New Scientist - 19.10.2019

(WallPaper) #1
19 October 2019 | New Scientist | 7

TWO years after missing out
on a 2-hour marathon by only
25 seconds, Eliud Kipchoge
has become the first person
ever to run 42.2 kilometres in
less than 2 hours.
He ended the run in Vienna,
Austria, on 12 October, smiling
and pointing to the crowd as he
accelerated through the final
kilometre to finish in 1:59:40.
The feat won’t be recognised as
an official world marathon record
because it wasn’t a race and the
elite athlete was assisted by a
pace car and a rotating team of
41 pacemakers.
Nevertheless, Kipchoge’s
achievement is undoubtedly
historic. And the following day,
Brigid Kosgei set a women’s

world marathon record of 2:14:
in the Chicago Marathon.
These feats show how far sports
science has come. “Many of the
leading scientists didn’t really
see [a sub-2-hour marathon]
happening in the next couple
of years,” says Stephen Mears at
Loughborough University, UK.
The marathon record was just
under 3 hours at the start of the
20th century, but it quickly fell
in the following decades due
to improvements in technology,
training and nutrition, says
Mears. Roger Bannister broke the
4-minute mile in part because of
interval training, for example.
There have been other
developments too, such as a
growing grasp of the role our

minds play in capping athletic
performance.
Mears describes Kipchoge as
a “once-in-a-lifetime athlete”. He
probably has superb VO 2 max – the
maximum amount of oxygen the
body can utilise – and exceptional
running economy, meaning he
uses energy extremely efficiently.
Kipchoge’s second effort at
sub-2-hours involved small
improvements to many different
aspects of the race, says Mears. The
formation of pacers around him
was precisely tweaked and the car
was slightly further ahead than
before. The drinking strategy was
different, the weather better, the
course flatter, his shoes slightly
modified – and this time there
was a supporting crowd. ❚

Eliud Kipchoge’s historic sub-2-hour marathon comes years ahead
of sport scientists’ predictions, reports Adam Vaughan

Pregnancy

Pollution linked to
miscarriage risk
HIGH levels of air pollution
may increase the chance
of a missed miscarriage,
according to data from
pregnant women living and
working in Beijing, China.
A missed or silent
miscarriage is when a fetus
dies or stops developing
during pregnancy, usually
without any symptoms. Such
miscarriages tend to happen
in the first trimester, and can
be picked up on 12-week
scans. Little is known about
what causes them.
Liqiang Zhang at Beijing
Normal University and his
colleagues assessed the
health records of 17,
women in Beijing who had
a missed miscarriage in
their first trimester. They
also collected data on the
levels of air pollutants close
to where the women lived
and worked.
Those exposed to higher
levels of air pollution had
an increased risk of a missed
miscarriage. The team didn’t
directly test if the link was
causal, but there is growing
evidence that air pollutants

can reach and potentially
harm a developing fetus
(Nature Sustainability,
doi. org/dcnh).
Zhang’s team also
found that, since China’s
government issued rules
to reduce pollution in 2013,
air pollutant levels have
declined, as has the risk
of missed miscarriage. ❚

Marathon milestone


News


XINHUA/ALAMY


Plastic pollution
Crabs in the Thames
river have stomachs
full of plastic p

Lyme disease
Are prolonged cases
really chronic fatigue
syndrome? p

Eternal wormhole
Quantum weirdness
means stargates
could persist p

Deep-sea bacteria
Angler fish may
shed luminous
microbes p

Green economy
The US has 10 times
more green jobs than
fossil fuel jobs p

“ There is growing
evidence that air
pollutants can reach
a developing fetus”
Free download pdf