PC World - USA (2019-12)

(Antfer) #1
78 PCWorld DECEMBER 2019

REVIEWS GOOGLE PIXELBOOK GO


tasks, if not graphics-
intensive or gaming
applications. The proof is
in the performance charts
below.
The cr-XPRT
performance test
measures Chromebook
performance in basic
productivity tasks as well
as more demanding
activities, such as
watching movies or
playing games. The HP
Chromebook x360 14
g1, which sports a more
powerful U-series Core
chip, leads by a wide
margin, but the
Pixelbook Go heads up
the middle of the pack.
Basemark is another
broad-based benchmark,
incorporating web
real-time graphics using
WebGL and JavaScript
frameworks. The
Pixelbook Go does even
better in this test, creating
its own place between
the middle of the pack
and the leader.
Mozilla developed
the Kraken JavaScript

The Pixelbook Go posted a good score in Cr-XPRT, not far behind the
leaders in this broad-based test suite.

HP Chrom(Core i5-8350U)ebook x360 14 g1
Google Pixel Slate (Core i5-8200Y)
Google Pixelbook Go(Core i5-8200Y)
Goolge Chromebook Pixel 2
(Core i5-5200U)
HP Chromebook x2
(Intel Core m3-7Y30)
HP Chromebook 14
(AMD A4-9120C)
Lenovo 500e Chrom(Celeron N3450) ebook

CrXPRT-2015
(Performance)

LONGER BARS INDICATE BETTER PERFORMANCE

269

196

205

106

229

110.5

198

The Pixelbook Go jumps ahead of the pack in the Basemark test suite, led
only by a Chromebook with a much more powerful CPU.

HP Chrom(Core i5-8350U)ebook x360 14 g1
Google Pixelbook Go(Core i5-8200Y)
Google Pixel Slate (Core i5-8200Y)
Goolge Chromebook Pixel 2
(Core i5-5200U)
HP Chromebook x2
(Intel Core m3-7Y30)
HP Chromebook 14
(AMD A4-9120C)
Lenovo 500e Chrom(Celeron N3450) ebook

Basemark Web 3.0
(General)

LONGER BARS INDICATE BETTER PERFORMANCE

673.65

426.77

494.35

169

555.23

279.39

479.32
Free download pdf