The Washington Post - 02.11.2019

(Steven Felgate) #1

A2 EZ SU THE WASHINGTON POST.SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 2 , 2019


reddest place in Iowa,” said Tam-
my Growth, a 48-year-old pastor.
“His willingness to listen to every-
one is what attracted me to listen
to him.”
Ryan Holliday, 40, who had
traveled from Galveston, Tex., was
hurt because, he said, O’Rourke
didn’t plan his campaign for years
like some candidates who outlast-
ed him.
“It’s so disappointing that he
did this before Super Tuesday,”
Holliday said. “We have all these
new voters coming out, and we
needed him to come to Texas.”
Rosia Dumey, 35, said that
O’Rourke was unfairly dismissed
by Democrats who made fun of
his Spanish speaking, blaming
the party’s focus on winning back
white voters in the Midwest.
“They just lost Texas,” said
Dumey, who had driven from the
Fort Worth area. “Do you think
we’re going to do this for other
candidates? No. We knew what
we had in Beto.”
When O’Rourke arrived, he be-
gan by thanking his supporters
“We’ll miss you!” a supporter
cried out.
“Beto! Beto! Beto!” a chant be-
gan.
O’Rourke stood in the center of
the swarm of people and spoke on
a sound system that wasn’t always
loud enough. He had made the
decision so recently and so reluc-
tantly, he said, that his wife could
not be by his side and was instead
in El Paso with their children.
He spoke of his campaign’s ad-
vocacy of action on climate
change, guns, structural racism
and immigration and pushing
back against Trump.
“I will do everything that I can
to support the eventual nominee.

... I will still be part of all of the
causes that brought us together,”
he said. “I will still be part of the
fight, and so will you.”
[email protected]
[email protected]


David Weigel contributed to this
report.

knew that the most fundamental
of them is fear — the fear that
Donald Trump wants us to feel
about one another; the very real
fear that too many in this country
live under; and the fear we some-
times feel when it comes to doing
the right thing, especially when it
runs counter to what is politically
convenient or popular.”
Trump quickly mocked
O’Rourke on Twitter as his deci-
sion became known.
“Oh no, Beto just dropped out
of race for President despite him
saying he was ‘born for this.’ I
don’t think so!” Trump wrote, in a
reference to O’Rourke’s quote in
Vanity Fair that he was “born to be
in it.”
Steve Ortega, who once served
on El Paso’s city council with
O’Rourke, said he learned that his
close friend had dropped out of
the race when reporters called
him Friday evening.
“I’m proud of him. I’m proud of
the race he ran.... Part of his
charm is what hurt him in a race
like this. He’s not testing and
polling everything he says. He
speaks from his heart.... He shot
from the hip and wasn’t running
the traditional campaign with the
canned lines,” Ortega said. He
said that while O’Rourke focused
on immigration and gun control,
voters in key states might have
wanted to hear about other is-
sues.
“I’m glad that he ran, being
from El Paso, because he brought
a needed voice to border issues
and gun control issues.”
The news of O’Rourke’s deci-
sion slowly arrived at a rally he
had planned Friday on the river-
front in Des Moines. Tickets were
still being distributed at an en-
trance, and some supporters ex-
pressed disbelief at the news, ask-
ing to be shown some proof.
Volunteers, some of whom had
awoken early to decorate a park
and line the road with signs,
hugged each other, wept and
sometimes screamed expletives.
“I saw him in Sioux Center, the

my service will not be as a candi-
date nor as the nominee of this
party for the presidency.”
The moment was a sober end to
a campaign that began with am-
ple optimism. He attracted top
political talent — Jennifer O’Mal-
ley Dillon, one of the most sought-
after Democratic consultants,
was his campaign manager — and
he had one of the field’s best
fundraising hauls on his first day
as a presidential candidate.
But what had seemed sponta-
neous and refreshing in a Senate
campaign — constantly live-
streaming activities both person-
al and political, driving his own
car and going on treks off the
beaten political path — never ful-
ly translated for presidential vot-
ers. Early social media posts —
including one in which he broad-
cast a trip to the dentist — rein-
forced an impression that he was
self-involved and lacked sub-
stance.
He made little impression dur-
ing debates. In the final debate in
which he would take part, he was
dressed down by South Bend,
Ind., Mayor Pete Buttigieg, one of
his competitors as a fresh Demo-
cratic face. A fellow Texan, former
San Antonio mayor Julián Castro,
likewise belittled him on another
debate stage. In both cases,
O’Rourke was visibly stunned.
He was also struggling to meet
the polling threshold to be part of
the next debate, and with dona-
tions drying up, aides said he
faced a decision: He could cut
staff to save money and then
spend that money on ads to lift his
standing in the polls — or he
could end the campaign.
He made the decision to drop
out on Thursday morning, ac-
cording to a campaign aide.
“I decided to run for President
because I believed that I could
help bring a divided country to-
gether in common cause to con-
front the greatest set of challeng-
es we’ve ever faced,” O’Rourke
wrote in a Medium blog post an-
nouncing his decision. “I also

O’Rourke’s departure demon-
strated the winnowing of what
began as a historically large and
diverse presidential field and now
is largely controlled by four candi-
dates, all of them white, most of
them in their 70s, and two of them
far to the left ideologically. His
decision, coupled with Biden’s
and Harris’s difficulties, leaves es-
tablishment moderates worried
about the shape of the race three
months before the Iowa caucuses.
O’Rourke, 47, was supposed to
be the sort of candidate that Dem-
ocratic voters would embrace: a
young, charismatic politician
who spoke passionately about
uniting a divided country and
embraced social media in a way
that garnered him a large follow-
ing when he unsuccessfully ran
for the U.S. Senate from Texas last
year against Sen. Ted Cruz (R). He
had lived most of his life on the
border, spoke Spanish fluently
and made reaching out to diverse
communities a cornerstone of his
campaign. The former punk rock
musician and three-term con-
gressman hated labels and often
operated on his own, indepen-
dently of the Democratic Party.
He didn’t have a pollster and said
he tried to follow his heart instead
of the crowd.
But it wasn’t always clear what
O’Rourke’s heart was telling him.
He launched his campaign with-
out a manager or a clear plan,
instead choosing to go on a listen-
ing tour of the country, starting in
Iowa, a place he had never visited.
He declared that his top issue
was combating climate change,
later shifting toward bringing
what he said was needed humani-
ty to the U.S. immigration system
and, later, fighting hate. After a
deadly shooting in his native El
Paso in August, he shifted toward
gun control.
He merged moderate positions
on some issues with stances that
even some Democrats criticized
as extreme, including a proposal
for a mandatory buyback pro-
gram for military-style weapons
that Republicans seized on to
lambaste the entire Democratic
field.
As his presidential campaign
foundered in recent months, he
was encouraged to jump into the
2020 Senate race in Texas, but he
repeatedly declined. Two people
close to him said Friday that he
would not run against Republi-
can incumbent John Cornyn,
leaving his political future un-
clear. As O’Rourke comforted
supporters in Des Moines on Fri-
day evening, he promised to con-
tinue fighting for the issues he
highlighted during his campaign.
He repeatedly insisted that he’s
optimistic about the future.
“This is a campaign that has
prided itself on seeing things
clearly and on speaking honestly,
and on acting decisively,” he told a
group of shocked supporters in
Des Moines, where he had been
scheduled to attend a multicandi-
date dinner. “We have to clearly
see at this point that we do not
have the means to pursue this
campaign successfully. And that

O’ROURKE FROM A

CORRECTION

 A caption in a photo essay
about a man reentering society
after 15 years in prison in the
Washington Post Magazine,
which was printed in advance,
incorrectly says the subject
visited Orchid Beach. It is
Orchard Beach in the Bronx.

Twitter to ban political
ads ahead of 2020

Twitter on Wednesday said it
would ban all advertisements
about political candidates,
elections and hot-button policy
issues such as abortion and
immigration, a significant shift
that comes in response to
growing concerns that
politicians are seizing on the vast
reach of social media to deceive
voters ahead of the 2020
election.
washingtonpost.com/business

Park service ends plan
to make protesters pay

The National Park Service
announced it is withdrawing a
proposal that could have made
protesters repay the federal
government for the cost of
security at demonstrations.
washingtonpost.com/local

The Washington Post is committed to
correcting errors that appear in the
newspaper. Those interested in
contacting the paper for that purpose
can:
Email: [email protected].
Call: 202-334-6000, and ask to be
connected to the desk involved —
National, Foreign, Metro, Style, Sports,
Business or any of the weekly sections.
Comments can be directed to The
Post’s reader advocate, who can be
reached at 202-334-7582 or
[email protected].

IN CASE YOU MISSED IT

Some reports that you may have missed. Read more at washingtonpost.com.

Calif. Rep. Katie Hill


quits over ethics probe


Rep. Katie Hill announced her
resignation from Congress amid
an ethics inquiry into allegations
that she had an intimate
relationship with a staff member
in her office. Hill, 32, who flipped
a Republican-held seat in a
district northeast of Los Angeles,
was seen as a rising star in the
Democratic Party.
washingtonpost.com/national


London Fire Brigade


faulted in tower blaze


Fewer people would have died
in the deadly Grenfell Tower fire
on June 14, 2017, if the London
Fire Brigade had evacuated the
burning building sooner, a public
inquiry found. The fire at the 24-
story public housing complex
killed 72 people.
washingtonpost.com/world


KLMNO


NEWSPAPER DELIVERY
For home delivery comments
or concerns contact us at
washingtonpost.com/subscriberservices or
send us an email at
[email protected] or call
202-334-6100 or 800-477-


TO SUBSCRIBE
800-753-POST (7678)


TO ADVERTISE
washingtonpost.com/mediakit
Classified: 202-334-
Display: 202-334-


MAIN PHONE NUMBER
202-334-


TO REACH THE NEWSROOM
Metro: 202-334-7300;
[email protected]
National: 202-334-7410;
[email protected]
Business: 202-334-7320;
[email protected]
Sports: 202-334-7350;
[email protected]
Reader Advocate: 202-334-7582;
[email protected]


TO REACH THE OPINION PAGES
Letters to the editor:
[email protected] or call
202-334-
Opinion:
[email protected]
Published daily (ISSN 0190-8286).
POSTMASTER: Send address changes to
The Washington Post, 1301 K St. NW, Washington,
D.C. 20071.
Periodicals postage paid in Washington, D.C., and
additional mailing office.


BY CHRIS MOONEY

Rising seas will be much worse
and more expensive to deal with
than previously thought, new re-
search finds, not because of faster
changes in sea levels but because of
an increase in estimates of the
number of people living on low
ground.
The upshot of the study is that
110 million people worldwide live
below the high-tide level; that in-
cludes many partly protected by
sea walls or other infrastructure, as
in New Orleans. Even under a sce-
nario of very modest climate
change, that number will rise to
150 million in 2050 and 190 million
by 2100.
If climate change and sea level
rise follow a worse path, as many as
340 million people living below the
high-tide level could be in peril, to
say nothing of how many could be
affected by floods and extreme
events.
Such figures are three times — or
more — higher than earlier esti-
mates.
“We’ve had a huge blind spot as
to the degree of danger, and that’s
what we’ve been striving to im-
prove,” said Benjamin Strauss of
Climate Central, who wrote the
new study in Nature Communica-


tions with colleague Scott Kulp.
The reason for the big change is
that prior research has relied on
data about coastal elevations that
comes from radar measurements
from the 2000 space shuttle En-
deavor mission. But that data set
has problems. The instrument de-
tected the height not only of the
coastal land surface but anything
else that was on it, such as houses
and trees. This introduced errors in
land-elevation estimates averaging
about 6½ feet globally, the new
study says.
“For all of the resources we have
rightly invested in improving our
sea level projections, we didn’t
know the height of the ground be-
neath our feet,” Strauss said.
Some wealthy countries, such as
the United States, have used laser-
based coastal measurements to
gain more accuracy, but most have
not been able to do so.
The new study uses the more
accurate U.S. measurements as a
guide, training an algorithm to ap-
ply similar adjustments to the glob-
al data set from the space shuttle.
This is where the much higher
numbers for exposed populations
come from, with the biggest chang-
es in exposure coming for countries
in Asia.
“In terms of global estimates, I

think the analysis convincingly
shows that the situation is prob-
ably even worse than previous
studies suggested,” said Stéphane
Hallegatte, an economist at the
World Bank who studies climate
change and disaster exposure. “We
are talking about hundreds of mil-
lions of people who will be directly
exposed.”
The changes are certainly very
large. The study estimates that 110
million people live below the cur-
rent high-tide level vs. an estimated
28 million for the older data set.
About 250 million people would
fall below the level of the worst
yearly flood, the study says, up from
the previous estimate of 65 million.
Projections illustrate how ex-
posed people will be as seas contin-
ue to rise.
The study considers a scenario
that would lead to 2 degrees Cel-
sius, or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, of
global warming by 2100, the tem-
perature rise that world leaders
have set as an absolute limit. The
study projects that 150 million peo-
ple would live below the high tide
line by 2050 and 200 million by


  1. Those exposed to an annual
    flood in that year would be 360 mil-
    lion.
    The world is on course to warm
    considerably more than 2 degrees


Celsius, however, so there are more
dire scenarios.
If key instabilities kick in in Ant-
arctica, 480 million people would
be exposed to an annual flood in
2100.
The findings are worst for Asia,
notably in China, Bangladesh and
India. In the worst-case scenario,
87 million, 50 million and 38 mil-
lion people in those countries, re-
spectively, would fall below the
high-tide level in 2100.
The situation is, if anything,
more ominous than these figures
suggest, according to the World
Bank’s Hallegatte. That’s because
in addition to high-tide and annual
worst-case flood events, there are
major floods from hurricanes and
other storms and disasters to con-
sider, even if they do not occur
every year. The impact of these
severe events will be worsened and
affect larger populations as seas
continue to rise.
“Most dikes and protection sys-
tems have been built for the sea
level of 50 years ago or more, and
will be increasingly ill-designed to
protect people against floods, lead-
ing to rapidly increasing coastal
flood losses in the absence of large
upgrades,” Hallegatte said. “Up-
grading those systems will be ex-
pensive but is unavoidable if one

wants to avoid unacceptable eco-
nomic losses in large cities.”
Several other researchers said
the new estimates are a step for-
ward, although some criticized the
work.
“This study is an important step
toward a more accurate estimation
of population at risk from global
sea level rise,” said Pinki Mondal, a
University of Delaware researcher
who uses satellite and other re-
mote-sensing tools to study climate
change risks and effects. “With ad-
vancements in technology, com-
puting resources and machine
learning, it is becoming increasing-
ly possible to have highly accurate
estimates of say, elevation, as
shown in this study.”
Athanasios Vafeidis, a sea level
expert at the University of Kiel in
Germany, agreed that the research
presents “new, improved informa-
tion on coastal elevation.”
“However,” he said, “important
factors such as socioeconomic de-
velopment and adaptation are not
considered in these estimates.
Physical processes are represented
in a rather simplistic manner.”
Vafeidis noted that it’s not clear
how well the algorithm, which is
trained on the U.S. coastline, per-
forms in other countries. He also
said that the way populations grow

and adapt to rising seas is more
complex than the study was able to
account for and that the effects of
floods, too, depend on much more
nuanced factors than the sheer ele-
vation of the land.
Climate Central’s Strauss ac-
knowledges that the study does not
give any “explicit consideration” to
current adaptation measures, such
as sea walls, in assessing present-
day exposure; it is merely measur-
ing the elevation of the land itself
and the number of people living on
it.
That, he argues, may be good
news — an indication that humans
are already capable of adapting to
threats from the sea.
“We infer that there must be
coastal defenses protecting those
100 million-plus people below to-
day’s high tide line,” Strauss said.
“Because only a handful of them
can be living in houseboats or
homes on stilts.”
Still, whatever their current de-
fenses, people already living below
high-tide lines are likely to be in-
creasingly tested in coming years.
“This new study suggests that a
lot of the assessments published on
climate change risks are underesti-
mated and would need to be re-
vised,” Hallegatte said.
[email protected]

Study: Rising seas threaten 3 times as many people as previously thought


Lacking funds, traction with public, O’Rourke ends run


SALWAN GEORGES/THE WASHINGTON POST
Beto O’Rourke, seen in Alexandria in 2018, is the highest-profile aspirant to drop out of the 2020 race.

Home delivery starts your day off right. 1-800-753-POST washingtonpost.com/subscribe


SF


  • Upholstery • Shutters • Slipcovers

  • Curtains • Cornices • Swags

  • Roman Shades • Custom Bedding


FREE SHOP AT HOME 1.800.666.
Fairfax 703.425.4887 • N. Bethesda 301.881.
Annapolis 410.224.2360 • DC 202.537.
http://www.millendshops.net • Mill End Shops • @millend_shops

CUSTOM


50 % Off!
Call for details

Up
To

Fa l l Sa le!
Custom tailored furniture and window treatments
Free download pdf