2019-10-12_The_Economist_

(C. Jardin) #1
The EconomistOctober 12th 2019 Science & technology 83

2


1

cosmological—almost invisible to the out-
side world. Yet together William Kaelin, Sir
Peter Ratcliffe and Gregg Semenza have an-
swered an important question: how cells
detect and adjust to the level of oxygen
available to fuel their activities.
The crucial molecule in the system that
matches cell physiology to oxygen avail-
ability is a protein complex called hypoxia-
inducible factor (hif). hifwas discovered
and named by Dr Semenza, who works at
Johns Hopkins University, in Baltimore. In
the 1990s Dr Semenza was studying eryth-
ropoiesis, the process that generates red
blood corpuscles. These are the cells that
carry oxygen in the bloodstream, and their
number depends on how much oxygen
there is around. Professional athletes, for
example, often train at high altitude, where
the thin air means oxygen is scarce, in or-
der to grow extra red blood cells that will
assist their respiration when they compete
nearer to sea level.
The hormone that triggers erythropoie-
sis is called erythropoietin, or epo. Indeed
epo, which is manufactured as a drug to
help those with anaemia, is also used ille-
gally by some athletes to boost their red-
cell count without the trouble of visiting
high altitudes. (In cycling, for example, it is
notorious.) Dr Semenza was looking at a
stretch of dna, located within the gene that
encodes epo, which switches that gene on
and off. In doing so he discovered hif, a
protein complex that, by attaching to or de-
taching from the dnaswitch (see diagram
3), does the switch-throwing. Since Dr Se-
menza’s discovery, 300 genes similarly reg-
ulated by hifhave been found.
Dr Kaelin’s contribution was to discover
a further protein, vhl, that regulates how
levels of hifin a cell are controlled by oxy-
gen levels. hifactually consists of two pro-
teins, now known as hif-1 alpha and arnt.
arntis always present in a cell, but the lev-
el of hif-1 alpha depends on the amount of
oxygen present. More oxygen means less
hif-1 alpha. That, in turn, means less of the
hif complex. Genes like that for epo,
which rely on hifto switch them on, thus

remaininactive.
DrKaelin,whoworksattheDana-Far-
berCancerInstituteinBoston,wasstudy-
inganinheritedgeneticillnesscalledvon
Hippel-Lindau’sdiseasewhichgreatlyin-
creasesthelikelihoodofcertaintumours
(sometimes benign, sometimes malig-
nant,affectingorgansincludingthekid-
neysandeyes)developing.vhlisthepro-
tein encoded by the gene that, when
mutatedandthusnon-functional,causes
von Hippel-Lindau’s disease. Dr Kaelin
showedthata non-functionalvhl-encod-
inggenecausedmanyhif-regulatedgenes
togointooverdrive—whichistheunderly-
ingcauseofthetumoursinquestion.
Thepiecesofthepuzzlewerethenput
togetherbySirPeter,whoworksatOxford
University.Heshowedthatvhlandhif-1
alphainteractwithoneanother,andthat
thisinteraction,whichincorporatesmole-
culescalledhydroxylgroupsintothemix,
makeshif-1 alphasusceptibletodegrada-
tioninthepresenceofoxygen.Thedegra-
dationisnotdirect.Itisnotthathif-1 al-
phaisbeingoxidised,andthusdestroyed.
Rather, the hydroxyl groups, which are
createdbya reactionbetweenhif-1 alpha
andoxygen,markitfordestructionbya
cell’sprotein-degradingmachinery.
Thepracticalupshotofallthisisa better
understandingofthebiologyunderlying
anaemia,tumourssuchasthoseencour-
agedbyvonHippel-Lindau’sdiseaseand
many other oxygen-sensitive processes.
Theseincludethehealingofwounds,the
growthofbloodvessels(onereasonforthe
linkwithtumours,sincetheseneedextra
bloodvesselsinordertogrow),and the
likelihood of heart attacks and strokes.
Withluck,drugstailoredtoregulatetheac-
tionsofthevarioushif-controlledgenes
involvedwillbeabletopromoteorprevent
thesephenomena—and,albeitmorequiet-
lythanisthecaseforlithium-ionbatteries,
theintentionofNobel’swillwillhavebeen
fulfilledinthiscase,too. 7

An aerobic workout

Sources: Nobel Foundation; Guido Hegasy

Howcellsadapttooxygenavailability

3

Normal oxygen levels Lowoxygenlevels

VHL

O2

OH
OH
O2

O2
OH
OH
→→→

VHL
Nuc
leus

ARNT HIF


1

1

2

2

3

3

A


t the turnof the millennium it was
clear a new approach was required in
the war against three of the biggest threats
to human life and development. There was
need for a trustworthy international orga-
nisation that could solicit donations from
rich countries and wealthy organisations,
and spend that money on combating those
threats in collaboration with the govern-
ments of afflicted poor countries, but with
appropriate oversight to ensure effective-
ness and avoid theft. The result was the
Global Fund to Fight aids, Tuberculosis
and Malaria.
And it worked. Though it is impossible
to say what would have happened without
the Global Fund, as it is now formally
known, the fund’s officials claim to have
saved 32m lives since it opened in 2002. As
with liberty, though, the price of success is
eternal vigilence—and many in the field
fear further progress is under threat. To re-
main on course to hit its self-proclaimed
target to save 16m lives by 2023, the fund
says it will need pledges of at least $14bn by
the end of this year. This week, at a so-
called replenishment meeting in Lyon,
France, it has been setting out its stall.
Fourteen billion dollars is a 15% in-
crease on the fund’s current three-year
budget. It will, though, be more than
matched by $46bn raised to combat the
diseases in question by recipient countries
themselves. And that spending will be a
good deal. The returns on the best health
investments are between 900 and 2,000%.
Conversely, as with all infectious diseases,
if efforts slacken, those illnesses will be
back with a vengeance.
Of the three targets, tuberculosis (tb) is
the worst. Every year, it is estimated, more
than 10m people catch the bacterium
which causes this illness, and 1.6m die of it.
Tuberculosis, though, is an odd infection.
Often, the bacteria remain dormant and an
individual hosting them presents no
symptoms. As a consequence (and also be-
cause some people delay seeking treat-
ment) nearly 40% of cases are missed. At
the same time, there has been a worrying
rise in drug-resistant forms of tb. These are
a challenge everywhere—including rich
countries—and cause a third of all deaths
from the disease. The un’s goal is, with 2015
as the baseline, to reduce the number of
deaths by 95% and the incidence of the ill-
ness by 90% by 2035. That goal, most agree,
will be missed without shifts of strategy.

How to defeat AIDS, malaria and
tuberculosis

The global burden of disease

Building tomorrow


Listen to our discussion about the Nobel
prizes at economist.com /nobelprizes2019
Free download pdf