CalmMoment.com 43
B
eing in a loving, secure
relationship can be incredibly
rewarding. Especially one
where trust is at the heart,
loyalty prevails and care for one
another is a priority.
But what happens when, despite the love,
something doesn’t feel quite right? Perhaps
arguments occur when the other person
doesn’t step up in the way we wish they
would, or we feel misunderstood, neglected
or attacked when it comes to resolving
everyday issues. It is common for even those
in long-term relationships to feel they and
their partner want different things from the
union. For some, that balance might be
impossible to overcome and could, in time,
lead to a relationship breakdown. Others
may compromise by putting their own needs
on the backburner.
According to relationship psychotherapist
Pam Custers, there is a way to tackle these
Knowing our individual emotional
needs could be the key to ultimate
relationship contentment
Words: Karen Edwards
attachment
CalmMoment.com 43
differences without losing who we are or the
relationship in the process – and the key is in
establishing why we have the needs we do.
We can learn the reason behind those needs
by identifying our individual, and our
partner’s, ‘attachment style’ – a term that is
used by psychologists to describe how
human beings respond in relationships when
hurt, are separated from loved ones or
perceive a threat.
“Our attachment style is predominantly
laid down during our early development,”
explains Pam. “From our first breath, we look
to our parents for availability and response.
Our early emotional equilibrium affects how
we function within a relationship as an adult.
Essentially, our attachment style becomes a
template for how we manage emotional
triggers when we get older.”
Research into the ‘attachment theory’ was
pioneered by British psychologist John
Bowlby in the 1950s. In the 1980s, Denver
University psychologists Cindy Hazan and
Phillip Shaver presented readers of Colorado
newspaper, Rocky Mountain News, with three
descriptions – asking them to decide which
statement they identified with the most. Each
statement described a pattern of feelings