from skulking away. When close
enough to the enemy position, infantry
would charge with bayonets fixed,
either putting the defenders to flight or
engaging in hand-to-hand combat,
often grasping their muskets by the
barrel and wielding them like clubs.
Although Civil War operations
sometimes approximated this ideal of
an infantry attack, mostly they did not.
Terrain was against it. European tactics
were designed for fighting on open
ground; in the swamps and forests of
the American wilderness a looser style
Developments in military technology under
way at the time of the Civil War would
make offensive infantry tactics even more
problematic over the next 50 years.
REPEATING RIFLES
The infantry weapons that would make the rifle
musket obsolete were breech-loading
rapid-fire guns using metal cartridges.
Repeater rifles, especially the Spencer rifle, were
used quite widely in the Union army by the end
of the war. The Spencer could fire 20 rounds
a minute, compared with the maximum three
rounds of a muzzle-loader. The Gatling gun,
used experimentally in the Civil War, was
capable of firing 200 rounds a minute and
heralded the era of automatic weapons.
TRENCH WARFARE
In the decades after the Civil War, artillery
also became dramatically more efficient
in range, rate of fire, and the explosive power
of shells. Along with the use of barbed wire
to protect entrenchments, these weapons
developments led to the trench warfare of World
War I, where the same fundamental infantry
tactics were employed, with even higher
casualty rates for even less result.
designed to discourage them from
halting to return fire. By advancing
swiftly and relentlessly, the columns
were expected to smash a hole in
Confederate defensive positions, and on
occasion they succeeded. But as field
fortifications became more elaborate,
protected by abbatis (barricades made
from trees piled on top of each other),
successful frontal infantry assaults
became almost impossible.
The value of maneuverability
The answer to the stalemate imposed by
the superiority of defensive firepower
was maneuver. By marching around
the flank or to the rear of enemy
defenses, troops could attack from an
unexpected quarter or force an enemy
withdrawal. Well-drilled troops, capable
of swift marching maneuvers, were
responsible for some striking victories.
Yet even such a master of maneuver as
General Robert E. Lee could find no
alternative to launching “Pickett’s
Charge,” the notorious frontal assault at
Gettysburg in 1863. The trench warfare
of the late Civil War made frontal
assaults deadly, and deprived both sides
of the freedom to maneuver. The Civil
War thus drifted into a tactical
stalemate decided by attrition.
AFTER
Standard issue rifle musket
The 1861 Springfield percussion rifle musket was the
standard infantry weapon throughout the war. It had a
40-in (101.6-cm) barrel, weighed 9lb (4kg), and its
range and accuracy made it popular with the troops.
FIGHTING ON FOOT
of fighting was inevitable. Troops
were often inadequately disciplined,
especially early in the war. The more
likely sequence of events in an
encounter was that one side would
advance and fire, the other side would
rush forward from their defensive
position to fire, and a general melee
ensued. But above all, the traditional
European method of infantry attack
was in crisis because improvements in
artillery and the adoption of the rifle
musket had tipped the balance
decisively against the attacker.
Defensive superiority
Men advancing in line shoulder-to-
shoulder were hopelessly vulnerable
to infantry volleys and cannon firing
canister and grapeshot. A straightforward
method for reducing casualties was the
adoption of a looser formation, with
men spread out as in a skirmish line.
In contrast, defenders were almost
invulnerable until overrun, especially
if they had dug rifle pits or found a
wall or bank to shelter behind.
Soldiers found their own ways to
preserve their lives, exploiting cover,
firing in a kneeling or prone position,
and reloading lying on their backs.
Experienced troops learned to lie low
when fire was intense, then advance in
short rushes when defensive volleys
faltered, with colleagues covering the
move with suppressive fire. The
disadvantage of this method was that
once troops had “gone to ground,” they
were likely to stay there if the defensive
fire remained hot, especially if they
judged success unlikely.
In 1864, in an effort to restore the
momentum of frontal assault, Union
troops were driven forward in tight
columns, with no percussion caps
pre-placed in their guns—a measure
Bayonet charge
This Winslow Homer illustration shows an attack on an
enemy line early in the war. On the left in the background,
infantrymen advance in orderly ranks; in the foreground a
bayonet charge develops into hand-to-hand fighting.
Union trenches at Vicksburg
During sieges, troops dug elaborate trench systems that
discouraged attack. Although earthworks were rarely as
salubrious as those shown here, once in a trench a
soldier was often reluctant to leave it.
The factor by which firepower was
improved when flintlock muskets
were replaced by rifle muskets,
increasing both the effective firing
range of Civil War infantry and the
rate of fire.
5
“I have seen pictures of battles—
they would all be in line,
standing in a nice level field
fighting ... but it isn’t so.”
UNION PRIVATE WILLIAM BREARLEY, LETTER FROM ANTIETAM, SEPTEMBER 1862