Los Angeles Times - 02.11.2019

(Barry) #1

C2 LATIMES.COM/BUSINESS


BUSINESS BEAT


The Trump administra-
tion is planning to require
automakers to modestly
bolster fuel economy and
pare tailpipe emissions after
2020, a reversal from its earli-
er proposal to freeze require-
ments through 2026.
Administration officials
have tentatively agreed to
the change, according to a
person familiar with the
matter who asked for ano-
nymity because the deliber-
ations are private.
The moderation of the
rollback comes amid a
widening schism in the auto
industry over Trump’s plan
to slash the fuel-efficiency
standards and strip Califor-
nia of its authority to regu-
late tailpipe greenhouse gas
emissions.
At issue is a proposal
from the U.S. Environmen-
tal Protection Agency and
the Transportation Depart-
ment to ease Obama-era
greenhouse gas emission
and fuel economy stand-
ards. Under the August 2018
proposal, those require-
ments would have been
capped at a 37-mile-per-gal-
lon fleetwide average after


2020, rather than increasing
to roughly 50 mpg by 2025, as
under current regulations
set during the Obama ad-
ministration.
Administration officials
now plan to require 1.5% an-
nual increases in fleetwide
efficiency of new autos. EPA
Administrator Andrew
Wheeler has telegraphed the
shift, which was reported by
the Wall Street Journal on
Thursday evening, saying
the final plan will not look
exactly like the proposal ad-
vanced in August 2018.
The latest plan could still
change before the final rule
is published.
In a related action, the
administration in Septem-
ber moved to strip California
of its authority to limit
greenhouse gas emissions
from vehicles. More than 20
states and several environ-
mental organizations have
challenged the administra-
tion’s action in separate law-
suits.
The Trump administra-
tion argued that its original
proposal would lower costs
and save lives by encourag-
ing motorists to replace old-
er, less-safe vehicles with
newer models. But that led
to fierce criticism from envi-
ronmentalists and Califor-
nia officials, who said it
would increase pollution.
Some automakers objected
to the proposed freeze and
urged the White House to
soften the measure, saying
they would favor rules that
supported annual fuel effi-
ciency gains and emissions

reductions.
“The Trump administra-
tion is focusing on finalizing
the SAFE rule, which will de-
liver one national standard
to the American auto mar-
ket,” said EPA spokesman
Michael Abboud. A spokes-
man for the National High-
way Traffic Safety Adminis-
tration, the Transportation
Department agency respon-
sible for its share of the rule,
declined to comment.

While the plan amounts
to a less-aggressive rollback,
environmental and con-
sumer advocates warned it
would still produce negative
outcomes. Consumer Re-
ports estimated that con-
sumers would spend $3,
more in fuel costs under the
plan than under the current
standards for a model-year
2026 vehicle, for example.
“A rollback on the scale
reported would result in mil-

lions of tons of additional
carbon pollution in the air
and higher costs for drivers
at the pump,” Luke
Tonachel, director for clean
cars and clean fuels at the
Natural Resources Defense
Council said in a statement.
“This plan is absurd and
calling it anything other
than a disaster for our cli-
mate is ridiculous.”
Stanley Young, spokes-
man for the California Air

Resources Board, said a fed-
eral rule cutting emissions
1.5% per year isn’t enough for
the state to meet its air qual-
ity and climate change goals.
“The rumored federal pro-
posal would compromise
our ability to meet federal air
quality standards and would
directly impact public
health,” he said in an email.
While auto industry
groups have repeatedly said
they support fuel efficiency
improvements, Gloria Berg-
quist, a spokeswoman for
the Alliance of Automobile
Manufacturers, said the
group wanted to see the full
details in the final rule be-
fore taking a position. “We
are pleased that the admin-
istration seems focused on
increasing standards while
still aligning them with the
marketplace and what con-
sumers are buying.”
Ford Motor Co., Volks-
wagen AG, BMW AG and
Honda Motor Co. in July re-
jected Trump’s proposal
and agreed to compromise
efficiency standards — in-
cluding 3.7% annual strin-
gency gains — offered by Cal-
ifornia regulators.
Earlier this week, a sepa-
rate coalition including Gen-
eral Motors Co., Toyota Mo-
tor Corp., Fiat Chrysler Au-
tomobiles NV and several
other carmakers moved to
back the Trump administra-
tion in one of the lawsuits to
block its rule to strip Califor-
nia of its tailpipe powers.

Beene and Dlouhy write for
Bloomberg.

EPA signals a shift on fuel economy


Contrary to earlier


proposal, government


said to back requiring


carmakers to modestly


boost standards.


By Ryan Beene and
Jennifer A. Dlouhy


THE MODERATION of the rollback comes amid a widening schism in the auto
industry over the administration’s plan to slash the fuel-efficiency standards.

Luis SincoLos Angeles Times

WASHINGTON — U.S.
employers added a solid
128,000 jobs in October, a fig-
ure that was held down by a
now-settled strike against
General Motors that caused
tens of thousands of workers
to be temporarily counted as
unemployed.
The unemployment rate
ticked up from 3.5% to 3.6%,
still near a five-decade low.
And for a second straight
month, average hourly
wages rose a decent if less-
than-robust 3% from a year
ago.
All told, the October em-
ployment report from the
government pointed to a
still-sturdy job market that
remains a key source of
strength for a U.S. economy
that’s been weakened by
trade wars and a global slow-
down.
The solid jobs data will
also make it even less likely
that the Federal Reserve,
which cut short-term inter-
est rates this week for a third
time this year, will do so
again anytime soon.
The GM strike contrib-
uted to the temporary loss
last month of 41,600 auto fac-
tory and likely other related
jobs. But the settlement
seems sure to lead to a re-
turn of those jobs in the com-
ing months. The report re-
vised upward job gains in the
prior two months by a com-
bined 95,000, suggesting a
healthier job market than
initially believed.
Another drag on hiring
last month was the U.S. Cen-
sus. The government let go
of 20,000 temporary workers
who had been helping pre-
pare for the 2020 survey.
Job growth so far this
year has averaged just
167,000 a month, down from
an average of 223,000 in 2018,
according to Labor Depart-
ment figures.
Even so, hiring remains
high enough to keep the un-
employment rate from rising
despite the tepid pace of
economic growth. On
Wednesday, the government
estimated that the economy
grew in the July–October
quarter at a modest 1.9% an-
nual rate.
The economy has been
expanding for more than a
decade, the longest period of

growth on record. But the
bump from the 2018 tax cuts
are fading, and an aging
population and other demo-
graphic forces are holding
back potential growth.
Surveys also suggest that
employers have turned cau-
tious in large part because of
heightened uncertainties
caused by President
Trump’s trade conflicts. The
president has imposed tar-
iffs on many goods imported
to the U.S., and other na-
tions have retaliated with
import taxes on U.S. ex-
ports.
One result is that compa-
nies, especially in manufac-
turing, have slowed their hir-
ing or have stopped hiring al-
together.
Still, consumers, who
drive about 70% of U.S. econ-
omic activity, have remained
generally resilient.
In September, they mod-
estly stepped up their
spending, and their incomes
grew fast enough to let them
save more, too. A rising sav-
ing rate is encouraging be-
cause it suggests that house-
holds have leeway to keep
spending and supporting an
economic expansion that
has entered a record-break-
ing 11th year.
At the same time, busi-
nesses have been a drag on
the economy in recent
months. Collectively, they
have slashed their spending
on industrial machinery and
other equipment, mostly be-
cause the U.S.-China trade
war has made them reluc-
tant to commit to big pur-
chases. The tariffs between
the U.S. and China, the
world’s two largest econo-
mies, have also reduced U.S.
exports.
October is the usual start
of hiring for the holiday
shopping season. But the
rise of e-commerce and in-
creasing concentration of
wealth in large U.S. metros
have corresponded with the
loss of more than 20,000 jobs
at retailers over the past 12
months.
A slowdown in pay
growth is another source of
concern. Hourly average
earnings had been rising at a
3.4% annual rate back in
February, significantly
above the 3% pace in Octo-
ber.
The low unemployment
rate and a shortage of quali-
fied workers in many indus-
tries have nevertheless
failed to accelerate wages
across the job market as tra-
ditional economy theory
would suggest.

Despite strike,


job growth solid


U.S. unemployment


rate remains near a


five-decade low.


associated press

Federal food safety au-
thorities dropped a Hallow-
een surprise Thursday: 23
people in 12 states were sick-
ened by fecal bacteria traced
to romaine lettuce between
July and early September.
The Food and Drug Ad-
ministration said in its news
release that it did not publi-
cly disclose the E. coliout-
break because suspect pro-
duce was no longer available
to consumers when the U.S.
Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention determined
it was a possible culprit in
mid-September.
“The FDA and the U.S.
Centers for Disease Control
did not identify actionable
information for consumers
during this investigation.
Additionally, when romaine
lettuce was identified as the
likely source of the outbreak,
the available data at the
time indicated that the out-
break was not ongoing and
romaine lettuce eaten by
sick people was past its shelf
life and no longer available
for sale.”
Illnesses occurred be-
tween mid-July and early
September in California, Ar-
izona, Florida, Georgia, Illi-


nois, Maryland, North Car-
olina, Nevada, New York, Or-
egon, Pennsylvania and
South Carolina. No deaths
were reported, and 11 people
were hospitalized.
Neither agency returned
emails and calls Friday.
Nearly all food-borne ill-
nesses follow the same pat-
tern cited Thursday by the
agencies — in which much or
all of the affected product is
off the shelves before au-
thorities can conclusively

link it to an illness, said food-
safety litigator William Mar-
ler. That makes the FDA’s
reasoning for the delay in
disclosure seem “disingenu-
ous,” he said.
“The public has a right to
know,” Marler said. “We pay
their salaries.”
E. coli contamination
has plagued the lettuce in-
dustry in California and Ari-
zona for several years.
Last year, five people
died and more than 200 were

sickened in the worst multi-
state E. coli outbreak in a
decade. The bacteria strain
was traced to a cattle feedlot
near Yuma, Ariz. A second
outbreak that sickened
more than 50 people in mul-
tiple states was linked to ro-
maine lettuce from Califor-
nia’s Central Coast. The in-
cidents drew pledges from
the FDA to more closely
monitor produce from the
California-Arizona winter
growing regions.

Tainted romaine sickened 23


News comes months


after 12-state E. coli


outbreak because


produce was no longer


available, FDA says.


By Geoffrey Mohan


MORE THAN 20 people in 12 states, including California, fell ill after eating ro-
maine lettuce tainted by E. coli from July to early September, authorities say.

Justin SullivanGetty Images

The U.S. Supreme Court
has agreed to consider strip-
ping the Securities and Ex-
change Commission of its
power to recoup illegal prof-
its from wrongdoers, taking
up a challenge to one of the
agency’s most potent legal
weapons.
The appeal by Charles
Liu and Xin Wang contends
that “disgorgement” isn’t
one of the remedies Con-
gress has authorized the


SEC to seek against people
who violate the nation’s se-
curities fraud laws. The Cali-
fornia couple is fighting a
$27-million disgorgement or-
der.
Liu and Wang were found
to have defrauded people
seeking to take advantage of
the EB-5 visa program for
foreigners who make large
investments in the U.S. The
two were accused of falsely
telling investors the money
would be used for a cancer
treatment center. A federal
judge ordered the couple to
return $27 million they had
collected.
In total, the SEC won dis-
gorgement orders totaling
$2.5 billion in fiscal 2018,
compared with $1.4 billion in
other types of penalties.
Disgorgement is de-
signed to return ill-gotten

gains to people who were
harmed. Courts have tradi-
tionally viewed it as an “equi-
table” measure, which
means judges make awards
based on fairness rather
than strict legal rules.
The 2002 Sarbanes-Ox-
ley Act says judges hearing
SEC enforcement actions
can award “any equitable re-
lief ” they deem appropriate
for the protection of in-
vestors.
But Liu and Wang’s at-
torneys say the SEC has
sought so much money
through disgorgement that
it’s become a punitive mea-
sure, much like a penalty.
“The SEC collects huge
sums of money by pursuing a
penalty that it does not have
the power to seek in federal
court,” according to the ap-
peal.

Liu and Wang point to a
2017 Supreme Court
decision that said disgorge-
ment is covered by a five-
year statute of limitations
that applies to penalties.
That ruling explicitly de-
clined to say whether the
SEC has power to seek
disgorgement in the first
place.
The Trump administra-
tion and the SEC urged the
Supreme Court to reject the
appeal, saying Congress au-
thorized the commission to
seek disgorgement in three
separate statutes.
The administration told
the justices that the
Supreme Court “has repeat-
edly characterized disgorge-
ment as an equitable reme-
dy.”

Stohr writes for Bloomberg.

SEC disgorge power to be weighed


U.S. high court agrees


to hear a challenge by


a California couple


who are fighting a


$27-million order.


By Greg Stohr

Free download pdf