C2 LATIMES.COM/BUSINESS
BUSINESS BEAT
A coalition that includes
Netflix Inc., HBO and cable
industry titans is stepping
up efforts to crack down on
password sharing, dis-
cussing new measures to
close a loophole that could
be costing companies bil-
lions of dollars in revenue
each year.
Programmers and cable
TV distributors are consid-
ering an array of tactics to
cut off people who borrow
credentials from friends and
relatives to watch program-
ming without paying for it.
The possible measures in-
clude requiring customers
to change their passwords
periodically or texting codes
to subscribers’ phones that
they would need to enter to
keep watching, according to
people familiar with the
matter.
Some TV executives
want to create rules govern-
ing which devices can be
used to access a cable TV
subscription outside the
home.
While someone logging in
from a phone or tablet would
be fine, someone using a
Roku device at a second lo-
cation could be considered a
likely freeloader, one person
said.
If none of those tactics
works, pay-TV subscribers
could someday be required
to sign in to their accounts
using their thumbprints.
“I feel like I’m beating my
head against the wall,” Tom
Rutledge, chief executive of
Charter Communications
Inc., said during an earnings
call last month. “It’s just too
easy to get the product with-
out paying for it.”
But taking more aggres-
sive measures poses risks.
The people using services
for free — especially younger
ones — may never agree to
sign up for a subscription, no
matter how many hassles
they endure.
That means companies
would mostly just be alienat-
ing paying customers, who
could get frustrated and
stop using an app or cancel
their service. In other words,
there’s plenty of downside
and possibly little upside.
“If you ask any cohort of
young people if they will ever
pay for Netflix or video serv-
ices, the answer is unequivo-
cally no,” said Mike McCor-
mack, an analyst at Guggen-
heim Securities.
The pay-TV industry is
projected to lose $6.6 billion
in revenue from password
sharing and piracy this year,
according to Parks Associ-
ates. By 2024, the number
could grow to $9 billion, the
research firm said.
Two years ago, some of
the biggest names in enter-
tainment and technology
formed a group called the Al-
liance for Creativity and En-
tertainment, which was de-
voted to reducing online pi-
racy. Last month, the group
announced that it’s turning
its attention to password
sharing. Participants in-
clude Netflix, Amazon.com
Inc., Walt Disney Co., Via-
com Inc., AT&T Inc.’s HBO,
Comcast Corp. and Charter.
There’s no consensus on
where to draw the line.
People can access
streaming programming
both from distributors such
as Charter and from
programmers such as Fox
via their mobile apps. There-
fore, the two sides of the in-
dustry need to work to-
gether to thwart password
sharers. Charter, which sells
cable TV service under the
Spectrum brand, has said its
recent distribution deals
with Fox and Disney will
help them address password
sharing, but didn’t specify
what measures they’d take.
Although industry exe-
cutives widely agree that
password sharing is a prob-
lem, there’s no consensus on
where to draw the line.
Programmers and distribu-
tors blame each other for be-
ing too lenient in how many
people can simultaneously
stream from one account.
DirecTV and Comcast allow
five streams. Fox and ESPN
generally allow three.
Online TV services also
vary in how generous they
are about password sharing.
Apple TV+, which launched
Nov. 1, allows up to six people
to stream from one family
plan.
Two upcoming services
— AT&T’s HBO Max and
NBCUniversal’s Peacock —
aren’t ready to announce
how many streams they will
allow, according to company
representatives. A spokes-
woman for Disney+, which
launches Tuesday, didn’t re-
spond to a request for com-
ment.
Netflix allows just one
stream for its basic plan and
four streams for its most ex-
pensive service.
Three years ago, CEO
Reed Hastings said pass-
word sharing was “some-
thing you have to learn to live
with, because there’s so
much legitimate password
sharing — like you sharing
with your spouse, with your
kids.”
Recently, there have been
indications that the com-
pany may be reconsidering
its tolerance.
On an earnings call last
month, Chief Product Offi-
cer Greg Peters said Netflix
was “looking at the situa-
tion” and seeking “con-
sumer-friendly ways to push
on the edges of that.”
Smith writes for Bloomberg.
Drawing the line on password sharing
Netflix, cable giants
and HBO study ways
to cut off people who
borrow access and
watch shows for free.
By Gerry Smith
NETFLIX CEOReed Hastings at CES 2016. Password sharing and piracy may cost the pay-TV industry $6.6 billion in revenue this year.
Robyn BeckAFP via Getty Images
Facing a federal lawsuit
and mounting criticism, Ed-
ucation Secretary Betsy De-
Vos said Friday she would
forgive loans for more than
1,500 borrowers who at-
tended a pair of for-profit
colleges that shut down last
year.
Students who attended
the Art Institute of Colorado
and the Illinois Institute of
Art from Jan. 20, 2018,
through the end of last year
will have their federal stu-
dent loans canceled, DeVos
said, and students who at-
tended 24 other schools
owned by the same company
can get their loans erased if
they enrolled after June 29,
2 018.
The decision involves
schools owned by the Dream
Center company, which col-
lapsed last year and closed
campuses across the nation,
following several other ma-
jor for-profit college op-
erators that have failed in re-
cent years.
DeVos has faced mount-
ing criticism over her han-
dling of federal loan forgiv-
eness programs. The pro-
grams were expanded by the
Obama administration after
the collapse of Corinthian
Colleges, which was accused
of lying to students to get
them to enroll.
Under DeVos, the Educa-
tion Department has
stopped processing claims
from students who say
they’ve been defrauded by
their schools, leaving tens of
thousands of borrowers in
limbo as they seek loan can-
cellations. DeVos has also
moved to tighten eligibility
rules, prompting backlash
from Democrats and a flurry
of lawsuits from students
and advocacy groups.
In the latest case, a fed-
eral lawsuit against the Edu-
cation Department said the
department illegally re-
leased federal student aid to
the Colorado and Illinois
schools even after the
schools lost their accred-
itor’s seal of approval. Los-
ing approval should have
made the schools ineligible
for funding, the suit says, but
instead they were allowed to
keep operating without
telling students that the in-
stitutions were in trouble.
But Friday, the depart-
ment shifted blame to the
accrediting group, the
Higher Learning Commis-
sion, saying it assigned the
schools a “newly developed
and improperly defined ac-
creditation status.” The de-
partment said it believed the
schools should not have lost
their accreditation and that,
by revoking it, the accreditor
left students with tarnished
credits that might not be ac-
cepted by other schools.
“The department is com-
mitted to holding institu-
tions and accreditors ac-
countable to the students
they serve,” DeVos said in a
statement. “In this instance,
students were failed and de-
serve to be made whole.”
The Higher Learning
Commission did not directly
respond to DeVos’ allega-
tions but applauded her de-
cision to provide relief.
“HLC’s policy requires in-
stitutions to promptly in-
form their students and
other stakeholders regard-
ing any change to their ac-
creditation status,” the
group said. “In this instance,
the institutions did not ap-
propriately inform their stu-
dents as was required and
specifically instructed by
HLC.”
Students of former
Dream Center schools sued
DeVos on Oct. 22, demand-
ing loan forgiveness and
other measures that DeVos
largely agreed to. Student
Defense, a Washington ad-
vocacy group that helped file
the suit, celebrated the news
as a victory.
“At long last, the depart-
ment is taking action to can-
cel the illegal debt that it is-
sued for students who were
ripped off by the Dream Cen-
ter,” said Eric Rothschild,
the group’s litigation direc-
tor.
Facing a lawsuit,
DeVos will erase
student loans
associated press
Google’s moves to cram
the top of its search results
with more and more adver-
tising are hammering the
online travel industry, one of
the internet giant’s biggest
customers.
Expedia Group Inc. and
TripAdvisor Inc. reported
dismal third-quarter results
this week and laid the blame
on Google. Their stocks
dropped, as did shares of
Booking Holdings Inc.,
whose brands include Kay-
ak, Priceline and Booking-
.com. That wiped out a com-
bined market value of more
than $13 billion from the
three online travel agents
Thursday. The stocks re-
gained only a little bit of that
ground Friday.
Google dominates the
online search market, hold-
ing at least three-quarters of
it. People use the search en-
gine to research trips, so for
at least a decade online trav-
el agents have refined their
websites with trustworthy
content and easy booking
tools to show up high in
Google results.
This search engine opti-
mization, or SEO, worked
well until about five years
ago. Around that time,
Google began placing more
ads at the top of search re-
sults, pushing down the free
listings. Google also built
new travel search tools,
which were mostly paid list-
ings too. This means online
travel agents now must pay
billions of dollars each year
to Google to ensure they
show up high in search re-
sults and get clicks from
travel planners.
The online travel indus-
try has been concerned
about Google’s changes
since at least 2016. But the
full effect was felt this week.
“Google has got more ag-
gressive,” TripAdvisor Chief
Executive Stephen Kaufer
said during a conference call
with analysts late Wednes-
day. “We’re not predicting
that it’s going to turn
around.”
Free traffic is “shrinking
all the time,” Expedia CEO
Mark Okerstrom said the
same day. “Google does con-
tinue to push for more reve-
nue per visitor. And I think
it’s just the reality of where
the world is.”
The industry has been
trying other marketing
channels, such as social me-
dia and more TV advertis-
ing. But Google’s search en-
gine is so pervasive that on-
line travel agents have to
keep buying ads from the
company to keep traffic
coming to their sites.
D.A. Davidson analysts
wrote that Expedia is ex-
ploring alternatives to miti-
gate its “reliance on search/
Google,” but they see “no al-
ternatives that will be able to
efficiently ‘move the needle’
from a volume perspective
anytime soon.”
Declines in the online
travel industry come as an-
titrust scrutiny of Google is
ramping up in the United
States. State, federal and
congressional investiga-
tions are underway to deter-
mine whether the company
violates competition law.
One area of concern is
vertical search, which en-
tails Google using its main
search engine to promote
its own industry-specific
products over those of other
companies. Travel is one ex-
ample where this is happen-
ing, along with local search,
contractor marketplaces
such as Angie’s List and
shopping-comparison serv-
ices.
Google has been a rising
risk for the travel industry
for a while, but executives
generally have hesitated to
blame it for poor results. The
search giant is one of the
most important sources of
traffic and business for on-
line travel agencies, so they
have tried to maintain a
good relationship.
But this quarter,
Google’s effect was so
painful, industry executives
and Wall Street analysts
couldn’t avoid it.
“We see these Google
changes as a potential head-
wind to [online travel agen-
cies’] profitability,” Morgan
Stanley analyst Brian
Nowak said in a note to cli-
ents. People who want to in-
vest in the online travel sec-
tor should do it through
Google stock, he added.
Booking Holdings, the
largest online travel agent,
was peppered with ques-
tions about Google during a
conference call with analysts
Thursday.
CEO Glenn Fogel said
Booking Holdings’ future
success will rely on reaching
people without Google get-
ting in the way.
“What we know is most
important is for us to get
customers to come to us di-
rectly,” he said, adding that
building brand strength and
retaining customers better
means the company “will
not be as dependent on
other sources of traffic.”
Travel sites squeezed by Google
Expedia and other
online agents say
search engine changes
are to blame for a
dismal third quarter.
bloomberg
TRAVELsites pay billions a year to Google to ensure their place in search results.
“Google has got more aggressive,” TripAdvisor CEO Stephen Kaufer told analysts.
Horacio VillalobosCorbis