THE WALL STREET JOURNAL. Friday, November 8, 2019 |A
Central Bank Sees
Modest Growth
LONDON—The Bank of Eng-
land said it expects the U.K.
economy to pick up modestly
over the next three years if
lawmakers back Prime Minister
Boris Johnson’s Brexit deal and
the country pursues a free-
trade accord with the European
Union.
The forecasts—published
Thursday after the central
bank’s monetary policy meet-
ing—mark the first time the
central bank has assessed Mr.
Johnson’s Brexit plan. While it
said the deal would create new
barriers to trade with a bloc
that currently buys around half
of U.K. exports, it added that
the removal of uncertainty
could boost investment, which
has stalled since mid-2016.
“The picture in the U.K.
could change, with the recent
U.K.-EU Withdrawal Agreement
creating the prospects for a
pickup in U.K. growth,” BOE
Gov. Mark Carney told report-
ers.
However, rate setters said
they are prepared to cut their
key interest rate if that antici-
pated boost to growth doesn’t
materialize. Mr. Carney said the
exact details of the new trade
agreement may take years to
work out, and businesses and
households may continue to
feel they lack the clarity on the
final terms that would spur
higher spending. At this week’s
meeting, two on the nine-mem-
ber body that sets rates voted
to make that cut now.
The projections come ahead
of a nationwide election on
Dec. 12, when Mr. Johnson is
hoping to secure a majority in
Parliament to ratify a Brexit
deal agreed last month with
Brussels.
—Jason Douglas
The senior U.S. diplomat for
northeast Syria asserted in an
internal memo that the Trump
administration didn’t try hard
enough to dissuade Turkey
from intervening militarily in
northeast Syria, a person fa-
miliar with the assessment
said.
The memo was written by
William Roebuck, a veteran
diplomat who previously
served as the U.S. ambassador
to Bahrain, and was sent Oct.
31 to James Jeffrey, the U.S.
special envoy on Syria issues,
as well as to Pentagon, State
Department and White House
officials.
In a lengthy analysis, Mr.
Roebuck acknowledged that a
more forceful policy of threat-
ening economic sanctions
against Ankara and a stepped-
up military presence might
not have deterred Turkish
President Recep Tayyip Erdo-
gan from ordering a military
intervention in Syria.
“It’s a tough call, and the
answer is probably not,” Mr.
Roebuck wrote in the unclassi-
fied memo, the person said.
“But we won’t know because
we didn’t try.”
He also said that Turkish-
backed Arab fighters that were
used in the intervention have
carried out “war crimes and
ethnic cleansing.”
The memo comes to light as
Mr. Erdogan is planning to
meet with President Trump on
Wednesday at the White
House. The memo was earlier
reported on by the New York
Times.
The State Department de-
clined to comment on Mr. Roe-
buck’s assessment. “We will
not confirm or deny alleged
private internal communica-
tions,” said Morgan Ortagus,
the State Department spokes-
woman. “That said, we have
made clear that we strongly
disagreed with President Er-
dogan’s decision to enter Syria
and that we did everything
short of a military confronta-
tion to stop it.”
Turkey’s intervention in
Syria was preceded by an Oct.
6 phone call between Messrs.
However, the divisions over
Brexit have made it harder for
Britain’s two big parties to win
a majority as voters switch to
smaller parties that either
want to leave the European
Union abruptly or not leave at
all.
The Conservatives and La-
bour Party are polling 37% and
26% respectively, according to
recent polling, leaving space
for smaller parties to en-
croach.
“We basically have a system
that is built for two parties
but polling now shows that we
are very far from two-party
politics,” says Chris Curtis, a
political researcher at YouGov,
a pollster.
Some of those smaller par-
ties have agreed not to run in
certain districts to maximize
the chances for anti-Brexit
lawmakers.
“This is the last-chance sa-
loon on Brexit,” said Heidi Al-
len, a former lawmaker who
voting system usually leads to
an underrepresentation of
smaller parties in Parliament.
In recent decades, parties with
the support of fewer than 40%
of voters have won a majority
and formed a government.
tered into a large-scale deal
was in 1918 with the “coupon
election”—where candidates
were endorsed who had sup-
ported the coalition govern-
ment during World War I.
Britain’s first-past-the-post
tive Party to enter into an alli-
ance with his Brexit Party, an
offer that Prime Minister Boris
Johnson has turned down.
Such pre-election pacts are
rare in British politics. The
last time that two parties en-
now chairs an anti-Brexit
group called Unite to Remain,
which helped organize the 60-
seat pact. The group believes
that 44 of those seats can be
won by pro-EU candidates
with such an a deal in place.
Under the pact, local candi-
dates will withdraw from the
race depending on which of
the three parties has the best
chance of winning. The Liberal
Democrats say they will cancel
Brexit if they win the election.
The Green Party want to cam-
paign to stay in the EU in an-
other referendum on the mat-
ter.
Still, it is far from certain
these agreements will have a
meaningful effect. The number
of seats targeted is small and
Labour is refusing to enter
into pacts with smaller enti-
ties.
On the other side, Mr. John-
son has so far ruled out doing
a deal with Mr. Farage.
The Brexit Party leader is
pressuring the prime minister
to scrap the divorce deal he
negotiated with the EU and
abruptly leave the trading
bloc. Mr. Johnson said on
Wednesday that Mr. Farage’s
party “remind me a bit of can-
dle-sellers at the dawn of the
age of the electric lightbulb.”
As things stand, polls show
that Mr. Johnson has enough
support to win despite the
Brexit Party standing in many
seats across the country. How-
ever, if the Brexit Party gains
traction, it could take votes
and seats away from the Con-
servatives, even if it wins no
seats of its own.
Pollsters point to a by-elec-
tion in Brecon and Radnor-
shire in rural Wales this year
as a cautionary tale of what
could befall the Conservatives.
Smaller parties pulled out to
endorse the Liberal Democrat
candidate and the Brexit Party
siphoned off thousands of
Conservative voters. The re-
sult: the Conservatives lost a
district that had previously
voted to quit the EU.
WORLD NEWS
LONDON—As Brexit contin-
ues to reshape British politics,
the country’s smaller political
parties are breaking with prec-
edent and pushing for pre-
election nonaggression pacts
in an effort to maximize their
impact on next month’s gen-
eral election.
With Britain’s two-party
system crumbling as voters
abandon traditional party alle-
giances to vote along Brexit
lines, a clutch of parties are in
contention to receive millions
of votes. Ahead of the Dec. 12
poll, several of these political
groups are maneuvering as
they try to maximize the
chances of pro- or anti-Brexit
candidates winning key dis-
tricts.
On Thursday, a group of
anti-Brexit parties—the Liberal
Democrats, the Green Party
and Plaid Cymru, the Welsh
nationalist party—said they
would field only one candidate
between them in 60 seats in
the 650-seat Parliament. A
similar deal was struck this
week in Northern Ireland to
try to stop the pro-Brexit
Democratic Unionist
Party winning in six districts.
The deal is a way to address
a problem for anti-Brexit cam-
paigners: there are too many
parties wooing voters who
want to stay in the EU. That
risks splitting the anti-Brexit
vote and gifting victory to the
Conservatives. Labour has also
promised a second referendum
over whether voters want to
leave under a new agreement
that it has promised to negoti-
ate or remain in the EU.
Meanwhile, on the other
side of the Brexit divide, euro-
skeptic politician Nigel Farage
is urging the ruling Conserva-
BYMAXCOLCHESTER
Small U.K. Parties Seek Pacts on Election
Pre-vote deals are
meant to maximize
their influence on
Brexit’s outcome
Liberal Democrat Leader Jo Swinson, left, working on her campaign bus Thursday, agreed with two other parties to coordinate candidates.
AARON CHOWN/PA WIRE/ASSOCIATED PRESS
Trump and Erdogan in which
the Turkish leader expressed
impatience with American ef-
forts to work with Ankara to
set up a safe zone to ensure
that Kurdish fighters couldn’t
threaten Turkey.
After the call, Mr. Trump
ordered the withdrawal of
about 50 U.S. troops from two
outposts near Syria’s border
with Turkey, and later directed
the departure of the approxi-
mately 1,000 troops from the
northeast part of the country.
U.S. lawmakers complained
that Mr. Trump effectively
gave Turkey a green light to
intervene militarily, creating a
vacuum that Russian and Syr-
ian forces would move to fill,
diminishing American influ-
ence in the Middle East. Ad-
ministration officials have said
that Mr. Trump acted pru-
dently to remove American
troops from a volatile situa-
tion.
As criticism of Mr. Trump’s
withdrawal decision mounted,
including from Republican
lawmakers, Mr. Trump di-
rected that some U.S. forces be
sent to protect an oil field in
northeast Syria.
Mr. Roebuck noted in his
memo that this policy switch
would mitigate some of the
consequences of Mr. Trump’s
initial withdrawal decision.
The Kurdish-led Syrian Demo-
cratic Forces would have some
territory to use and American
forces could continue to work
with them in confronting Is-
lamic State militants.
But Mr. Trump’s assertions
that the U.S. “keep the oil”
and perhaps bring in large
American companies to de-
velop it raised another prob-
lem. Mr. Roebuck cautioned
that statements about protect-
ing the oil would reinforce
suspicious in the region that
Washington was secretly plot-
ting to take over the Middle
East’s resources. The diplomat
advised that the Trump ad-
ministration instead stress
that the oil belongs to the Syr-
ian people.
On Thursday, a Pentagon
spokesman signaled a change
in the administration’s mes-
sage on Syria’s oil. “The reve-
nue from this is not going to
the U.S., this is going to the
SDF,” Pentagon spokesman
Jonathan Hoffman said.
Mr. Roebuck, who didn’t re-
spond to a request to com-
ment, has spent more than
two decades working on Mid-
dle East issues for the State
Department and has been
based in Syria, Iraq, Libya, Is-
rael and Bahrain.
He now serves as special
adviser to Mr. Jeffrey and has
spent much of his time as the
top diplomat—and in recent
weeks, the only—on the
ground in northeast Syria.
BYMICHAELR.GORDON
American Diplomat Faults U.S. on Turkish Intervention
William Roebuck, a State Department adviser in northern Syria,
greeted a Syrian Democratic Forces commander in March.
CHRIS MCGRATH/GETTY IMAGES
that the inspector had been
stopped from entering the Na-
tanz nuclear facility after an
alarm went off at the entrance,
which includes equipment to
detect traces of nitrate explo-
sives. He said the procedure
was repeated several times
and the alarm went off again.
The incident is the first
flare-up between Iran and the
IAEA, which monitors Iran’s
compliance with the 2015 nu-
clear deal, since it was imple-
mented in January 2016.
Before the nuclear deal,
Iran repeatedly denied IAEA
inspectors access to sites and
accused the agency of sending
in spies.
The friction comes after
Iran announced fresh steps
Tuesday to step away from the
accord’s limits in response to
harsh U.S. sanctions. Those ac-
tions and the new concerns
raised by the IAEA about Iran’s
behavior are increasing calls
from the U.S. and Israel to
tighten pressure on Iran.
Iran “is positioning itself
for a rapid nuclear breakout,”
Secretary of State Mike
Pompeo said on Twitter Thurs-
day following Iran’s announce-
ment this week that it was re-
suming enriching uranium at
its underground nuclear plant
at Fordow, near Iran’s holy city
of Qom. “It is now time for all
nations to reject its nuclear
extortion and increase pres-
sure.”
The IAEA called the deten-
tion of the inspector unaccept-
able and said it disagreed with
Iran’s characterization of the
incident.
The agency said it ordered
the inspector to leave the
country after she was blocked
from entering Natanz. The in-
spector has now returned
home, according to U.S. offi-
cials.
The agency reported on the
incident involving the inspec-
tor at a meeting of its board
Thursday, where the IAEA also
put pressure on Iran over the
presence of undeclared nuclear
material at Turquz Abad, a
now-dismantled site in Tehran.
Iran says its nuclear pro-
gram is for peaceful civilian
process. It has said it is com-
plying with the IAEA’s probe.
—Felicia Schwartz
in Jerusalem
contributed to this article.
The U.S. accused Iran of in-
timidating nuclear inspectors
after a woman from the United
Nations atomic agency was
blocked from entering the
country’s main enrichment site
and briefly stopped from leav-
ing the country.
Western diplomats said on
Thursday that the inspector
had been held by Iranian au-
thorities last week and her pa-
pers confiscated after she had
been prevented from entering
Iran’s enrichment facility at
Natanz, some 180 miles south
of Tehran.
The U.S. ambassador to the
International Atomic Energy
Agency, Jackie Wolcott, called
the move an “outrageous prov-
ocation” and harassment of
the agency’s monitoring work.
Iran’s ambassador to the
IAEA Kazem Gharib Abadi said
BYLAURENCENORMAN
U.S. Accuses Iran of Menacing U.N. Inspectors
Western diplomats
say an inspector was
held by Iranian
authorities last week.