Newsweek - USA (2019-11-29)

(Antfer) #1

NEWSWEEK.COM 29


“The term ‘anything of value’Ūis broad


in scope and contains no language


restricting its application to transactions


involving money, goods, and services,” the


federal court of appeals in New Orleans


wrote in a bribery case in 1. “The plain


meaning of the statute compels our con


clusion that ‘anything of value’Ūincludes


transactions involving intangible items”Ŝ


in that instance, conjugal visits at a prison.


Other hardtoquantify services and


beneɿts have formed the basis of suc


cessful bribery prosecutions. These have


included the granting of lenient conditions


of pretrial release, the giving of commer


cially worthless stock that might later gain


value, andŜperhaps most relevant hereŜ


an agreement not to run in a primary


election. My quick review of the case law


suggests that at least ɿve federal circuit


courts of appeals have found the phrase


“anything of value” to include intangible


or hardtoquantify beneɿts in bribery


cases, while none has ruled otherwise.


“I think there is a solid basis for DO-


to investigate these actions as poten


tial bribery violations,” says Eliason, of


*eorge Washington 8 niversity, in an


email. “That would probably require the


appointment of a new special counselŜ


and you can assess for yourself how likely


that is with >Bill@ Barr as Attorney *eneral.”


*erson, on the other hand, disfavors


the involvement of a special prosecutor.


He is more trusting of both Barr and his


departmentŜeven though he disagrees


with the department’s interpretation


of the campaignɿnance law in this


case and, prior to that, took issue with


Barr’s characterization of the Mueller


report. “I believe in the institution and


the quality of the career people who


are in it,” he says. As an assistant 8 .S.


attorney in the early 1s, *erson led


a landmark prosecution of a sitting 8 .S.


senator under 18 8 SC Section 1.


*erson even wonders whether Trump’s


conduct might eventually come under


scrutiny in an inquiry that is already


underway. The Southern District of New


York’s current reported probe into Ru


dolph *iuliani for his 8 krainerelated work,


which has already led to the indictment


of four people, might eventually require


an e[amination of Trump’s acts. “This all


ties back to the 8 kraine,” *erson says.


“It all ties back to the same situation.”


If *erson is wrong, though, the


department’s inaction to date could only


mean one of two other things. Perhaps


the department has decided that the im


peachment inquiry is sufɿcient to ʀesh


out the facts and mete out a punishment.


Certainly an impeachment inquiry is


appropriate. Bribery is an e[plicit consti


tutional grounds for impeachment “trea


son, bribery, or other high crimes or mis


demeanors” , as Eliason points out. And


since the “thing of value” involved here


was coming from the 8 kraine, *erson


notes, it could be a foreign emolument,


tooŜyet another basis for impeachment.


But the absence of a parallel criminal


inquiry tends to demean the seriousness


of the allegations in the eyes of both the


public and the impeachment jurorsŜ


the senators. And if the President is


ultimately acquitted of impeachment ar


ticles by political allies fearful of facing


primary opponents, nothing will protect


the public from criminally corrupt


e[ecutive acts for the remainder of this


presidential term and, perhaps, the ne[t.


The last possibility is more concerning


still. Maybe the -ustice Department has


quietly decided that a sitting President is,


as his personal lawyers recently argued


in state court in Manhattan, not merely


immune from prosecution during his


termŜwhich many legal scholars have


long assumedŜbut immune even from


all criminal investigation. That audacious


contention has been widely criticized


as radically at odds with the nation’s


history and constitutional consensus.


Still, the department’s silence in


the face of mounting evidence of


Presidential criminality does raise that


distinct possibility.


Ơ Roger Parloff is a regular contributor


to Newsweek and Yahoo Finance. He


is an attorney who no longer practic-


es, and who has been writing about


legal matters for more than 30 years.

Free download pdf