Barron\'s - 30.09.2019

(singke) #1

28 BARRON’S September 30, 2019


Funds


The SEC’s New ETF Rule Evens the Field


BySarahMax


THE $4 TRILLION EXCHANGE-TRADED FUND INDUSTRY HAS FOR


thepast27yearsoperatedviaaquirkinthelaw.Aftersome


dramaticback-and-forththisweek,theSecuritiesandEx-


change Commission has finally changed that.


Themorethan2,200ETFsonthemarkettodayhavees-


sentiallybeencreatedviaaloopholeinthelawthatgoverns


mutualfundsandotherinvestmentproductsforindividual


investors.Themuch-hypedandlong-awaitedETFRulewas


supposedtochangethat,makingiteasierforcompaniesto


create new products. After canceling an open meeting


scheduled for Wednesday to vote on this proposed regula-


tion, the SEC announced on Thursday that it has in fact


adopted the ETF Rule, officially known as Rule 6c-11.


“It is arguably the most important piece of regulatory


actiontohittheETFindustrysince1993,”saysDaveNa-


dig,whoismanagingdirectorofETF.com.“It’sararewin


for both investors and the industry.”


Broadlyspeaking,ETFshavebeenbeholdentothesame


rulesasmutualfunds,viatheInvestmentCompanyActof


1940—butwithamajorasterisk.BecauseETFsarediffer-


ent than mutual funds in myriad ways, issuers have been


requiredtoapplyfor“exemptiverelief”withtheSEC.“It’s


basicallyafancywayofsaying‘gettingpermissiontobreak


the rules,’ ” says Nadig.


Since 1992, the SEC had issued more


than300exemptiveordersallowingETFs


to operate. That additional step drove up


thetimeandcostoflaunchingnewETFs—evenwhenthey


weresimilartofundslaunchedbyotherfirms.“EachETF


was essentially being treated as if it’s a snowflake, where


nothing is the same, and it slows down the process,” says


Todd Rosenbluth, director of fund research at CFRA.


This dynamic also created an environment where some


ETFprovidersweresubjecttomore-stringentregulations


thanothers,basedonthedealseachfirmstruck.“Allhave


slightlydifferentthingsthey’reallowedtodobecausethey


appliedforexemptivereliefatdifferenttimeswithdifferent


commissioners,” says Nadig. The early entrants generally


gotverybroadexemptivereleases,whileprovidersthathave


filed more recently have been held to stricter standards.


The ETF Rule scraps all of that and holds most ETFs


to the same regulatory framework. (There are exceptions


forleveragedandinversefunds.)Oneyearaftertherule’s


effectivedate,theSECwillrescindanyexemptivereliefit


had previously granted. At that point, most ETFs will be


following the same playbook.


This change offers an immediate benefit for existing


ETFsthatweresubjecttomorestringentrulesthantheir


peers.Italsoremovesbarrierstoentryfornewcomersthat


might have been deterred by the additional cost and com-


plexity of filing for exemptive relief.


“Oneofthebiggestpositivesthatwillcomeoutoftherule


will be the availability of custom creation and redemption


basketsforallissuers,”saysJordanFarris,headofETFsat


Nuveen,whichlauncheditsfirstETFsin2016andnowhas


a dozen ETFs, primarily focused on enhanced income and


environmental,social,andgovernance,orESG,factors.“It


will essentially level the playing field between those who


receivedtheirexemptivereliefwithinthepastseveralyears,


versus those who received it 10 or more years ago.”


Investors should ultimately benefit, says Rosenbluth.


While ETF fees are already low, the new ETF Rule could


helpnudgethemlowerstill—byreducingtheupfrontcosts


of launching a fund, opening doors for more competition,


andallowingfundstousecustombasketstominimizetrad-


ingcosts.Italsopotentiallyimprovesmoretransparencyby


requiring issuers to disclose on their websites historical


informationrelatedtobid-askspreads,andpremiumsand


discounts to net asset value.


The biggest sticking point with the previous regula-


tion—or lack thereof—related to whether an ETF can use


custom baskets. ETFs are able to minimize trading costs


andimprovetaxefficiencybycreatingandredeemingshares


throughauthorizedparticipants.Typically,theydothiswith


a basket of securities that mimics the rest of the portfolio,


butthatisn’talwaysfeasible,saysEdBaer,anattorneyin


Ropes&Gray’sassetmanagementgroupinSanFrancisco.


That’swherecustombasketsarekey.Inthecaseofanac-


tivelymanagedfund,forexample,amanagermaywanttosell


aspecificstockandbuyanewone.Afixed-incomemanager


mayfindthatthebondsitneedstobuyaren’tevenavailable.


“It’sverydifficulttooperateafixed-incomefundwithoutthe


ability to engage in custom transactions,” Baer says.


In 2012, the SEC stopped issuing exemptive relief that


permittedcustombaskets.FirmsthathadissuedETFsbe-


fore that have been able to apply their exemptive relief to


newfunds,butmorerecententrantsdidn’thavethatoption.


Now, ETFs can use custom baskets. “This change is a


huge boon for younger firms,” says Nadig, who says this


could open doors for more actively managed ETFs.


With thousands of ETFs already on the market, why


should investors be excited about regulation that opens


doorsforstillmore?“Wedohavetoomanyproducts,”says


Rosenbluth,“but[now]themarket’sgoingtodecidewhat’s


going to be successful, not regulators.”


“It’s arguably the most


important piece of


regulatory action to


hit the ETF industry


since 1993.”


CashTrack,


pageM27

Free download pdf