EDITOR’S ESSAY 018
Our planet is on
the threshold – but
businesses can pull
us f rom the brink
ILLUSTRATION: GREGORI SAAVEDRA
BSME Editor of the Year, Technology 2018 • BSME Art Team of the Year 2018 • BSME Editor of the Year, Technology 2017 • PPA Designer of the Year, Consumer
2017 • BSME Art Team of the Year 2017 • BSME Print Writer of the Year 2017 • DMA Magazine of the Year 2015 • DMA Cover of the Year 2015 • DMA Technology
Magazine of the Year 2015 • DMA Magazine of the Year 2014 • BSME Art Director of the Year, Consumer 2013 • PPA Media Brand of the Year, Consumer 2013 • DMA
Technology Magazine of the Year 2012 • DMA Editor of the Year 2012 • BSME Editor of the Year, Special Interest 2012 • D& AD Award: Covers 2012 • DMA Editor
of the Year 2011 • DMA Magazine of the Year 2011 • DMA Technology Magazine of the Year 2011 • BSME Art Director of the Year, Consumer 2011 • D& AD Award:
Entire Magazine 2011 • D& AD Award: Covers 2010 • Maggies Technology Cover 2010 • PPA Designer of the Year, Consumer 2010 • BSME Launch of the Year 2009
Greg Williams
Editor
You might not have heard of the
Stockholm Resilience Centre (SRC), but
the non-profit research group based in
the Swedish Capital is responsible for
one of the most important concepts
of the modern age. In 2009, the SRC
convened a number of environmental
scientists and other academics to
identify the planetary life support
systems that are essential for human life
- and the impact of humans upon them.
They identified nine Earth system
processes so fundamental that, should
a threshold be crossed, it could affect
the planet’s ability to sustain life. These
are: ocean acidification; stratospheric
ozone depletion; biodiversity loss and
extinction; chemical pollution; climate
change; the global hydrological cycle
(the functioning and distribution of fresh
water); land system change (such as the
loss of forests to agriculture); nitrogen and
phosphorous flows to the biosphere and
oceans; and atmospheric aerosol loading.
Six years after the planetary boundary
framework was created, the journal
found itself consumed for over three
years with a single issue. Taken on one
level, three years doesn’t seem like a
great deal of time. Yet, that three years of
UK governmental gridlock, combined with
a corresponding lack of urgency from
other global leaders, is an indictment
of the political class when it comes to
the most pressing issue of our time.
The impact of Brazil’s Jair Bolsonaro
and a US President committed to rolling
back environmental regulations and
protections enacted by his predecessor,
does little to lift a darkening mood that
humankind is destined to one day
represent little more than a layer in a
rock formation for a geologist to discover.
However, the absence of political
leadership has left a vacuum into which
a series of academics, entrepreneurs,
business leaders – and, yes, some politi-
cians – have stepped to take on signif-
icant challenges. In this issue of WIRED
we profile two of them. The economist
Mariana Mazzucato has developed a
framework for government and the
private sector to pursue “moonshots” to
solve some of the planet’s most signif-
icant challenges, and has challenged the
idea of how we think about innovation.
Elsewhere, we look at the work of
Jochen Zeitz, the former CEO of Puma
and executive at the luxury goods
powerhouse Kering, who has proved
that a sustainable, ethical, long term
approach to business is compatible with
profitability. He has also walked the walk
when it comes to his beliefs – he has
rewilded 20,000 acres in Kenya working
in partnership with the local community.
The tech-for-good and B Corp sector
is booming, and even asset managers
- under pressure from investors – are
questioning the practices of extractive
businesses that describe pollution
and environmental destruction as an
“externality” to their business model.
And a new era of startups focused
on energy, foodtech, carbon capture,
recycling, mobility, social inclusion and
manufacturing could help the billions
of people who still do not have the
essentials of life as defined by the UN
Sustainable Development Goals.
History suggests that the switch to
new energy sources initiates eras of
prosperity – the move from burning
wood to coal, and from coal to oil and
electricity, all marked eras in which
innovation increased prosperity. As
economies switch from carbon-based
to renewable sources of energy, and
a growing movement of people come
together to act on sustainable devel-
opment that benefits humankind and the
planet, there is still much to be hopeful
about – while keeping an eye on the clock.
Science published a paper by 18 eminent
scientists, showing that four bound-
aries had been crossed: climate change;
loss of biosphere integrity; land system
change; and biogeochemical flows of
nitrogen and phosphorous.
One of the many tragedies of the Brexit
fiasco is that the UK government has
11-19-FREdsletter.indd 18 17/09/2019 10:04