capital (as
measured by data like using cheques over
cash) were influenced by Catholicism for
longer than those lacking it were.
The study’s subject limits the strength
of its findings. Barring an experiment to as-
sign religions to countries at random and
monitor them for 1,500 years, no one can
prove whether incest bans built social trust
or merely coincided with it. Nonetheless,
the paper bolsters the case for studying an-
cient history to understand the present. 7
Medieval Catholicism nudged Europe
towards democracy and development
God and Mammon
Graphic detailCulture and development