The New York Times - 19.09.2019

(Tuis.) #1
THE NEW YORK TIMES NATIONALTHURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 19, 2019 N A

WASHINGTON — Mitch Mc-
Connell, the Senate Republican
leader and self-described “grim
reaper” of liberal legislative
dreams, settled into a routine of
sorts during Barack Obama’s sec-
ond term whenever he felt he was
cornered by Democrats.
Mr. McConnell would rise from
his chair in the Capitol, walk to his
scheduler’s desk, smile a tight
smile, and ask: “Can we get Joe
Biden on the phone?”
That was precisely what hap-
pened in late 2012, when Republi-
cans were still in the minority in
the Senate, and Mr. McConnell hit
an impasse with Harry Reid, the
Democratic leader, over the elimi-
nation of Bush-era tax cuts for the
wealthy.
As a New Year’s Eve deadline
approached, Mr. Biden and Mr.
McConnell hammered out an
agreement in a dozen phone calls,
aides to both men said, with Mr.
Obama signing off on every move.
The two sides struck a deal that
delivered some, but far from all, of
what Mr. Reid wanted. This year,
as he runs for president, Mr. Biden
cites that deal and others he cut
with Mr. McConnell as proof of his
skill in achieving bipartisan legis-
lation in an otherwise hyperparti-
san environment.
“I’ll work with Mitch McConnell
where we can agree,” Mr. Biden
said this month — adding that on
some issues, like gun control,
there was no room for compro-
mise.
That he could agree with Mr.
McConnell on anything is a con-
troversial statement for any Dem-
ocrat to make these days. But in a
sprawling field of 20 candidates,
Mr. Biden stands out for his endur-
ing belief in the good will of con-
gressional Republicans. He insists
that the G.O.P. has been bullied by
President Trump but that civility
and compromise will return to
Washington once Mr. Trump is
gone.
It’s a view that has been
branded as naïve and wistful by
some Democratic rivals as well as
by the ascendant left wing of his
party. That criticism is particu-
larly pointed with regard to Mr.
McConnell, whose decision to
block Mr. Obama’s nomination of
Merrick B. Garland to the Su-
preme Court in 2016 elevated him
from mere obstructionist to arch-
villain in the eyes of many Demo-
crats.
The criticism has only intensi-
fied in recent days as Mr. McCon-
nell has rebuffed Democratic calls
to quickly move ahead with gun
control legislation and lashed out
at Democrats for reviving attacks
on Supreme Court Justice Brett
Kavanaugh.
As a result, many in the party
say, Mr. Biden’s comfortable rela-
tionship with the Senate leader is
not only out of date, but danger-
ous.
“Mitch McConnell over the last
decade has basically been on a
crusade to destroy the Senate, so
this idea that just getting rid of
Trump would somehow send us
back to some Golden Age in the
Senate is ridiculous,” said Senator
Michael Bennet of Colorado, a ri-
val presidential candidate.
Mr. Bennet was one of three
Democratic senators to vote
against the 2012 budget deal,
viewing it as an unnecessary ca-
pitulation that has emboldened
Mr. McConnell.
“You have to have some pretty
seriously rose-colored glasses to
think that the last six years of the
Obama administration showed
great promise in terms of deliber-
ation or legislation,” Mr. Bennet
said.
Mr. Biden and Mr. McConnell


were not especially close in their
nearly 25 years together in the
Senate. But interviews with two
dozen people close to both men
show that their relationship, while
not quite an actual friendship, be-
came stronger — and more mutu-
ally beneficial — during Mr. Oba-
ma’s second term. Their negotia-
tions offered Mr. Biden a more
powerful role, and gave Mr. Mc-
Connell a congenial bargaining
partner and what the Senate
leader viewed as the path of least
resistance to striking a deal, in the
view of Biden critics.
Mr. Biden and his defenders say
he is being attacked for refusing to
accept what they consider a false
premise: that progress is possible
only through the use of uncompro-
mising political force.
“How in the hell are you going
to get a damned thing done if you
don’t talk to the other side?” said
former Senator Alan Simpson, Re-
publican of Wyoming, who struck
up an across-the-aisle friendship
with Mr. Biden in the 1970s.
“I see people saying he can’t be
president because he talked to
this one or that one,” Mr. Simpson
added. “Here’s what I want to tell
them: You think you can be a
United States senator, and do your
job, really do your job, by not talk-
ing to the other side? You have to
talk to the commies, the kooks, the
racists, the Tea Party, you have to
talk to everybody.”
Mr. Biden, 76, has said he is
bound to Mr. McConnell and other

opponents by “civility” and an un-
breakable, unwritten code that
the Democratic leader Mike
Mansfield preached to him early
in his career: “It’s always appro-
priate to question another man’s
judgment, but never appropriate
to question his motives.”
As senators, Mr. Biden and Mr.
McConnell had little interaction.
They served briefly together on
the Judiciary Committee in the
late 1980s, and worked on only one
significant piece of legislation to-
gether, a 2007 measure seeking to
improve human rights in Myan-
mar.
By 2010, however, Mr. McCon-
nell had reached two conclusions
that pushed him toward Mr. Bi-
den, according to a dozen people
close to both men, who spoke
anonymously to disclose private
discussions.
First, he did not believe he could
work with Mr. Reid, a former
prizefighter who viewed Mr. Mc-
Connell as an obstructionist who
needed to be thwarted at all costs.
Mr. McConnell, for his part,
thought Mr. Reid was not a good-
faith negotiator, and suspected
Democrats were leaking details of
negotiations, two people close to
him said.
Then there was Mr. Obama. The
two men felt deeply uncomfort-
able in each other’s presence, ac-
cording to their aides and their
own public statements. In his
book, Mr. McConnell admitted he
privately called the president

“Professor Obama” because he
was so prone to lecturing him. Mr.
Obama and his aides thought Mr.
McConnell was disdainful and
taciturn, according to former
members of Mr. Obama’s staff.
“From the beginning, it was
clear that President Obama
wanted Biden to take the lead with
McConnell,” said Ted Kaufman, a
longtime aide and friend to Mr. Bi-
den. “Biden had a very realistic
view of McConnell and knew that
they had major differences.”
After being overshadowed dur-
ing Mr. Obama’s first term, Mr. Bi-
den embraced the opportunity to
become a power player.
In 2010, Mr. McConnell and Mr.
Biden negotiated a last-minute
deal that prevented a government
shutdown. A year later, Mr. Mc-

Connell hit the Biden speed dial
again, this time to avert a poten-
tially catastrophic failure to raise
the debt limit precipitated by Tea
Party Republicans in the House.
All of that was a dress rehearsal
for 2012 and another showdown
over the debt limit, the so-called
fiscal cliff. Mr. Obama was fresh
off a convincing re-election win
over Mitt Romney that was pro-
pelled, in part, by his promise to
scrap tax cuts for families earning
more than $250,000, enacted by
George W. Bush in 2001.
Mr. Reid staked out a maximal-
ist position, saying he was willing
to go over the cliff; Mr. Obama, de-
spite having campaigned on the
issue, was worried “that a sudden
major tax hike and massive
spending cut could together trig-
ger another recession,” Gene
Sperling, a top Obama economic
aide, said in an interview.

Two days before the deadline,
the talks stalled. That’s when Mr.
McConnell placed his call to Mr.
Biden, who was on Air Force Two.
“Get off now!” Mr. McConnell said
in a voice mail message, accord-
ing to former aides to both men.
From there, things went fairly
quickly. Mr. McConnell, aides said,
was spooked by the election re-
sults and eager to cut a deal; Mr.
Biden operated within a narrow
range of parameters established
by Mr. Obama and his economic
team, but he also brought his own
reassuring presence to the talks.
“When he’d say, ‘Mitch, it’s Joe.
You know me. I am telling you
there is no way we can go there’ —
that kind of thing was always
more convincing coming from
him,” Mr. Sperling recalled.
At one tense moment, Mr. Biden
— hunched over a speakerphone
in his office with Mr. Sperling and
other staff members — struggled
to remember the name of Rohit
Kumar, the McConnell adviser
crunching the numbers for Re-
publicans.
“Oh, hell, can I just call you
Mitch’s guy?” Mr. Biden said, ac-
cording to a person who was on
the call — to laughter.
The deal they struck was a par-
tial victory for Democrats, raising
top tax rates for families earning
more than $450,000 and extend-
ing some unemployment insur-
ance benefits. “I feel very, very
good,” Mr. Biden told reporters on
New Year’s Day.
Others did not. A handful of pro-
gressive Democrats — including
Sherrod Brown of Ohio, Jeff
Merkley of Oregon, Tom Harkin of
Iowa and Bernie Sanders of Ver-
mont — stormed into Mr. Reid’s of-
fice to complain, according to
Democratic aides. He told them to
vote with their consciences and
informed the White House he
would back the deal, but would not
sell it. The measure passed easily.
During a follow-up meeting in
the Oval Office in early 2013, Mr.
Obama pressed Mr. McConnell to
work on a long-term budget pack-

age before the 2014 midterms,
when he would be running for re-
election in Kentucky, Mr. Reid re-
called in a recent phone interview.
Mr. McConnell said that was im-
possible — Republican primary
challengers could use it against
incumbents.
Mr. Biden responded by saying,
“Mitch, we want to see you come
back,” Mr. Reid said.
In recent years, Mr. Biden has
not been shy about criticizing Mr.
McConnell’s actions, especially
the decision to block Judge Gar-
land. But he has been loath to de-
nounce him personally — to the
annoyance of some of his own
staff members, according to a cur-
rent Biden adviser.
Neither man has much incen-
tive these days to highlight their
bonhomie: Mr. McConnell will
also be running for office in 2020,
seeking a seventh term. His office
declined to comment for this story.
But both men spoke affection-
ately about each other when there
was less at stake politically.
In December 2016, Mr. McCon-
nell offered an emotional send-off
to Mr. Biden from the well of the
Senate, recounting a boyhood bat-
tle that echoed his own struggles
with polio as a toddler.
“The man we honor today was-
n’t always a talker,” he said. “He
suffered from a debilitating stut-
ter for most of his childhood. He
was teased for it. But he was de-
termined to overcome it. And so
he did.”
When Mr. Biden’s son Beau died
in 2015, Mr. McConnell was the
only Senate Republican to attend
his funeral, a gesture that deeply
moved Mr. Biden, according to a
person close to Mr. McConnell.
In 2011, Mr. Biden, commenting
on the large crowd that saw him
speak at the University of Lou-
isville’s McConnell Center, peered
at his host and said: “You want to
see whether or not a Republican
and Democrat really like one an-
other. Well, I’m here to tell you we
do.”

At a 2009 meeting, above, Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. was flanked by Senator Mitch Mc-
Connell of Kentucky and President Barack Obama. Mr. Biden, at left stumping in Galivants Ferry,
S.C., cited his deals with Mr. McConnell as proof that he could cut through the partisan divide.

RON EDMONDS/ASSOCIATED PRESS

TRAVIS DOVE FOR THE NEW YORK TIMES

A relationship that is


criticized as out of


date and dangerous.


By GLENN THRUSH

Biden Has Faith in McConnell. Some Democratic Rivals Wonder Why.


OTAY MESA, Calif. — One
thing President Trump loves
about his job is signing his name.
He relishes signing executive or-
ders, letters to foreign leaders and
even red Make America Great
Again hats. But on Wednesday, he
signed a wall.
At the invitation of the team
building his new barrier along the
border, he affixed his distinctive
signature to one of the steel slats
that have risen just opposite Mex-
ico in recent months, the most
physical manifestation of what he
plans to make his argument for a
second term next year and, he
hopes, his place in the history
books.
Mr. Trump flew to this dusty
community outside San Diego on
a hot, sunny day to highlight the
progress, however halting, that he
said was finally being made after
a couple of years of frustration
and political opposition. Like a
builder showing off a new tower in
New York, he talked in detail
about the new barrier, explaining
how the 30-foot slats are erected
with rebar inside and then filled
with concrete and boasting that it
would be the most impenetrable
wall in the world.
“The wall has a ways to go, but
we’re building it at breakneck


speed,” he said, surrounded by
Border Patrol agents and con-
struction workers. “When this is
completed,” he added, “there
won’t be a border anywhere like
this.”
What he sees as security, of
course, is viewed much differently
by others who see it as a waste of
money or even a symbol of intoler-
ance. Critics say the wall repre-
sents a departure from the values
of a country built on immigration
and is hardly the most cost-effec-
tive way to reduce the number of
people illegally living in the
United States.
Moreover, it is not even the wall
that the president promised as a
candidate in 2016. At the time, he
vowed to build 1,000 miles of barri-
er that he insisted would be paid
for by Mexico. Instead, he has re-
duced his goal to 500 miles and
has diverted money from military
construction projects and other
government programs over the
objection of Congress, which re-
fused to give him the money.
Of the 500 miles, the adminis-
tration has so far built only 66
miles of replacement barriers in
areas that previously had either
battered fencing or vehicle block-
ades. But Mr. Trump’s administra-
tion has yet to extend the new
steel frames, ranging from 18 to 30
feet, to any part of the border that
did not previously have some sort
of impediment.

Mr. Trump’s photo op at the bor-
der was his only public appear-
ance during two days in Califor-
nia, a state that has been a hotbed
of opposition to his presidency
and policies. While fund-raising
for his re-election, he made a point
of taking on California and its
Democratic leaders, portraying
its biggest cities as awash in
homelessness and crime while
moving to overturn the state’s ef-
forts to thwart his environmental
deregulation initiatives.
He met with none of California’s
top elected leaders while in the
state and appeared before no au-
dience except those paying thou-
sands of dollars to attend any of
four fund-raising events that col-
lectively were expected to draw at
least $15 million for his re-election
campaign and Republicans.
Mr. Trump returned to the same
section of the border that he vis-
ited in March 2018 to inspect
prototypes of his new wall. This
area has also been a flash point for
another hotly disputed policy en-
acted by the administration. The
policy forcing migrants seeking
asylum to remain in Mexico for
the duration of their case began at
the San Ysidro port of entry this
year, forcing hundreds of migrant
families to wait in shelters in Ti-
juana.
The policy has since been ex-
tended farther east to more dan-
gerous Mexican cities like Nuevo
Laredo, where migrants have

been subjected to kidnappings
and violence. More than 40,
migrants have been returned to
Mexico under the policy, which
the administration says is needed
to weed out fraudulent asylum
claims and ease the burden on a
detention system that experi-
enced extensive overcrowding
this year.
The president was joined by
Kevin K. McAleenan, the acting
secretary of homeland security,
and other top officials who are
also still serving in an acting ca-
pacity, underscoring the exten-
sive turnover at the department
as the president has repeatedly
fired officials who disappointed
him in cracking down on immigra-

tion, including its general counsel,
who was dismissed just this week.
“I wasn’t happy with the job they
were doing,” Mr. Trump said, but
added that he would announce
permanent appointments soon.
Mr. Trump said he still expected
to get nearly all of the 500 miles
completed by the time he stands
for re-election next year and said
more was not needed because of
natural barriers along stretches of
the border. While Mexico is not
paying for the wall, he noted that it
is paying for its soldiers to stop
migrants in a more aggressive
campaign begun in recent months
under pressure from Mr. Trump.
The characteristically money-
conscious president repeatedly

noted that this was the most ex-
pensive possible variant, saying
he had originally wanted a simple
and less costly concrete barrier
but was convinced by Border Pa-
trol professionals that it would be
better to have a slatted barrier
that they could see through to ob-
serve any potential threat on the
other side. “That’s the Rolls-
Royce version,” he said in a cha-
grined tone.
Mr. Trump said the steel slats
would be wired — the Army gen-
eral accompanying him declined
to elaborate — and added that
they would absorb heat so that
they would be too scalding for po-
tential migrants to even touch,
much less scale. “You can fry an
egg on that wall,” he said.
Mark Morgan, the president’s
acting commissioner of Customs
and Border Protection, called the
new barriers “a game changer”
that has reduced illegal crossings.
“There’s a false narrative out
there that this wall is the presi-
dent’s vanity wall,” Mr. Morgan
said as Mr. Trump listened. “I’m
here to tell you right now that’s
false.”
Mr. Trump was then told that it
was tradition for those working on
the wall to sign it and was asked to
follow suit. He happily took the
pen.

A Signature Trump Moment at the Border


By PETER BAKER

Zolan Kanno-Youngs contributed
reporting from Washington.


President Trump signing a portion of the new barrier going up
across from Mexico in Otay Mesa, Calif., on Wednesday.

ERIN SCHAFF/THE NEW YORK TIMES

Pointing to progress


on a wall in a bid to


bolster his campaign.

Free download pdf