The Globe and Mail - 24.10.2019

(C. Jardin) #1

A12 O THEGLOBEANDMAIL| THURSDAY,OCTOBER24,


EDITORIAL


PHILLIPCRAWLEY
PUBLISHERANDCEO
DAVIDWALMSLEY
EDITOR-IN-CHIEF

T


he federal election result on Monday has many sto-
ries to tell, but there are two that will shape the Tru-
deau minoritygovernment’s early days in power.
The first is that the majority of Canadians showed a demo-

cratic preference for parties that are committed to fighting


climate change and that support the federal carbon-pricing


regime.


Only the Conservatives campaigned against the carbon

tax, and they got 34.4 per cent of the popular vote. Prime Min-


ister Justin Trudeau and the Liberal Party will rightly contin-


ue making the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions a pri-


ority, and he said as much in his first postelection news con-


ference on Wednesday.


The second narrative is that of Western alienation. On

Monday, the Liberals lost their handful of seats in Saskatche-


wan and Alberta, which meansthe governing party has no


representatives from the two provinces with the most at


stake in the fight against climate change.


The West’s feeling of being shut out is made worse by the

fact the Liberals will have to rely on the NDP and Green Party


for support in Parliament – two parties that want to see the


oil sands closed down in short order – and on the Bloc Québé-


cois, which is opposed to new pipeline construction.


A lot of the resurgent “Wexit” talk is over the top. It was

particularly off-putting to see Saskatchewan Premier Scott


Moe release a letter the day after the election in which he


demanded that the Liberals cancel the federal carbon tax – as


if the winning party would ever adopt the main plank of its


defeated opponent.


And it has to be asked, what more could the Liberals do to

assuage Alberta and Saskatchewan beyond purchasing the


Trans Mountain pipeline, whichthe Trudeaugovernment


did, and approving its expansion, which it has also done


(twice)? The Liberals expended immense political capital in


the rest of the country fighting for a pipeline that Alberta


Premier Jason Kenney on Tuesday called his province’s “most


important economic imperative,” and yet somehow it cost


them seats in Saskatchewan and Alberta.


Still, it would be a mistake to dismiss the frustration of the

West – not because “Wexit” is a threat to be taken seriously,


but because the frustration is real and understandable.


Think about it. The federal carbon-pricing regime – which

we support – targets the West’s chief resource. The tax’s goal


is to encourage consumers to use less of it.


Yes, it’s fair to point out that the big oil producers support

the carbon tax. Yes, it’s one of the most efficient ways of re-


ducing emissions – something the planet must do.


But that does not change the hard fact that the carbon tax

singles out one Canadian resource, mostly produced in one


region of the country. That has to smart.


There is also the fact that the landlocked West is utterly

dependent on the federal government to be able to ship its


product to foreign markets via the most efficient and safe


means available: pipelines. As Mr. Kenney said, expanding


Trans Mountain is all that really matters at this point.


On Wednesday, Mr. Trudeaurecommittedhis government

to completing Trans Mountain, whether the other parties in


Parliament like it or not.


That’s a necessary commitment. It’s also a bold promise.

It’s going to be very tough for Mr. Trudeau to balance his twin


goals of fighting climate change and completing a state-own-


ed pipeline that has been vilified by the very parties he will


have to rely on for support in Parliament.


And it won’t pay off for him politically, either. Even if he

built Trans Mountain with his bare hands, it might not win


him any seats between the Rockies and Manitoba, while cost-


ing him seats in Ontario, Quebec and British Columbia.


He has to try, of course. It’s the job of thefederalgovern-

ment to consider the competing demands of all the regions


of Canada, and find a way forward that furthers the national


interest.


Still, it wouldn’t hurt Mr. Kenney and others to acknowl-

edge that the Liberals are the only party trying to balance the


needs of Canada’s oil industry with the need to curb carbon


emissions.


The Conservatives dropped the ball on climate change and

have been sidelined as a result; the other parties are actively


hostile to the oil patch. Funny, then, that the party Alberta


and Saskatchewan voters rejected may turn out to be their


best friend in Ottawa.


TheLiberals’


challenge


intheWest


WESTERLYWINDS

Re Kenney Warns PM: ‘Many Al-
bertans Feel Betrayed’ (Oct. 23):
As a former Albertan, I tend to
agree that the province has been
betrayed. I feel they were betrayed
by a series of Klein, Stelmach,
Redford and Prentice govern-
ments that mismanaged Alber-
ta’s oil and gas bounty, and left the
province in a fiscal mess. Along-
side past premiers, the Harper
government, which included cur-
rent Premier Jason Kenney, was
unable to get any pipelines
through the approval process.
Not even close.
KenLutesVancouver

I feel privileged to live in the rid-
ing of Edmonton Strathcona, the
only one in Alberta and Saskatch-
ewan that did not return a Tory to
Ottawa, but rather an NDP MP. Ed-
monton Strathcona is also home
to the University of Alberta,
where I happen to work, and Ja-
son Kenney is about to roll out his
budget. I worry he has the ivory
towers of postsecondary educa-
tion firmly in his sights.
Way to wipe a postelection
smile off a man’s face.
NigelBrachiEdmonton

A thought: Let’s eliminate Alber-
ta’s contributions to equalization
payments. No one can blame Al-
bertans for balking at money
transfers to provinces that de-
spise its source.
Canada should then take steps
to invest those funds in large-
scale green technology projects
based in Alberta. One day the in-
ternal combustion engine may be
a quaint relic in museums. Build-
ing pipelines may end up short-
sighted and pointless. The Cana-
dian government should give Al-
bertans something to hope and
strive for.
JimReynolds
Niagara-on-the-Lake,Ont.

Oil and gas is the lifeline of the
Prairies. But with the Bloc Québé-
cois wielding influence to the east
in Quebec, and the NDP in British
Columbia to the west, it seems the
federal government cannot get an
economic necessity through po-
litical barriers. Here is one way to
map success that meets every-
one’s needs: To the north, the Lib-
erals still rule.
Therefore I propose building
pipelines to run north through
the Northwest Territories and Yu-
kon to the port of Yakutat, Alaska,
on the Pacific Ocean. Voilà!
PeterFedirchukKanata,Ont.

I have never seen hard times any-
where in Canada like I see now in
Alberta. Intelligent, hard-working
people are struggling to survive.
All we need to stop this is to get
our oil products to the world mar-
ket. (We are even willing to share
our profit with other provinces.)
In these next four years, I ask
Justin Trudeau to let us at least
have a pipeline to the West Coast.

It should be the right of Albertans
to have access to the coastline like
any other Canadian.
EricLuzCalgary

POWEROUT

Re Blanchet Emerges As Only
Winner In A Field Of Losers (Oct.
23): All the noise about the power
of the Bloc Québécois seems like
hot air to me.
The Liberals, whose agenda has
been progressively left of centre,
need only the NDP to pass any leg-
islation, and Justin Trudeau and
Jagmeet Singh are relatively civil
with each other. Those two par-
ties seem to be at the centre of
power in this minoritygovern-
ment, not the Bloc. There would
not even be any hope on the other
side of the floor, as a Bloc-Conser-
vative coalition would fall far
short of a majority.
Former Bloc leader Gilles Du-
ceppe discovered this over a dec-
ade. Unfortunately, the same fate
awaits current chief Yves-François
Blanchet.
SamLarabyKirkland,Que.

SYSTEMERROR?

Re Why Doesn’t Every Vote
Count? (Oct. 23): Columnist Eliza-
beth Renzetti expresses gratitude
that Maxime Bernier’s People’s
Party of Canada was shut out of
Parliament, while at the same
time also lamenting for the very
system that would have guaran-
teed him seats. The binary nature
of first-past-the-post is imperfect.
It doesn’t record the depth of vic-
tory in a riding, only the simple
yes-no: Who won, who lost. But it
does usually exclude fringe par-
ties from gaining a seat.
Realizing that no system is per-
fect, I prefer a system that manag-
es to exclude extreme voices in fa-
vour of a commonality of voices
that better represents the will of
the people.
IanHopkinsOakville,Ont.

Two provinces have held referen-
dums on electoral reform.
In April, 2019, 51.7 per cent of
PEI voters voted No in a referen-
dum to change the provincial vot-
ing system from first-past-the-
post to mixed-member propor-
tional representation. In the fall
of 2018, 61.3 per cent of B.C. voters,
voting in their third provincial ref-
erendum on the voting system
since 2005, chose the current first-
past-the-post system.
I am a proponent of mixed-
member proportional represen-
tation and I have voted for electo-
ral reform in British Columbia.
While I would welcome the Prime
Minister championing federal
electoral reform, I think it would
be misguided for anyone to sug-
gest that this would necessarily
result in a consensus on this issue
among Canadians.
DavidLeishman
BrentwoodBay,B.C.

With almost all of those elected in
Alberta and Saskatchewan being
Conservatives, we now read that
these provinces feel their voices
will not be heard by a Liberal gov-
ernment. But almost one-third of
the voters in those provinces ac-
tually voted for the Liberals or
NDP. Will the voices of those vot-
ers be heard?
I believe our winner-take-all
electoral system promotes this
kind of alienation. I hope our gov-
ernment will finally get electoral
reform on the agenda.
ArtHeidebrechtDundas,Ont.

Surely Alberta and Saskatchewan
should be among the country’s
staunchest supporters of propor-
tional representation. After all,
some 14 per cent of voters in Al-
berta’s 34 ridings voted Liberal.
Under proportional representa-
tion, that percentage could have
returned some five Liberal MPs to
Parliament, not to mention the
NDP representatives as well.
I ask Jason Kenney, then, to go
for it: proportional representa-
tion to end Western alienation. Or
am I missing something?
BertJenkinsPicton,Ont.

How about this crazy idea: Why
don’t the Liberals form a majority
coalition with the Conservatives?
Think what even an attempt
would do for national unity.
NeilDonnellyKingston

BLUEINONTARIO

Re Scheer Accuses PM Of ‘Demon-
izing’ Ontario Premier (Oct. 23):
After Doug Ford’s 40-day silenc-
ing, it seems Andrew Scheer is at-
tempting to shift blame to Justin
Trudeau for his inability to break
through in the Greater Toronto
Area. What’s next? Will Mr. Scheer
blame the U.S.government for his
dual citizenship? Is LinkedIn at
fault for his misleading job histo-
ry? Perhaps YouTube should take
responsibility for any old videos
detailing his views on same-sex
marriage? I think I’m in danger of
whiplash.
IanKammToronto

CANADATHEGOOD

As a Canadian, I had the opportu-
nity to exercise my right to vote in
the federal election. It is a right I
am stripped of in my home coun-
try of Pakistan because I belong to
the Ahmadiyya Muslim Commu-
nity, a heavily persecuted sect of
Islam. How incredibly liberating it
feels to be part of a nation that
champions diversity and inclusiv-
ity.
WardahFaryalToronto

LETTERSTOTHEEDITOR


Thesubjectwhoistrulyloyaltothechiefmagistratewillneitheradvisenorsubmittoarbitrarymeasures-Junius


LetterstotheEditorshouldbe
exclusivetoTheGlobeandMail.
Includename,addressanddaytime
phonenumber.Keeplettersunder
150words.Lettersmaybeeditedfor
lengthandclarity.E-mail:
[email protected]

SINCLAIRSTEWART
DEPUTYEDITOR


CHRISTINEBROUSSEAU
ASSISTANTMANAGINGEDITOR,NEWS


DEREKDECLOET
EXECUTIVEEDITOR
EDITOR,REPORTONBUSINESS
SHAWNARICHER
ASSISTANTMANAGINGEDITOR,
FEATURESANDSPORTS

ANGELAPACIENZA
MANAGINGEDITOR,EXPERIENCE
GARYSALEWICZ
ASSISTANTMANAGINGEDITOR,EXPERIENCE

DENNISCHOQUETTE
HEADOFENTERPRISE
TONYKELLER
EDITORIALPAGEEDITOR

SYLVIASTEAD
PUBLICEDITOR
NATASHAHASSAN
OPINIONEDITOR
Free download pdf